New features and enhancements in the X-PLOR computer program

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 25-33

  Badger, John ^a,d   Kumar, R Ajay ^a,b   Yip, Ping ^a,c   Szalma, Sándor ^a  

^a ACCELRYS INC   (United States)

^b IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c SEQUENOM INC   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Crystallographic refinement; NMR structure determination

Indexed keywords

COLICIN; INSULIN; TRYPSIN;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0033120221     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990401)35:1<25::AID-PROT3>3.0.CO;2-V     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brünger AT, Kuriyan J, Karplus M. Crystallographic R factor refinement by molecular dynamics. Science 1987;235:458-460.
2. Brooks B, Bruccoleri R, Olafson B, States D, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and molecular dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 1983;4:187-217.
3. Brünger AT. X-PLOR, Version 3.1: A system for x-ray crystallography and NMR. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.
4. Rice LM, Brünger AT. Torsion angle dynamics: reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement. Proteins 1994;19:277-290.
5. Stein EG, Rice LM, Brünger AT. Torsion-angle molecular dynamics as a new efficient tool for NMR structure calculation. J Magn Reson 1997;124:154-164.
6. Burling FT, Weis WI, Flaherty KM, Brünger AT. Direct observation of protein solvation and discrete disorder with experimental phases. Science 1995;271:72-77.
7. Jiang J-A, Brünger AT. Protein hydration observed by x-ray diffraction:solvation properties of penicillopepsin and neuraminidase crystal structures. J Mol Biol 1994;243:100-115.
8. Garret DS, Kuszewski J, Hancock TJ, Lodi PJ, Vuister GW, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. The impact of direct refinement against three-bond HN-CaH coupling constants on protein structure determination by NMR. J Magn Reson 1994;B104:99-103.
9. Kuszewski J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. The impact of direct refinement against proton chemical shifts in protein structure determination by NMR. J Magn Reson 1995;B107:293-297.
10. Kuszewski J, Qin J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. The impact of direct refinement against 13Cα and 13Cβ chemical shifts on protein structure determination by NMR. J Magn Reson 1995; B106:92-96.
11. Pannu NS, Read RJ. Improved structure refinement through maximum likelihood. Acta Crystallogr 1996;A52:659-668.
12. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr 1997;D53:240-255.
13. Bricogne G, Irwin JJ. maximum-likelihood refinement of incomplete models with BUSTER+TNT. In: Bailey S, Dodson EJ, editors. Macromolecular refinement, Proceedings of the CCP4 Study Weekend at Chester College, January 5-6. 1996:85-92.
14. Adams PD, Pannu NS , Read RJ, Brünger AT. Cross-validated maximum likelihood enhances crystallographic simulated annealing refinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:5018-5023.
15. Pannu NS, Murshudov GN, Dodson EJ, Read R. Incorporation of prior phase probability information strengthens maximum likelihood structural refinement. Acta Crystallogr 1997;D54:1285-1294.
16. Badger J, Harris MR, Reynolds CD, Evans AC, Dodson EJ, Dodson GG, North ACT. Structure of the pig insulin dimer in the cubic crystal. Acta Crystallogr 1991;B47:127-136.
17. Engh RA, Huber R. Accurate bond and angle parameters for x-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr 1991;A47:392-400.
18. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren NF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684-3690.
19. Andersen HC. Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J Chem Phys 1980;72:2384-2393.
20. Marquart M, Walter J, Deisenhofer J, Bode W, Huber R. The geometry of the reactive site and of the peptide groups in trypsin, trypsinogen and its complexes with inhibitors. Acta Crystallogr 1983;B39:480-.
21. Elkins P, Bunker A, Cramer WA, Stauffacher CV. A mechanism for toxin insertion into membranes is suggested by the crystal structure of the channel-forming domain of colicin E1. Structure 1997;5:443-458.
22. Hendrickson WA, Lattman EE. Representation of phase probability distributions for simplified combination of independent phase information. Acta Crystallogr 1970;B26:136-143.
23. Guntert P, Mumenthaler C, Wuthrich K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J Mol Biol 1997;273:283-298.
24. Markus MA, Matsudaira P, Wagner G. Refined structure of villin 14T and a detailed comparison with other actin-severing domains. Protein Sci 1997;6:1197-1209.
25. Bagby S, Kim S, Maldonado E, Tong KI, Reinberg D, Ikura A. Solution structure of the C-terminal domain of human tfIIβ: similarity to cyclin A an interaction with a tata-binding protein. Cell 1995;82:857-867.
26. DeCipher User Guide, San Diego: Molecular Simulations Inc, 1997.
27. Yip PF. A computationally efficient method for evaluating the gradient of 2D NOESY intensities. J Biomol NMR 1993;3:361-365.
28. Holak TA, Gondol D, Otlewski J, Wilusz T. Determination of the complete three-dimensional structure of the trypsin inhibitor from squash seeds in aqueous solution by nuclear magnetic resonance and a combination of distance geometry and dynamical simulated annealing. J Mol Biol 1989;210:635-648.
29. Nilges M, Habazettl J, Brünger AT, Holak TA. Relaxation matrix refinement of the solution structure of squash trypsin inhibitor. J Mol Biol 1991;219:499-510.
30. Badger J. Modeling and refinement of water molecules and disordered solvent. Methods Enzymol 1997;277B:344-352.
31. Tronrud DE. TNT refinement package. Methods Enzymol 1997; 277B:306-318.
32. Sheldrick GM, Schneider TR. SHELXL: high resolution refinement. Methods Enzymol 1997;277B:319-343.
33. Powell MJD. Restart procedures for the conjugate gradient method. Math Program 1977;12:241-254.
34. Tronrud DE. Conjugate-direction minimization: an improved method for the refinement of macromolecule. Acta Crystallogr 1992;A48:912-916.
35. NMRchitect User Guide. San Diego, CA: Molecular Simulations Inc., 1997.