Use of magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosis of portosystemic shunts in dogs

Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 251-258

  Seguin, Bernard ^a   Tobias, Karen M ^a   Gavin, Patrick R ^a   Tucker, Russell L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Dogs; Magnetic resonance angiography; Portosystemic shunts

Indexed keywords

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DOG; DOG DISEASE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PORTAL VEIN; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALS; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PORTAL SYSTEM; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033127620     PISSN: 10588183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.1999.tb00357.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Swalec KM. Portosystemic shunts. In: Bojrab MJ. Disease mechanisms in small animal surgery, 2nd ed Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1993.
2. Koblik PD, Hornof WJ. Transcolonic sodium pertechnetate Tc-99m scintigraphy for diagnosis of macrovascular portosystemic shunts in dogs, cats, and potbellied pigs: 176 cases (1988-1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;207:729-733.
3. Boothe HW, Howe LM, Edwards JF, Slater MR. Multiple extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs: 30 cases (1981-1993). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:1849-1854.
4. Komtebedde J, Forsyth SP, Breznock EM, Koblik PD. Intrahepatic portosystemic venous anomaly in the dog. Perioperative management and complications. Vet Surg 1991;20:37-42.
5. Whiting PG, Peterson SL. Portosystemic shunts. In: Slatter D. Textbook of small animal surgery, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993.
6. Schermerhorn T, Center SA, Dykes NL et al. Characterization of hepatoportal microvascular dysplasia in a kindred of Cairn Terriers. J Vet Intern Med 1996;10:219-230.
7. Moon ML. Diagnostic imaging of portosystemic shunts. Sem Vet Med Surg 1990;5:120-126.
8. Wrigley RH, Konde LJ, Park LD, Lebel JL. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of portocaval shunts in young dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987; 191:421-424.
9. 99mTechnetium pertechnetate to diagnose portosystemic shunts in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 1991;5:23-27.
10. 99mTechnetium pertechnetate as a screening test for portosystemic shunts in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;196:925-930.
11. Suter PF. Portal vein anomalies in the dog: their angiographic diagnosis. J Am Radiol Soc 1975;16:84-97.
12. Wrigley RH, Park RD, Konde LJ, Lebel JL. Subtraction portal venography. Vet Radiol 1987;28:208-212.
13. Holt DE, Schelling CG, Saunders HM, Orsher RJ. Correlation of Ultrasonographic findings with surgical, portographic, and necropsy findings in dogs and cats with portosystemic shunts: 63 cases (1987-1993). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;207:1190-1193.
14. Lamb CR. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of congenital portosystemic shunts in dogs: results of a prospective study. Vet Radiol 1996;37:281-288.
15. Silverman JM, Podesta L, Villamil F et al. Portal vein patency in candidates for liver transplantation: MR angiographic analysis. Radiology 1995;197:147-152.
16. Kraus BB, Ros PR, Abbitt PL, Kerns SR, Sabatelli FW. Comparison of ultrasound, CT, and MR imaging in the evaluation of candidates for TIPS. J MRI 1995;5:571-578.
17. Hughes LA, Hartnell GG, Finn JP et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography of the portal venous system: value compared with other imaging procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:375-378.
18. Finn JP, Kane RA, Edelman RR et al. Imaging of the portal venous system in patients with cirrhosis: MR angiography vs Duplex Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:988-994.
19. Nghiem HV, Winter TC, Mountford MC et al. Evaluation of the portal venous system before liver transplantation: value of phase-contrast MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:871-878.
20. Finn JP, Esterbrook Longmaid H. Abdominal magnetic resonance venography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1992;15:51-59.
21. Gofton N. Surgical ligation of congenital portosystemic venous shunts in the dog: a report of three cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1978; 14:728-733.
22. Strombeck DR, Breznock EM, McNell S. Surgical treatment for portosystemic shunts in two dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1977;170:1317-1319.
23. Breznock EM, Berger B, Pendray D et al. Surgical manipulation of intrahepatic portocaval shunts in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983;182: 798-805.
24. Martin RA, August JR, Barber DL, Luther F. Left hepatic vein attenuation for treatment of patent ductus venosus in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986;189:1465-1468.
25. Rawlings CA, Wilson SA. Intracaval repair of a persistent ductus venosus in a dog. Vet Surg 1983;12:155-158.
26. Wrigley RH, Macy DW, Wykes PM. Ligation of ductus venosus in a dog, using ultrasonographic guidance. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983;183: 1461-1464.
27. Schmidt S, Suter PF. Angiography of the hepatic and portal venous system in the dog and cat: an investigative method. Vet Radiol 1980;21: 57-77.
28. Birchard SJ, Biller DS, Johnson SE. Differentiation of intrahepatic versus extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs using positive-contrast portography. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1989;25:13-17.
29. Tortorici MR. Fundamentals of angiography. St-Louis: C.V. Mosby Co., 1982.
30. Gomez JA, Lawson TL, Korobkin H, Moss AA. Selective abdominal angiography in the dog. J Am Vet Radiol Soc 1973;14:72-80.
31. Feeney DA, Osborne CA, Jessen CR. Effect of multiple excretory urograms on glomerular filtration of normal dogs; a preliminary report. Am J Vet Res 1980;6:960-963.
32. Nakamura H, Kurata M, Haruta K, Takeda K. Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on cardiohemodynamics and quality of radiographic image during canine angiography. J Vet Med Sci 1994;56:91-96.
33. Muller MF, Edelman RR. Magnetic resonance angiography of the abdomen. Gastroent Clin North Am 1995;24:435-456.
34. Pharaboz C, Falise B, Boyer B, Dubayle P. Principes de l'angiographie par resonance magnetique. Ann Radiol 1995;38:7-19.
35. Anderson CM, Edelman RR, Turski PA. Clinical magnetic resonance angiography. New York: Raven Press, 1993.
36. Detweiler DK. The cardiovascular system and blood flow. In: Swenson MJ. Duke's physiology of domestic animals, 10th ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.
37. Laub GA. Time-of-flight method of angiography, MRI Clin North Am 1995;3:391-398.
38. Parker DL, Du YP, Davis WL. The voxel sensitivity function in Fourier transform imaging: applications to magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:156-162.
39. Nghiem HV, Winter TC, Schmiedl UP, Freeny PC, MR angiography of the portal venous system. Sem Ultrasound, CT, MRI 1996;17:360-373.