Magnetoencephalography: A new functional diagnostic technique for the neurosciences;Magnetoencefalografia: Una nueva tecnica de diagnostico funcional en neurociencia

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 1077-1090

  Maestu C ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE LA PRINCESA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Clinical applications; Electroencephalography; Evoked fields; History; Magnetoencephalography; Review; Super conducting Quantum Interference Device

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN DISEASE; BRAIN FUNCTION; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FUNCTION TEST; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETISM; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; TREATMENT INDICATION; BRAIN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HISTORY; INSTRUMENTATION; NEUROSCIENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW;

BRAIN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HISTORY, 17TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HISTORY, ANCIENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROSCIENCES;

EID: 0033141598     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.2811.98153     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Sodi Pallarés D. Magnetoterapia y tratamiento metabólico. México: Sodi Pallarés eds; 1994. p. 2-6.
2. Helmoltz H. Über einige Gesetze der verteilung elektrischer Ströme in Körperlicher Leitern mit Anwendung auf die tierisch-elektrische Versuche. Ann Phys Chem 1853; 89: 211-33, 353-77.
3. Ukhtomsky AA. Call works. Moscow: Leningrad, Publishing house of the USSR Academy of Science; 1954. p. 5.
4. Seipel JH, Morrow RD. The magnetic field accompanying neuronal activity: a new for the study of the nervous system. J Was Acad Sci 1960; 50: 1-4.
5. Baule GM, McFee R. Detection of the magnetic field of the heart. Am Heart J 1963; 66: 95-6.
6. Cohen D. Magnetoencephalography: evidence of magnetic fields produced by alpha-rhythm currents. Science 1968; 161: 784-6.
7. Zimmerman JE, Thiene P, Harding JT. Design and operation os stable rf-biased superconducting point contact, quantum devices and a note on the properties of perfectly clean metal contacts. J Appl Phys 1970; 41: 1572-80.
8. Josephson BD. Possible new effects in superconductive tunneling. Phys Lett 1962; 1: 251.
9. Cohen D. Magnetoencephalography: detection of the brain's electrical activity with a superconducting magnetometer. Science 1972; 175: 664-6.
10. Ahopelto J, Karp PJ, Katila TE, Lukander A, Makipaa P. Biomagnetic measurements using the gradiometer technique. Intl Conf on Biomedical Transducers 1974; Book of abstracts: 1347.
11. Brenner D, Williamson SJ, Kaufmann L. Visually evoked magnetic fields of the human brain. Science 1975; 190: 480-2.
12. Hughes JR, Hendrix DE, Cohen J, Duffy FH, Mayman CI, Scholl ML, et al. Relationship of the magnetoencephalogram to the electroencephalogram: normal wake and sleep activity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1976; 40: 261-78.
13. Reite M, Zimmerman JE, Edrich J, Zimmerman J. The human Magnetoencephalogram: some EEG and related correlations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1976; 40: 59-66.
14. Brenner D, Lipton J, Kaufmann L, Williamson SJ. Somatically evoked magnetic fields of the human brain. Science 1978; 199: 81-3.
15. Clarke J. Fluctuactions analysis. SQUID, 80: superconducting quantum interference devices and their applications. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 1980. p. 187-205.
16. Hamalainen M, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Reinikainen K. Analysis of magnetoencephalographic obtained with a four channel SQUID magnetometer. Biomagnetism: applications/theory. New York: Pergamon Press; 1985. p. 299-303.
17. th Cryogenic Engineering Conference ICEC-II. Guidford, England; Butterworth: 1986. p. 820-4.
18. Crum D. Design and use of dewars in biomagnetism measurements. Biomagnetism: applications/theory. New York: Pergamon Press; 1985. p. 21-8.
19. Hämäläinen M. 24 channel planar gradiometer: system, design and analysis of neuromagnetic data. Advances in Biomagnetism. New York: Plenum Press; 1989. p. 639-44.
20. nd workshop on high-temperature superconducting electronics workshop. Shikade, Hokkaido, Japan: Association for future electronic devices; 1989. p. 219-22.
21. Sutherling WW, Nakasato N, Muresan L, Binet I, Baumgartner C, Barth D. Comparison of EEG-EcoG, MRI and 7 vs 31-channels of MEG for non-invasive localization of the somatosensory evoked response. Biomagnetism: clinical aspects. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1992. p. 233-6.
22. Hari R. Comment: MEG in the study of epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand 1994; 152 (Suppl): 89-90.
23. Hari R. Human cortical functions revealed by magnetoencephalography. Progr Brain Res 1994; 100: 163-8.
24. Tesche CD. Non-invasive imaging of neuronal population dynamics in human thalamus. Brain Res 1996; 729: 253-8.
25. Vrba J, Haid G, Lee S, Taylor A, Fife A, Kubik P, et al. Biomagnetometers for unshielded and well-shielded environments. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1991; 12 (Suppl b): 81-6.
26. Lounasmaa OV. Experimental principles and methods below IK. London: Academic; 1974.
27. Okada YC, Williamson JS, Kaufmann L. Magnetic field of the human sensorimotor cortex. Intern J Neurosci 1982; 17: 33-8.
28. Swinney KR, Wiskwo JP. A calculation of the magnetic field of a Nerve Action Potential. Biophys J 1980; 32: 719-31.
29. Lorente de No R. A study of nerve physiology. Part II. New York: Rockefeller Institute; 1947. p. 132.
30. Llinás R, Nicholson C. Analysis of field potentials in the Nervous Central System. Handbook of EEG and Clin Neurophysiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1974 (Suppl 2b). p. 61-83.
31. Lewine JD, Orrison WW. Spike and Slow Wave localization by magnetoencephalography. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1995; 5: 575-6.
32. Kandell E, Schwartz J, Hessel T. Principles of Neural Science. New York: Appleton & Lange; 1991. p. 7-13.
33. Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi R, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV. Magnetoencephalography, theory, instrumentation and applications to non-invasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 1993; 65: 413-98.
34. Clarke J, Goubau WM, Ketchen MB. Tunnel junction DC-SQUID: fabrication, operation and performance. J Low Temp Ohys 1976; 25: 99.