The cost of crop damage caused by ozone air pollution from motor vehicles

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 273-289

  Murphy, J J ^a,d   Delucchi, M A ^b   McCubbin, D R ^b   Kim, H J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural production; Air pollution; Economics; Environmental policy; Motor vehicle emissions

Indexed keywords

OZONE;

AGRICULTURAL PERFORMANCE; CROP DAMAGE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; TRAFFIC EMISSION;

AIR POLLUTION; CROP; EXHAUST GAS; MOTOR VEHICLE; NONHUMAN; PLANT GROWTH; POLICY; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033117703     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jema.1999.0256     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams, R. M. and Crocker, T. D. (1989). The agricultural economics of environmental change: Some lessons from air pollution. Journal of Environmental Management 28, 295-307.
2. Adams, R. M. and McCarl, B. A. (1985). Assessing the benefits of alternative ozone standards on agriculture: The role of response information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 12, 264-276.
3. Adams, R. M., Crocker, T. D. and Thanavibulchai, N. (1982). An economic assessment of air pollution damages to selected annual crops in southern California. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 9, 42-58.
4. Adams, R. M., Hamilton, S. A. and McCarl, B. A. (1984). The Economic Effects of Ozone on Agriculture. EPA-600/3-84-090. Corvallis, OR: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Research Laboratory.
5. Adams, R. M., Glyer, J. D., Johnson, S. L. and McCarl, B. A. (1989). A reassessment of the economic effects of ozone on US agriculture. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 39, 960-968.
6. Adams, R. M., Hamilton, S. A. and McCarl, B. A. (1986). The benefits of pollution control: The case of ozone and US agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, 886-889.
7. Ashmore, M. R. (1991). Air pollution and agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture 20, 139-144.
8. Brown, D. and Smith, M. (1984). Crop substitution in the estimation of economic benefits due to ozone reduction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11, 347-362.
9. Bureau of the Census (1989). 1987 Census of Agriculture, Geographic Area Series. AC-87-A-<1 to 50>, 50 parts. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
10. California Air Resources Board (1987). Effects of Ozone on Vegetation and Possible Alternative Ambient Air Quality Standards, Staff Report. Sacramento: California Air Resources Board.
11. Davis, S. C. (1997). Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 17. ORNL-6919. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
12. Delucchi, M. A. (1996). The Allocation of the Social Costs of Motor-vehicle Use to Six Classes of Motor Vehicles. UCD-ITS-RR-96-3 (10). Davis, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Davis.
13. Delucchi, M. A. and McCubbin, D. R. (1996). The Contribution of Motor Vehicles and other Sources to Ambient Air Pollution. UCD-ITS-RR-96-3 (16). Davis, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Davis.
14. Delucchi, M. A., Murphy, J., Kim, J. and McCubbin, D. R. (1996). The Cost of Crop Damage Caused by Ozone Air Pollution from Motor-Vehicles. UCD-ITS-RR-96-3 (12). Davis, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Davis.
15. Derwent, R. G., Jenkin, M. E. and Saunders, S. M. (1996). Photochemical ozone creation potentials for a large number of reactive hydrocarbons under European conditions. Atmospheric Environment 30, 181-199.
16. Energy and Resource Consultants, Inc. (1985). Economic Assessment of the Effects of Air Pollution on Agricultural Crops in the San Joaquin Valley. California Air Resources Board Contract A2-054-32. Boulder, CO: Energy and Resource Consultants, Inc.
17. Heagle, A. S., Heck, W. W., Lesser, V. M., Rawlings, J. O. and Mowry, F. L. (1986). Injury and yield response of cotton to chronic doses of ozone and sulfur dioxide. Journal of Environmental Quality 15, 375-382.
18. Heck, W. W. and Brandt, C. S. (1977). Effects of air pollution on vegetation. In Air Pollution, Volume 2, (A. C. Stern, ed.) New York: Academic Press.
19. Heck, W. W., Taylor, O. C., Adams, R., Bingham, G., Miller, J., Preston, E. and Weinstein, L. (1982). Assessment of crop loss from ozone. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 32, 353-361.
20. Heck, W. W., Cure, W. W., Rawlings, J. O., Zaragoza, L. J., Heagle, A. S., Heggestad, H. E., Kohut, R. J., Kress, L. W. and Temple, P. J. (1984). Assessing impacts of ozone on agricultural crops: II. Crop yield functions and alternative exposure statistics. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 34, 810-817.
21. Heck, W. W., Taylor, O. C. and Tingey, D. T. (1988). Assessment of Crop Loss from Air Pollutants. New York: Elsevier Applied Science.
22. Herrick, C. N. and Kulp, J. L. (1987). Interim Assessment: The Causes and Effects of Acidic Deposition. Volume 1, Executive Summary. Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Office for the Director of Research.
23. Howitt, R. E. (1991). Calibrated Models for Agricultural Production and Environmental Analysis. Working Paper 91-10. Davis, CA: University of California at Davis, Department of Agricultural Economics.
24. Howitt, R. E. and Goodman, C. (1989). The Economic Assessment of California Field Crop Losses Due to Air Pollution, Final Report. Contract #A5-105-32. Sacramento: California Air Resources Board.
25. Howitt, R. E., Gossard, T. W. and Adams, R. M. (1984). Effects of alternative ozone concentrations and response data on economic assessments: The case of California crops. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 34, 1122-1127.
26. Kopp, R. J., Vaughan, W. J., Hazilla, M. and Carson, R. (1985). Implications of environmental policy for US agriculture: The case of ambient ozone standards. Journal of Environmental Management 20, 321-331.
27. Krupnick, A. J. and Kopp, R. J. (1988). The Health and Agricultural Benefits of Reductions in Ambient Ozone in the United States. Discussion Paper QE88-10. Resources for the Future, Quality of the Environmental Division.
28. Lefohn, A. S. and Altshuller, A. P. (1996). Environmental concentrations, patterns, and exposure estimates. In Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants. Vol. II. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
29. Lesser, V. M., Rawlings, J. O., Spruill, S. E. and Somerville, M. C. (1990). Ozone effects on agricultural crops: Statistical methodologies and estimated dose-response relationships. Crop Science 30, 148-155.
30. McCool, P. M., Musselman, R. C., Tesa, R. R. and Oshima, R. J. (1986). Determining crop yield losses from air pollutants. California Agriculture 40, 9-10.
31. McCubbin, D. R. and Delucchi, M. A. (1996). The Social Cost of the Health Effects of Motor-Vehicle Air Pollution. UCD-ITS-RR-96-3 (11). Davis, CA: University of California at Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies.
32. Mjelde, J. W., Adams, R. M., Dixon, B. L. and Garcia, P. (1984). Using farmers' actions to measure crop loss due to air pollution. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 34, 360-364.
33. Murphy, J. J. and Delucchi, M. A. (1998). Review of the literature on the social cost of motor vehicle use in the United States. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 1, 15-42.
34. Mutters, R. G., Madore, M. and Bytnerowicz, A. (1993). Formaldehyde exposure affects growth and metabolism of common bean. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 43, 113-116.
35. National Agricultural Statistics Service (1995a). Crop Values, Final Estimates for 1987-1992. Statistical Bulletin No. 903. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
36. National Agricultural Statistics Service (1995b). Vegetable Crops, Final Estimates by States, 1987-1992. Statistical Bulletin No. 902. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
37. National Agricultural Statistics Service (1995c). Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts, Final Estimates for 1987-1992. Statistical Bulletin No. 900. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
38. National Agricultural Statistics Service (1995d). Citrus Fruits: Revised Estimates for 1986-87 to 1992-93. Statistical Bulletin No. 899. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
39. Olszyk, D. M., Cabrera, H. and Thompson, C. R. (1988a). California statewide assessment of the effects of ozone on crop productivity. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 38, 928-931.
40. Olszyk, D. M., Thompson, C. R. and Poe, M. P. (1988b). Crop loss assessment for California: Modeling losses with different ozone standard scenarios. Environmental Pollution 53, 303-311.
41. Rowe, R. D. and Chestnut, L. G. (1985). Economic assessment of the effects of air pollution on agricultural crops in the San Joaquin Valley. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 35, 728-734.
42. Spash, C. L. (1997). Assessing the economic benefits to agriculture from air pollution control. Journal of Economic Surveys 11, 47-70.
43. US Department of Agriculture (USDA), (1992). Agricultural Statistics, 1992. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
44. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1992). Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
45. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (USEPA). (1996). Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information. Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
46. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (USEPA). (1998). National Air Quality and Emission Trends Report, 1996. EPA 454/R-97-013. Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environmental Protection Agency.