On the mechanism for scale invariance in orientation-defined textures

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1477-1489

  Kingdom, Frederick A A ^a   Keeble, David R T ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Orientation; Scale invariance; Texture gradients

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROTATION;

EID: 0033121162     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00217-X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bach M., Meigen T. Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation-effect of orientation gradient. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. A1349(Suppl. 33):1992;962.
2. Bergen, J. R. (1991). Theories of visual texture perception. In D. Regan, Vision and visual dysfunction. New York: Macmillan. Vol 10B.
3. Chubb, C., & Landy, M. S. (1991). Orthogonal distribution analysis: a new approach to the study of texture perception. In M. S. Landy, & J. A. Movshon, Computational models of visual processing (pp. 291-301). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Dakin S. C. The detection of structure in glass patterns: psychophysics & computational models. Vision Research. 37:1996;2227-2246.
5. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception. 1979;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
6. Gurnsey R., Laundry D.S. Texture discrimination with and without abrupt texture gradients. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 46:1992;306-332.
7. Howell C. R., Hess R. F. The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research. 18:1978;369-374.
8. Jamar J. H. T., Koenderink J. J. Sine-wave gratings: scale invariance and spatial integration at suprathreshold contrast. Vision Research. 23:1983;805-810.
9. Keeble D. R. T, Kingdom F. A. A, Moulden B., Morgan M. J The detection of orientationally multimodal textures. Vision Research. 35:1995;1991-2005.
10. Keeble D. R. T., Kingdom F. A. A., Morgan M. J. The orientational resolution of texture perception. Vision Research. 37:1997;2993-3007.
11. Kingdom F. A. A., Keeble D. R. T., Moulden B. Sensitivity to orientation modulation in micropattern-based textures. Vision Research. 35:1995;79-91.
12. Kingdom F. A. A., Keeble D. R. T. A linear systems approach to the detection of both abrupt and smooth spatial variations in orientation-defined textures. Vision Research. 36:1996;409-420.
13. Landy M. S., Bergen J. R. Texture segregation and orientation gradient. Vision Research. 31:1991;679-691.
14. Nothdurft H. C. Sensitivity for structure gradient in texture discrimination tasks. Vision Research. 25:1985;1957-1968.
15. Nothdurft H. C. Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast. Vision Research. 31:1991;1073-1078.
16. Parker A. Solid shape and the natural world. Current Biology. 3:1993;401-403.
17. Sutter A., Sperling G., Chubb C. Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms. Vision Research. 35:1995;915-924.
18. Van Meeteran A., Barlow H.B. The statistical efficiency for detecting sinusoidal modulation of average dot density in random figures. Vision Research. 21:1981;765-777.
19. Wolfson S. S., Landy M. S. Discrimination of orientation-defined texture edges. Vision Research. 35:1995;2863-2877.
20. Wolfson S. S., Landy M. S. Examining edge- and region-based texture analysis mechanisms. Vision Research. 38:1998;439-446.