On the adequacy of legal documents: Factors that influence informed consent

Ergonomics

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 593-613

  Wogalter, Michael S ^a   Howe, Julie E ^a   Sifuentes, Alla H ^a   Luginbuhl, James ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comprehension; Contracts; Informed consent; Knowledge acquisition; Legal

Indexed keywords

LAWS AND LEGISLATION; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

INFORMED CONSENT;

ERGONOMICS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; READING; STRESS; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0033120174     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/001401399185504     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. BLACK, B. 1981, A model plain language law, Stanford Law Review, 33, 255-300.
2. BOWDEN, E. M. 1985, Accessing relevant information during problem solving: time constraints on search in the problem space. Memory and Cognition, 13, 280-286.
3. COHEN, H. H. and BAIRD, B. P. 1988, Human factors analysis applied to a consumer fraud case: elements of a decision support system, Forensic Reports, 1, 35-41.
4. COLEMAN, M. and LIAU, T. L. 1975, A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 283-284.
5. DOOB, A. N. and KIRSCHENBAUM, H. M. 1973, Bias in police lineups: partial remembering, Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1, 287-293.
6. DUFFY, T. M. and KABANCE, P. 1982, Testing a readable writing approach to text revision, Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 733-748.
7. FLESCH, R. F. 1948, A new readability yardstick, Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 384-390.
8. GEST, T. 1995, Combating legalese, U.S. News and World Report, 20 March, 78-82.
9. GODEREY, S. S., ALLENDER, L., LAUGHERY, K. R. and SMITH, V. 1983, Warning messages: will the consumer bother to look?, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society), 950-954.
10. GRAY, B. H., COOKE, R. A. and TANNENBAUM, A. S. 1978, Research involving human subjects, Science, 201, 1094-1101.
11. GRAY, W. B. 1975, How to Measure Readability (Philadelphia, PA: Dorrance and Co.).
12. HOWE, J. E. and WOGALTER, M. S. 1994, The understandability of legal documents: are they adequate? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society), 439-442.
13. HOWE, J. E. and WOGALTER, M. S. 1995, On making legal documents understandable: objective and subjective measures, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society), 430-434.
14. IN RE STENARDO 1993, 991 F.2d 1089.
15. LAUGHERY, K. R., WOGALTER, M. S. and YOUNG, S. L. (eds) 1994, Human Factors Perspectives on Warnings (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
16. LOCK, E. A. and LATHAM, G. P. 1990, A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
17. LONG, D. 1987, Sensible Grammar (Troy, MI: Sensible Software).
18. MAGURNO, A. B. and WOGALTER, M. S. 1994, Behavioral compliance with warnings: effects of stress and placement, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society), 826-830.
19. MANN, T. 1994, Informed consent for psychological research: do subjects comprehend consent forms and understand their legal rights? Psychological Science, 5, 140-143.
20. MASSON, M. E. J. and WALDRON, M. A. 1994, Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts: effectiveness of plain language redrafting, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 67-85.
21. MCDONALD, M. 1992, Lawyers vs. language: briefs are criminal, News and Observer, Raleigh, NC, 24 May.
22. MILGRAM, S. 1963, Behavioral study of obedience, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
23. MORROW, G. R. 1980, How readable are subject consent forms? Journal of the American Medical Association, 244, 56-58.
24. MORROW, G. R., GOOTNICK, J. and SCHMALE, A. 1978, A simple technique for increasing cancer patients' informed consent to treatment, Cancer, 42, 793-799.
25. ODUM, M. 1992, Herein, aforesaid doublespeak, The Times Union, Albany, NY, 5 June.
26. PAIVIO, A. 1975, Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye, Memory and Cognition, 3, 635-647.
27. PENNEY, C. G. 1975, Modality effects in short-term verbal memory, Psychological Bulletin, 82, 68-84.
28. PENNEY, C. G. 1989, Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory, Memory and Cognition, 17, 398-422.
29. SCOTT, C. and SUCHAN, J. 1987, Public sector collective bargaining agreements: how readable are they?, Public Personnel Management, 16, 15-22.
30. WOGALTER, M. S. and YOUNG, S. L. 1991, Behavioural compliance to voice and print warnings, Ergonomics, 34, 79-89.
31. WOGALTER, M. S., KALSHER, M. J. and RACICOT, B. M. 1993, Behavioral compliance with warnings: effects of voice, context, and location. Safety Science, 16, 637-654.
32. WOGALTER, M. S., MAGURNO, A. B., RASHID, R. and KLEIN, K. W. 1998, The influence of time stress and location on behavioral warning compliance, Safety Science, in press.
33. WOGALTER, M. S., SIFUENTES, A. H. and LUGINBUHL, J. 1997, Factors influencing comprehension of informed consent: appearance, time stress and voice, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society), 529-532.
34. WRIGHT, P. and HULL, A. J. 1990, How people give verbal instructions, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 153-174.
35. WRIGHT, P., CREIGHTON, P. and THRELFALL, S. M. 1982, Some factors determining when instructions will be read, Ergonomics, 25, 225-237.
36. YOUNG, D. R., HOOKER, D. T. and FREEBERG, F. E. 1990, Informed consent documents: increasing comprehension by reducing reading levels, IRB, 12, 1-5.