|
|
Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 153-157
|
|
Commentary: a critique of Clark's frightening xenotransplantion scenario.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
ANIMAL;
ART;
ARTICLE;
COMMUNICABLE DISEASE;
ETHICS;
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY;
ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION;
POLICY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIMATE;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
SWINE;
TRANSGENIC ANIMAL;
TRANSPLANTATION;
UNITED STATES;
XENOGRAFT;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
ANIMALS;
ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED;
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY;
COMMUNICABLE DISEASES;
ETHICS;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
GUIDELINES;
HUMAN BODY;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION;
PRIMATES;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
SWINE;
TRANSPLANTATION;
TRANSPLANTATION, HETEROLOGOUS;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
|
|
EID: 0033139309
PISSN: 10731105
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1999.tb01447.x Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (15)
|
|
References (0)
|
