Ideological implications of paradigm discourse

Nursing Inquiry

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 123-131

  Thorne, Sally E ^a   Kirkham, Sheryl Reimer ^a   Henderson, Angela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discourse; Kuhn; Nursing education; Nursing research; Nursing theory; Paradigm

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; NURSING CARE; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHILOSOPHY; REVIEW; SEMANTICS;

EDUCATION, NURSING; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; NURSING CARE; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PHILOSOPHY, NURSING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0033138447     PISSN: 13207881     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.1999.00016.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Monty Python's Flying Circus. The argument clinic [video cassette recording]. USA: Paramount, 1972.
2. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
3. Lupton D. Discourse analysis: a new methodology for understanding the ideologies of health and illness. Australian Journal of Public Health 1992; 16: 145-150.
4. Ball T & Dagger R. Political Ideologies and the Democratic Ideal, 2nd edn. New York: Harper Collins, 1995.
5. Purvis T & Hunt A. Discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology ... British Journal of Sociology 1993; 44: 473-499.
6. Taylor JS. Nursing ideology: identification and legitimation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997; 25: 442-446.
7. Cheek J & Gibson T. The discursive construction of the role of the nurse in medication administration: an exploration of the literature. Nursing Inquiry 1996; 3: 83-90.
8. Adams T. The idea of revolution in the development of nursing theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1991; 16: 1487-1491.
9. Robinson JJA. Problems with paradigms in a caring profession. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1992; 17: 632-638.
10. Atkinson P. Some perils of paradigms. Qualitative Health Research 1995; 5: 117-124.
11. Haase JE & Taylor Myers S. Reconciling paradigm assumptions or qualitative and quantitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research 1988; 10: 129-137.
12. Jones Porter E. The qualitative-quantitative dualism. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1988; 21: 98-102.
13. Moccia P. A critique of compromise: Beyond the methods debate. Advances in Nursing Science 1988; 10: 1-9.
14. Dzurec LC. The necessity for and evolution of multiple paradigms for nursing research: a poststructuralist perspective. Advances in Nursing Science 1989; 11: 69-77.
15. Dzurec LC & Abraham IL. The nature of inquiry: Linking quantitative and qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science 1993; 16: 73-79.
16. Lincoln YS. Sympathetic connections between qualitative methods and health research. Qualitative Health Research 1992; 2: 375-391.
17. Andersen JM. Current directions in nursing research: Towards a poststructuralist and feminist epistemology. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 1991; 23: 1-3.
18. DeMarco R, Campbell J & Wuest J. Feminist critique: Searching for meaning in research. Advances in Nursing Science 1993; 16: 26-38.
19. Fahy K. Postmodern feminist emancipatory research: Is it an oxymoron? Nursing Inquiry 1997; 4: 27-33.
20. Heslop L. The (im) possibilities of poststructuralist and critical social nursing inquiry. Nursing Inquiry 1997; 4: 48-56.
21. Kellett UM. Heideggerian phenomenology: an approach to understanding family caring for an older relative. Nursing Inquiry 1997; 4: 57-65.
22. Walker K. Cutting edges: Deconstructive inquiry and the mission of the border ethnographer. Nursing Inquiry 1997; 4: 3-13.
23. Darbyshire P. Qualitative research: is it becoming a new orthodoxy? Nursing Inquiry 1997; 4: 1-2.
24. Alcoff L. The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique 1991; Winter: 5-31.
25. Allen DG. Feminism, relativism, and the philosophy of science: An overview. In: Thompson J, Allen DG & Rodriguez-Fisher L (eds). Critique, Resistance and Action: Working Papers in the Politics of Nursing. New York: National League for Nursing Press, 1992; 1-20.
26. Morrow RA & Brown DD. Critical Theory and Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
27. Jacox AK & Webster G. Competing theories of science. In: Nicoll LH (ed). Perspectives on Nursing Theory. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1997; 423-431.
28. Bevis E & Watson J. Toward a Caring Curriculum: A New Pedagogy for Nursing. New York: National League for Nursing, 1989.
29. Varcoe C. The revolution never ends: Challenges of praxis for nursing education. In: Thorne S & Hayes V (eds). Nursing Praxis: Knowledge and Action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997; 180-200.
30. Bevis E. All in all, it was a pretty good funeral. Journal of Nursing Education 1993; 32: 101-105.
31. Diekelmann N. Curriculum revolution: A theoretical and philosophical mandate for change. Curriculum Revolution: Mandate for Change. New York: National League for Nursing, 1988; 137-158.
32. Tanner C. Reflections on the curriculum revolution. Journal of Nursing Education 1990; 29: 295-299.
33. Moccia P. No sire, it's a revolution. Journal of Nursing Education 1990; 29: 307-311.
34. Newman MA. Theory for nursing practice. Nursing Science Quarterly 1994; 7: 153-157.
35. Parse RR, Coyne AB & Smith MJ. Nursing research: Qualitative methods. Bowie, MD: Brady, 1985.
36. Parse KR, Nursing Science: Major Paradigms, Theories, and Critiques. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1987.
37. Cody WK. About all those paradigms: Many in the universe, two in nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly 1995; 8: 114-117.
38. Cody WK. Occult reductionism in the discourse of nursing theory. Nursing Science Quarterly 1996; 9: 140-142.
39. Nagle LM & Mitchell GJ. Theoretic diversity: Evolving paradigmatic issues in research and practice. Advances in Nursing Science 1991; 14: 17-25.
40. Ramos MC. Adopting an evolutionary lens: an optimistic approach to discovering strength in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science 1987; 19: 19-26.
41. Copnell B. Synthesis in nursing knowledge: an analysis of two approaches. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1998; 27: 870-874.
42. King IM. Nursing Science Quarterly 1997; 19: 111 (letter to the editor).
43. Parse RR. The art of criticism. Nursing Science Quarterly 1998; 11: 43.