Methods to assess the welfare of domestic animals;Les méthodes d'appréciation du bien-être des animaux d'élevage

Productions Animales

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 113-121

  Veissier, I ^a   Sarignac, C ^b   Capdeville, J ^c  

^a UMR1213 HERBIVORES   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c Institut de l'Elevage   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033128356     PISSN: 09900632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Baldwin B.A., Start I.E., 1981. Sensory reinforcement and illumination preference in sheep and calves. Proc. Royal Society London, B 211, 513-526.
2. Baldwin B.A., Start I.E., 1985. Illumination preferences of pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 14, 233-243.
3. Barnouin J., Geromegnace N., Chassagne M., Dorr N., Sabatier P., 1999. Facteurs structurels de variation des niveaux de comptage cellulaire du lait et de fréquence des mammites cliniques dans 560 élevages bovins répartis dans 21 départements français. INRA Prod. Anim., 12, 39-48.
4. Baxter M.R., 1982. The nesting behaviour of sows and its disturbance by confinement at farrowing. Hohenheimer Arbeiten, 121, 101-114.
5. Bisgaard Madsen E., 1987. Tail tip inflammation in young fattening bulls on slatted floor. In: M.C. Schlichting et D. Smidt, Welfare Aspects of housing Systems for Veal Calves and Fattening Bulls, 131-139. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
6. Blancheteau M., 1975. Les limites éthologiques de la possibilité de liaison conditionnelle. Ann. Psychol., 75, 493-512.
7. Boissy A., Le Neindre P., 1997. Behavioral, cardiac and cortisol responses to brief separation and reunion in cattle. Physiol. Behav., 61, 693-699.
8. Bouissou M.F., 1980. La réduction du stress en élevage par action sur l'environnement physique et social. Bull. GTV, 80, 5-14.
9. Broom D.M., 1987. Applications of neurobiological studies to farm animal welfare. In: P.R. Wiepkema and P.W.M. Van Adrichem (eds), Biology of stress in farm animals: an integrative approach, 101-110. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster.
10. CIGR, 1994. The design of dairy cow housing. Report of the CIGR Section II. Working Group Cattle Housing, 51 p.
11. Dantzer R., Mormède P., 1979. Le stress en élevage intensif. Masson, Paris/Barcelone/Milan/Mexico, 117 p.
12. Dawkins M.S., 1983a. La souffrance animale. Editions du Point Vétérinaire, Maisons-Alfort, 152 p.
13. Dawkins M.S., 1983b. Battery hens name their price: consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological "needs". Anim. Behav., 31, 1195-1205.
14. De Wilt J.G., 1985. Behaviour and welfare of veal calves in relation to husbandry systems. IMAG, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 137 p.
15. Dellmeier G.R., Friend T.H., Gbur E.E., 1985. Comparison of four methods of calf confinement. II. Behavior. J. Anim. Sci., 60, 1102-1109.
16. Dumelow J., 1987. Development of a new design of cattle feeding barrier. Farm Build. Engine., 4, 25-27.
17. Du Mesnil Du Buisson F., Signoret J.P., 1962. Influence de facteurs externes sur le déclenchement de la puberté chez la truie. Ann. Zootech., 11, 53-59.
18. Duncan I.J.H., 1979. Some studies on heart-rate and behaviour in the domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 5, 294-295.
19. Farm Animal Welfare Council, 1992. FAWC updates the five freedoms. Vet. Rec., 131, 357.
20. Faure J.M., Lagadic H., 1989. Space requirements of caged layers. In: A.R. Kuijt D.A. Ehlhardt and H.J. Blokhuis (eds), Alternative Improved Housing Systems for Poultry, 79-89. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
21. Fraser D., 1995. Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the 'inextricable connection. Anim. Welf., 4, 103-117.
22. Friend T.H., Gwazdauskas F.C., Polan C.E., 1979. Change in adrenal response from free stall competition. J. Dairy Sci., 62, 768-771.
23. Friend T.H., Dellmeier G.R., Gbur E.E., 1985. Comparison of four methods of calf confinement. I. Physiology. J. Anim. Sci., 60, 1095-1101.
24. Gesmier V., 1996. Adaptation comportementale des veaux de boucherie à différents logements. Thèse de l'Université de Rennes I, 86 p.
25. Hasegawa N., Nishiwaki A., Sugawara K., Ito I., 1997. The effects of social exchange between two groups of lactating primiparous heifers on milk production, dominance order, behavior and adrenocortical response. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 51, 15-27.
26. Johnson H.D., Vanjonack W.J., 1976. Effects of environmental and other stressors on blood hormone patterns in lactating animals. J. Dairy Sci., 59, 1603-1617.
27. Mason J.W., 1971. A re-evaluation of the concept of 'non-specificity' in stress theory. J. Psychiat. Res., 8, 323-333.
28. Mason G.J., 1991. Stereotypies: a critical review. Anim. Behav., 41, 1015-1037.
29. Mormède P., 1995. Le stress: interaction animal-homme-environnement. Cah. Agric., 4, 275-286.
30. Orgeur P., Mavric N., Yvoré P., Bernard S., Nowak R., Schaal B., Levy F., 1998. Artificial weaning in sheep: consequences on behavioural, hormonal and immunopathological indicators of welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 58, 87-103.
31. Payne J.M., 1989. Metabolic and nutritional diseases of cattle. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 149 p.
32. Stolba A., Wood-Gush D.G.M., 1984. The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. Ann. Rech. Vet., 15, 287-298.
33. Terlouw C., 1993. Environmental and individual factors contributing to the occurence of stereotypies in female pigs (Sus scrofa). Thesis, 179 p.
34. Veissier I., 1996. Intérêts de l'analyse comportementale dans les études de bien-être: le cas des veaux de boucherie. INRA Prod. Anim., 9, 103-111.
35. Veissier I., Chazal P., Pradel P., Le Neindre P., 1997. Providing social contacts and objects for nibbling moderates reactivity and oral behaviors in veal calves. J. Anim. Sci., 75, 356-365.