Computerized assessment of depression and anxiety over the telephone using interactive voice response

M.D. Computing

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 64-68

  Kobak, Kenneth A ^a   Greist, John H ^a   Jefferson, James W ^a   Mundt, James C ^a   Katzelnick, David J ^a  

^a Healthcare Technology Systems Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SECURITY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING; ONLINE SYSTEM; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; TELEPHONE;

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY DISORDERS; COMPUTER SECURITY; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TELEPHONE;

EID: 0033129313     PISSN: 07246811     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 3:56-62.
2. Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychiatry 1967; 6:278-96.
3. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959; 32:50-5.
4. Hamilton M. Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. Br J Psychiatry 1967; 3:76-9.
5. Hedlund JL, Vieweg BW. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: A comprehensive review. J Oper Psychiatry 1979; 10:149-61.
6. Maier W, Buller R, Philipp M, Heuser I. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders. J Affective Disord 1988; 14:61-8.
7. Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, revised. Rockville, MD, National Institute of Mental Health, US Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare publication ADM 1976; 76-338.
8. Elkin I, Shea MT, Watkins JT. National Institute of Mental Health treatment of depression collaborative research program. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46:971-83.
9. Carroll BJ, Feinberg M, Smouse PE, Rawson SG, Greden JFF. The Carroll Rating Scale for Depression: I. Development, reliability and validation. Br J Psychiatry 1981; 138:194-200.
10. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134:382-9.
11. Reynolds WM, Kobak KA. Development and validation of the Hamilton Depression Inventory: A self-report version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Psychol Assessment 1995; 7:472-83.
12. Demitrack MA, Faries D, DeBrota D, Potter WZ. The problem of measurement error in multisite clinical trials. Psychopharmacol Bull 1997; 33:513.
13. Bech P, Kastrup M, Rafaelsen OJ. Minicompendium of rating scales for anxiety, depression, mania, schizophrenia with corresponding DSM-III syndromes. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1986; 73 (suppl. 326): 23-38.
14. Kobak KA, Schaettle S, Katzelnick DJ, Simon G. Guidelines for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: modified for the Depression in Primary Care Study. Madison, WI, Dean Foundation, 1995.
15. Miller IW, Bishop S, Norman WH, Maddever H. The modified Hamilton Depression Rating Scale for Depression: reliability and validity. Psychiatry Res 1985; 14:131-42.
16. Potts MK, Daniels M, Burnham MA, Well KB. A structured interview version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: evidence of reliability and versatility of administration. J Psychiatr Res 1990; 24:335-50.
17. Whisman MA, Strosahl K, Fruzzetti AE, Schmaling KB, Jacobson NS, Miller DM. A structured interview version of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: Reliability and validity. Psychol Assess 1989; 1:238-41.
18. Williams JBW. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45:742-7.
19. Hooijer C, Zitman EG, Griez E., van Trilburg W, Willemse A, Dinkgreve MAHM. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS): Changes in scores as a function of training and version used. J Affective Disord 1991; 22:21-9.
20. Kobak KA, Reynolds WM, Rosenfeld R, Greist JH. Development and validation of a computer-administered Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Psychol Assess 1990; 2:56-63.
21. Kobak KA, Reynolds WM, Greist JH. Development and validation of a computer-administered version of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Psychol Assess 1993; 5:487-92.
22. Lucas RW, Mullins PJ, Luna CB, McInroy DC. Psychiatrists and a computer as interrogators of patients with alcohol-related illnesses: A comparison. Br J Psychiatry 1977; 131:160-7.
23. Skinner HA, Allen BA. Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face to face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug and tobacco use. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51:267-75.
24. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science 1998; 280:867-73.
25. Petrie K, Abell W. Responses of parasuicides to a computerized interview. Comput Hum Behav 1994; 10:415-18.
26. Greist JH, Gustafson DH, Stauss FF, Rowse GL, Laughren TP, Chiles JA. A computer interview for suicide-risk prevention. Am J Psychiatry 1973; 130:1327-32.
27. Greist JH, Klein MH. Computer programs for patients, clinicians, and researchers in psychiatry. In JB Sidowski, JH Johnson, and TA Williams, eds., Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex 1980; 161-82.
28. Katzelnick DJ, Kobak KA, Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Mantle JM, Serlin RC. Sertraline for social phobia: A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1368-71.
29. Kobak KA, Schaettle SC, Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Katzelnick DJ, Dottl SL. Computer interview assessment of social phobia in a clinical drug trial. Depress Anxiety 1998; 7:97-104.
30. Leber P. Speed of onset. Psychopharmacol Bull 1995; 31:37-40.
31. Mundt JC, Kobak KA, Taylor LvH, et al. Development and validation of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale implementation via interactive voice response. MD Computing 1998; 15:31-9.
32. First MB, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibbon M. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0), 1995, New York.
33. Beck AT, Ward C, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 6:561-71.
34. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988; 56:893-7.
35. Honaker LM. The equivalency of computerized and conventional MMPI administration: a critical review. Clin Psychol Rev 1988; 8:561-77.
36. Kobak KA, Reynolds WM, Greist JH. Computerized and clinician assessment of depression and anxiety: Respondent evaluation and satisfaction. J Pers Assess 1994; 63:173-80.
37. Fergusen GA. Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. New York, NY: McGraw Hill 1976.
38. Hofer PJ, Green BF. The challenge of competence and creativity in computerized psychological testing. J Consult Clin Psychol 1985; 53:826-38.
39. Kobak KA, Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Katzelnick DJ. The Utility of the IVR Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in a Multi-Site Depression Trial: A Feasability Study. National Institute of Mental Health, New Clinical Drug Evaluation Unit, 38th Annual Meeting, June 1998, Boca Raton, FL.
40. Kobak KA, Greist JH, Jefferson JH, Katzelnick DJ. Computer-administered clinical rating scales: A review. Psychopharmacol 1996; 127:291-301.
41. Chappell PB, Kobak KA, Greist R. Computerized Telephone Assessment of Generalized Anxiety in a Clinical Drug Trial: A Feasability Study. National Institute of Mental Health, New Clinical Drug Evaluation Unit, 38th Annual Meeting, June 1998, Boca Raton, FL.
42. Baer L, Jacobs DG, Cukor P, O'Laughlen J, Coyle JT, Magruder KM. Automated telephone screening survey for depression. JAMA 1995; 273:1943-4.
43. Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Wenzel K, et al. Telephone assessment program: Efficient patient monitoring and clinician feedback. MD Computing 1997; 14:382-7.