Assessing research in the history of sociology and anthropology

Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 227-237

  Kuklick, Henrika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOLOGY; ARTICLE; BOOK; HISTORY; HUMAN; LITERATURE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SOCIOLOGY;

ANTHROPOLOGY; BIOGRAPHY; HISTORIOGRAPHY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SOCIOLOGY; TEXTBOOKS;

EID: 0033142428     PISSN: 00225061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199922)35:3<227::AID-JHBS2>3.0.CO;2-S     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Asad, T. (Ed.) (1973). Anthropology and the colonial encounter. London: Ithaca Press.
2. Broom, L., & Selznick, P. (1968). Sociology (4th ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
3. Brush, S. G. (1974). Should the history of science be rated X? Science, 183, 1164-1172.
4. Camic, C. (1992). Reputation and predecessor selection. American Sociological Review, 57, 421-445.
5. Carlson, R. G. (1993). Hierarchy and the Haya Divine Kingship: A structural and symbolic reformulation of Frazer's thesis. American Ethnologist, 20, 312-335.
6. Connell, R. W. (1997). Why is classical theory classical? American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1511-1557.
7. Feinberg, R. (1988). Margaret Mead and Samoa: Coming of age in fact and fiction. American Anthropologist, 90, 656-663.
8. Fields, K. E. (1995). Translator's introduction. In Émile Durkheim, The elementary forms of the religious life (pp. xxxi, lix, xxiii). New York: The Free Press.
9. Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10. Gordon, R. (1988). Apartheid's anthropologists: The genealogy of Afrikaner anthropology. American Ethnologist, 15, 535-553.
11. Handler, R. (1993). Anthropology is dead! Long live anthropology!" American Anthropologist, 95, 991-995.
12. Halfpenny, P. (1991). Review of D. Ross (1991) The origins of American social science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Herskovits, M. (1948). Man and his works (p. 17). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
14. Jones, R. A. (1994). Ambivalent cartesians: Durkheim, Montesquieu, and method. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 8, 15, 24, 36.
15. Kaesler, D. (1999, January). Why (still) history of sociology? RCHS Newsletter, 2-7.
16. Keesing, R., & Strathern, A. (1998). Cultural anthropology (3rd ed., p. 2). New York: Harcourt Brace.
17. Kehoe, A. B. (1998). Humans (pp. xi, 202-205). New York and London: Routledge.
18. Kottak, C. (1982). Cultural anthropology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
19. Kuklick, H. (1996). Islands in the Pacific: Darwinian biogeography and British anthropology. American Ethnologist, 23, 611-638.
20. LaBarre, W. (1954). The human animal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Lehmann, J. M. (1995). The question of caste in modern society: Durkheim's contradictory theories of race, class, and sex. American Sociological Review, 60, 566-585.
22. Light, D., Keller, S., & Calhoun, C. (1989). Sociology (5th ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
23. Lukes, S. (1973). Émile Durkheim: His life and work. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
24. Macionis, J. J. (1993). Sociology (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Marshall, M. (1993). The wizard from Oz meets the wicked witch from the east: Freeman, Mead, and ethnographic authority. American Ethnologist, 20, 604-617.
26. Ogburn, W. F., & Nimkoff, M. F. (1950). Sociology (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
27. Pescosolido, B. A. & Georgianna, S. (1989). Durkheim, suicide, and religion: Toward a network theory of suicide. American Sociological Review, 54, 33-48.
28. Platt, J. (1995). The United States reception of Durkheim's The rules of sociological method. Sociological Perspectives, 38, 77-105.
29. Porter, T. (1992). Comment on Margaret Schabas's, "Breaking away: History of economics as history of science." History of Political Economy, 24, 235.
30. Rosman, A., & Rubel, P. (1995). The tapestry of culture (5th ed.) (pp. 1-4). New York: McGraw Hill.
31. Smith, P., & Alexander, J. C. (1996). Review essay: Durkheim's religious revival. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 585-591.
32. Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1965, 1968). On the limits of "presentism" and "historicism" in the historiography of the behavioral sciences. Originally printed in Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1, 211-218.
33. Reprinted in Race, culture, and evolution (pp. 1-12). New York: The Free Press.
34. Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1968). Matthew Arnold, E. B. Tylor, and the uses of invention. In Race, culture, and evolution (pp. 69-90). New York: The Free Press.
35. Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1995). After Tylor: British social anthropology, 1888-1951 (p. xviii). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
36. Tooker, E. (1992). Lewis H. Morgan and his contemporaries. American Anthropologist, 94, 357-375.
37. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists (pp. 78-79). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
38. Turner, J. H. (1986). Editor's introduction. In R. A. Jones (Ed.), Émile Durkheim. An introduction to four major works (p. 7). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
39. van Poppel, F., & Day, L. H. (1996). A test of Durkheim's theory of suicide - without committing the "ecological fallacy." American Sociological Review, 61, 500-507.
40. Vermeulen, H. F., & Roldán, A. A. (1995). Introduction to Fieldwork and footnotes (p. 12). London: Routledge.
41. Vincent, J. (1990). Anthropology and politics. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
42. Weisberger, A. M. (1992). The origins of American social science. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1529-30.