Presenting inequations in mathematical proofs

Information Sciences

Volumn 116, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 3-23

  Fehrer, Detlef ^a   Horacek, Helmut ^b  

^a SICK AG   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

THEOREM PROVING;

MACHINE GENERATED PROOFS;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 0033132555     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-0255(98)10094-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. C. Benzmüller, L. Cheikhrouhou, D. Fehrer, A. Fiedler, X. Huang, M. Kerber, M. Kohlhase, K. Konrad, A. Meier, E. Melis, W. Schaarschmidt, J. Siekmann, V. Sorge, ΩMEGA: Towards a Mathematical Assistant, in: W. McCune (Ed.), Automated Deduction - CADE-14, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automated Deduction (July 1997), No. 1249 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Townsville, North Queensland, Australia, Springer, Berlin, pp. 252-255.
2. J. Denzinger, S. Schulz, Analysis and representation of equational proofs generated by a distributed completion based proof system. SEKI Report SR-94-05, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern, 1994.
3. D. Fehrer, H. Horacek, Exploiting the addressee's inferential capabilities in presenting mathematical proofs, in: M.E. Pollack (Ed.), IJCAI-97, Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nagoya, Japan, August 1997, vol. 2, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, pp. 959-964.
4. G. Gentzen, Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen I. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39 (1935).
5. H. Horacek, A model for adapting explanations to the user's likely inferences, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 7 (1997) 1-55.
6. H. Horacek, Generating Inference-Rich Discourse Through Revisions of RST-Trees, in: AAAI-98/IAAI-98 Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Tenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, July 1998, AAAI Press/ MIT Press, pp. 814-820.
7. X. Huang, PROVERB: A system explaining machine-found proofs, in: A. Ram, K. Eiselt (Eds.), Proceedings of 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Atlanta, USA, 1994, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, pp. 427-432.
8. X. Huang, Reconstructing proofs at the assertion level, in: A. Bundy (Ed.), Automated Deduction - CADE-12, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Nancy, France, Berlin, 1994, No. 814 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, pp. 788-792.
9. X. Huang, Human oriented proof presentation: a reconstructive approach, No. 112 in DISKI. Infix, 1996.
10. X. Huang, Translating machine-generated resolution proofs into ND-proofs at the assertion level, in: N. Foo, R. Goebel (Eds.), Proceedings of PRICAI-96 (1996), LNAI 1114, Springer, Berlin, pp. 399-410.
11. X. Huang, A. Fiedler, Paraphrasing and aggregating argumentative texts using text structure, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Natural Language Generation Workshop, 1996.
12. X. Huang, A. Fiedler, Presenting machine-found proofs, in: Proceedings of the 13th CADE, 1996.
13. X. Huang, M. Kerber, M. Kohlhase, E. Melis, D. Nesmith, J. Richts, J. Siekmann, Ω-MKRP, a proof development environment, in: A. Bundy (Ed.), Automated Deduction - CADE-12, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Nancy, France, Berlin, 1994, No. 814 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, pp. 788-792.
14. X. Huang, A. Meier, Natural deduction proofs can be as short as resolution proofs, SEKI report, to appear.
15. C. Lingenfelder, Transformation and Structuring of Computer Generated proofs, SEKI Report SR-90-26, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern, 1990.
16. C. Lingenfelder, A. Präcklein, Presentation of proofs in an equational calculus, SEKI Report SR-90-15, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern, 1990.
17. H. Lüneburg, Vorlesungen über Analysis, BI Wissenschaftsverlag, 1981.
18. W. McCune, Otter 3.0 reference manual and guide. Tech. Rep. ANL-94/6, Argonne National Laboratory, 1994.
19. W. Pierce, Toward mechanical methods for streamlining proofs, in: M.E. Stickel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction (July 1990), No. 449 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, pp. 351-365.
20. G. Robinson, L. Wos, Paramodulation and theorem proving in first order theories with equality, in: Machine Intelligence, vol. 4, Elsevier, New York, 1969, pp. 135-150.
21. J.A. Robinson, Automated deduction with hyper-resolution, Int. J. of Comp. Math. 1 (1965) 227-234.
22. R.E. Shostak, Refutation graphs, Artificial Intelligence 7 (1976) 51-64.
23. M. Thüring, K. Wender, Über kausale Inferenzen beim Lesen, Sprache und Kognition 2 (1985) 76-86.
24. I. Zukerman, R. McConachy, Generating concise discourse that adresses a user's inferences, in: Proceedings of IJCAI-93, Chambery, France, 1993, pp. 1202-1207.