Mothers', fathers', and siblings' responses to children's language errors: Comparing sources of negative evidence

Journal of Child Language

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 373-391

  Strapp, Chehalis M ^a  

^a WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FATHER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; MOTHER; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SIBLING RELATION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTITUDE; CHILD LANGUAGE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FATHERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTHERS; SIBLING RELATIONS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0033137295     PISSN: 03050009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0305000999003827     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barton, M. E. & Tomasello, M. (1991). Joint attention and conversation in mother-infant-sibling triads. Child Development 62, 517-29.
2. Barton, M. E. & Tomasello, M. (1994). The rest of the family: the role of fathers and siblings in early language development. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (eds), Input and interaction in language acquisition (100-34). Cambridge: C.U.P.
3. Berman, R. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. I. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bohannon, J. N., MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. (1991). No negative evidence revisited: beyond learnability or who has to prove what to whom. Developmental Psychology 26, 221-6.
5. Bohannon, J. N. & Stanowicz, L. (1988). The issue of negative evidence: adult responses to children's language errors. Developmental Psychology 24, 684-9.
6. Bohannon, J. N. & Stanowicz, L. (1989). Bi-directional effects of repetition in conversation: a synthesis within a cognitive model. In K. Nelson & G. Speidal (eds), The many faces of imitation in language learning. New York: Springer Verlag.
7. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Brown, R. & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In J. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the development of language (11-55). New York: Wiley.
9. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Clancy, P. (1989). Form and function in the acquisition of Korean wh-questions. Journal of Child Language 16, 323-47.
11. Demetras, M. J., Post, K. N. & Snow, C. E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: the role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language 13, 275-92.
12. Erbaugh, M. S. (1992). The acquisition of Mandarin. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. III. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Farrar, M. J. (1990). Discourse and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 17, 607-24.
14. Farrar, M. J. (1992). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology 28, 91-9.
15. Golinkoff, R. M. & Ames, G. (1979). A comparison of fathers' and mothers' speech with their young children. Child Development 50, 28-32.
16. Gordon, P. (1991). Learnability and feedback. Developmental Psychology 26, 217-20.
17. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Treiman, R. & Schneiderman, M. (1984). Brown and Hanlon revisited: mothers' sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. Journal of Child Language 11, 81-8.
18. Howe, C. J. (1993). Language learning : a special case for developmental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
19. Hyams, N. (1992). A reanalysis of null subjects in child language. In J. Weissenborn, J. Goodluck & T. Roeper (eds). Theoretical issues in language acquisition : continuity and change in development. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
20. Lampert, M. D. & Erwin-Tripp, S. M. (1993). Structured coding for the study of language and social interaction. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (eds), Talking data : transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
21. Lieven, E. V. M. (1994). Crosslinguistic and cross-cultural aspects of language addressed to children. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.
22. Mannle, S. & Tomasello, M. (1987). Fathers, siblings and the bridge hypotheses. In K. E. Nelson and A. van Kleeck (eds), Children's language: Vol. VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Marcus, G. E. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition 46, 53-85.
24. Markman, E. M. (1992). Constraints on word learning: speculations about their nature, origins, and domain specificity. In M. R. Gunnar & M. P. Maratsos (eds), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology: Vol. 25. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Nelson, K. E. (1987). Some observations from the perspective of the rare event cognitive comparison theory of syntax acquisition. In K. E. Nelson & A. van Kleeck (eds), Children's language: Vol. VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Nelson, K. E. (1991). On differentiated language learning models and differentiated interventions. In N. Krasnegor, D. Rumbaugh & R. Schiefelbusch (eds), Language acquisition : biological and behavioural determinants. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
27. Penner, S. G. (1987). Parental responses to grammatical and ungrammatical child utterances. Child Development 58, 376-384.
28. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Post, K. N. (1995). Negative evidence in the language learning environment of laterborns in a rural Florida community. In K. E. Nelson & Z. Reger (eds), Children's language; Vol. 8. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
30. Rice, M. L. (1990). Preschooler's QUIL: quick incidental learning of words. In G. ContiRamsden & C. Snow (eds), Children's language: Vol. 7. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Rondal, J. A. (1985). Adult-child interaction and the process of language acquisition. New York: Prager.
32. Saxton, M. (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language 24, 139-61.
33. Shriberg, L. D. & Kent, R. D. (1982). Clinical phonetics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
34. Shriberg, L. D., Kwiatkowski, J. & Hoffman, K. (1984). A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27, 456-65.
35. Sokolov, J. L. (1991, April). A reverse analysis of implicit negative evidence: exact, expanded and reduced parental imitations. Paper presented at Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.
36. Sokolov, J. L. & Snow, C. E. (1994). The changing role of negative evidence theories of language development. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (eds), Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.
37. Strapp, C. M. (1993). The development of syntax in toddlers : the role of older sibling's linguistic input. Unpublished masters thesis. University of Nevada, Reno.
38. Tomasello, M., Farrar, M. J. & Dines, J. (1983). Young children's speech revisions for a familiar and an unfamiliar adult. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27, 359-63.
39. Tomasello, M. & Mannle, S. (1985). Pragmatics of sibling speech to one-year-olds. Child Development 56, 911-917.
40. Wellen, C. J. (1985). Effects of older sibling on the language young children hear and produce. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 50, 84-99.