Assessing the Quality of Clinical Procedures and Technical Standards of Dental Laboratories in Fixed Partial Denture Therapy

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 236-241

  Albashaireh, Zakereyya S M ^a,b   Alnegrish, Abdulrhman S ^a  

^a JORDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Jordan)

^b Riyadh Dental Center   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; DENTURE; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JORDAN; LABORATORY; MANPOWER; STANDARD;

DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; HUMANS; JORDAN; LABORATORIES, DENTAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC;

EID: 0033122430     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Northeast SE, van Noort R, Johnson A, Winstanley RB, White GE. Metal ceramic fixed partial dentures from commercial dental laboratories: Alloy composition cost and quality of fit. Br Dent J 1992;172:198-204.
2. Assif D, Antopolski B, Helft M, Kaffe I. Comparison of methods of clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of complete cast gold crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:20-24.
3. Kantorowicz GF, Howe LC, Shortall AC, Shovelton DS. Impression materials and techniques. In: Kantorowicz GF (ed). Inlays, Crowns & Bridges. A Clinical Handbook. Oxford: Wright, 1993:45-56.
4. Marquis PM, Williams J, Piddock V, Wilson HJ. An initial evaluation of faults in commercially manufactured crowns. Quintessence Dent Technol 1986;10:173-178.
5. Carrotte PV, Winstanley RB, Green JR. A study of the quality of impressions for anterior crowns received at a commercial laboratory. Br Dent J 1993;174:235-240.
6. Murphy WM, Bates JF, Stafford GD. Complete denture construction in dental schools and hospitals of the United Kingdom and Ireland. Br Dent J 1972;133:179-184.
7. Murphy WM, Hugget R. Survey of prosthetic technology in commercial dental laboratories. Dent Tech 1972;25:163,164, 175,176,186,187.
8. Harrison A, Hugget R, Hunt HH. Prosthesis technology in commercial dental laboratories in the United States. J Dent 1977;5: 133-140.
9. Williams GJ, Edmunds DH. Crown and bridge technology in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J 1981;150:215-217.
10. Eccles JD, Powell M. The changing pattern of dental practice in South Wales, 1965-74. J Dent 1977;5:99-106.
11. Winstanley RB, Carrotte PV, Johnson A. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges received at commercial dental laboratories. Br Dent J 1997;183:209-213.
12. Whitehead C, Williams C, Eccles JD. Women dentists in Wales. J Dent 1977;5:107-112.
13. Tjan AHL, Whang SB, Miller GD. Why a rigid tray is important to the putty wash silicone impression method. J Can Dent Assoc 1981;9:53-58.
14. Rehberg HJ. The impression tray - An important factor in impression precision. Int Dent J 1977;27:146-153.
15. Rueda LJ, Sy-Muñoz JT, Naylor JT, Naylor WP, Goodacre CJ, Swartz ML. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:367-373.
16. Bomberg TJ, Goldfogel MH, Hoffman W, Bomberg SE. Consideration for adhesion of impression materials to impression trays. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:681-684.