And the last shall be first: Recordkeeping policies and the nil

Journal of the American Society for Information Science

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 331-339

  Hedstrom, Margaret ^a   Wallace, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; DATA STRUCTURES; INFORMATION SERVICES; PUBLIC POLICY; SECURITY OF DATA; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

INFORMATION RECORDKEEPING POLICY;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0033116907     PISSN: 00028231     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:4<331::AID-ASI10>3.0.CO;2-W     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Information Systems (ACCIS). (1990). Management of electronic records: Issues and guidelines. New York: United Nations.
2. American Society for Information Science. (1997). Bulletin, 23:5.
3. Archives Authority of New South Wales. (1997). Policy on electronic recordkeeping.
4. Australian Archives. (1997). Managing electronic records-A shared responsibility.
5. Bearak, B. (1997, July 25). Swiss bankers' list throws light on pain and mystery of war time. New York Times, p. A6.
6. Bearman, D. (1989). Archival methods. Pittsburgh, PA: Archives and Museum Informatics.
7. Bearman, D., & Hedstrom, M. (1993). Reinventing archives for electronic records: Alternative service delivery options (pp. 82-98). In Hedstrom, M. (Ed.), Electronic records management program strategies. Pittsburgh, PA: Archives and Museum Informatics.
8. Braman, S. (1990). The unique characteristics of information policy and their U.S. consequences. In Blake, V. L. P., & Tjoumas, R. (Eds.). Information literacies for the twenty-first century (pp. 47-77). Boston.
9. Burger, R. H. (1993). Information policy: A framework for evaluation and policy research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.