Using metamodeling to integrate object-oriented analysis, design and programming concepts

Information Systems

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 113-129

  Van Hillegersberg, Jos ^a   Kumar, Kuldeep ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DATA STRUCTURES; DATABASE SYSTEMS; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

METAMODELING; OBJECT ORIENTATION; OBJECT ORIENTED ANALYSIS; OBJECT ORIENTED DESIGN;

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EID: 0033116820     PISSN: 03064379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4379(99)00008-3     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. [1] ACOMP. Agreement on core object methodology principles (ACOMP). L'OBJET, 1(3):1-4, http://www.eiffel.com/lobjet/1.3/animo.html (1996).
2. [2] ANSI. Data Semantic Content - Metamodel for the Management of Shareable Data. Draft proposed American National Standard, M. P. Hawes, editor, X3L8/95-012 Rev. 3, pp. 1-87, ANSI, Inc. http://www.lbl.gov/%7Eolken/X3L8/ (1995).
3. [3] A. Artale, E. Franconi, N. Guarino, and L. Pazzi. Part-whole relations in object-centered systems: an overview. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 16(12), http://www.ladseb.pd.cnr.it/infor/Ontology/DKE_TOC.html (1995).
4. [4] P. Atzeni and R. Torlone. A metamodel approach for the management of multiple models and translation of schemes, Information Systems, 18(6):349-362 (1993).
5. [5] C. Batini, S. Ceri, and B. Navathe. Conceptual Database design: An Entity-Relationship Approach, Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Comp., Redwood city, California (1992).
6. [6] C. Batini and G. Santucci. Top-down design in the entity-relationship model. In The Entity-Relationship Approach to Systems Analysis and Design, P.P. Chen, editor, North-Holland (1980).
7. [7] F. Bonfatti and L. Pazzi. Ontological foundations for state and identity within the object-oriented paradigm. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5/6):891-906 (1995).
8. [8] G. Booch. Object-oriented analysis and design with applications. Benjamin/Cummings, Redwood city, California (1993).
9. [9] G. Booch and J. Rumbaugh. Unified Modeling Language: UML Semantics Version 1.0. Rational Software Corporation. http://www.rational.com (1997).
10. [10] S. Brinkkemper. Formalisation of Information Systems Modelling. pp. 1-209, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, The Netherlands. PhD-Thesis. Thesis Publishers (1990).
11. [11] CDIF. Draft for the CDIF/OOAD Meta-model. editor, J. Ernst. CDIF-JE-N24-V1, pp. 1-24, http://www.cdif.org/ (1995).
12. [12] S. A. Demurjian and D. D. Hsiao. Towards a better understanding of data models through multilingual data systems. IEEE Transactions on SE, 14:(7):946-958 (1988).
13. [13] A. Goldberg and D. Robson. Smalltalk-80 - The language and its implementation. Reading, Addison-Wesley, MA (1983).
14. [14] H. Gomaa. Software design methods for the design of large-scale real-time systems. Journal of Systems & Software, 25(2):127-146 (1994).
15. [15] F. Harmsen, S. Brinkkemper, and H. Oei. Situational Method Engineering for Information System Project Approaches. In: Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, editors A.A. Verrijn-Stuart and T.W. Olle, IFIP, pp. 169-194, Elsevier Sciences, North Holland (1994).
16. [16] B. Henderson-Sellers. COMMA: An architecture for method interoperability. Report on Object Analysis and Design, 1(3):25-28 (1994).
17. [17] B. Henderson-Sellers and A. Bulthuis. The COMMA Project: Final Report (First draft for limited circulation to methodologists and collaborators) nr. 95/36, pp. 1-45, Swinburne University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. http://www.csse.swin.edu.au/cotar (1996).
18. [18] B. Henderson-Sellers and D. G. Firesmith. COMMA: proposed core model. Report on Object Analysis and Design, 4(1):48-53 (1997).
19. [19] S. Hong, G. v. Goor, and S. Brinkkemper. A formal approach to the comparison of object-oriented analysis and design methodologies. In Proceedings of HICSS-26, pp. 689-698 (1993).
20. [20] M.A. Jackson. Systeem Ontwikkeling volgens JSD (Jackson System Development). Academic Service, Schoonhoven, (English publisher: Prentice-Hall) (1983).
21. [21] J.C. Kelly and Y.S. Sherif. Comparison of four design methods for real-time software development. Information & Software Technology, 34(2):74-82 (1992).
22. [22] K. Kumar and R.J. Welke. Methodology engineering: a proposal for situation specific methodology construction. In Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development, editors W. W. Cotterman and J. A. Senn, pp. 257-266, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1992).
23. [23] T. W. Ling and P.K. Teo. Toward resolving inadequacies in object-oriented data models. Information & Software Technology, 35(5):267-276 (1993).
24. [24] K. Lyytinen, P. Kerola, J. Kaipala, S. Kelly, J. Lehto, H. Liu, P. Marttiin, H. Oinas-Kukkonen, J. Pirhonen, M. Rossi, K. Smolander, V.P. Tahvanainen, and J.P. Tolvanen. MetaPHOR: metamodeling, principles, hypertext, objects and repositories TR-7, Computer Science and Information Systems Reports, pp. 1-44, University of Jyväskylä. Finland. http://www.cs.jyu.fi/research.html (1994).
25. [25] P. Marttiin, K. Lyytinen, M. Rossi, V.P. Tahvanainen, K. Smolander, and J.P. Tolvanen. Modeling requirements for the future: issues and implementation considerations. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Systems, editors, J. DeGross, J. Becker, and J. Elam, pp. 9-20, ACM, Dallas (1992).
26. [26] MetaCase, MetaEdit+ 2.5 User's Guide, Metacase Consulting, http://www.jsp.fi/metacase/ (1996).
27. [27] B. Meyer. Object-oriented Software Construction. Prentice Hall, New York (1988).
28. [28] D.E. Monarchi and G.I. Puhr. A research typology for object-oriented analysis and design. Comm. ACM, 35(9):35-47 (1992).
29. [29] M. Morgestern. A unifying approach for conceptual schema to support multiple data models. In: Entity-Relationship approach to information modelling and analysis. editor P.P. Chen, pp. 279-297, North-Holland (1983).
30. [30] J. H. Saunders. A survey of object-oriented programming languages. Journal of Object Oriented Programming, 1(6):5-11 (1989).
31. [31] R.W. Sebesta. Concepts of Programming Languages. Benjamin/Cummings, Redwood City, CA (1992).
32. [32] K. Smolander, K. Lyytinen, V.P. Tahvanainen, and P. Marttiin. Meta-Edit - A flexible graphical environment for methodology modelling. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Third International Conference CAiSE'91: Proceedings, editors, R. Andersen, J. A. Bubenko jr., and A. Solvberg, 168-193, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1991).
33. [33] A. Snyder. The essence of objects: concepts and terms. IEEE Software, pp. 31-42 (1993).
34. [34] K. Srinivasan and S. Jayaraman. Comparison of object-oriented programming languages. Journal of Object Oriented Programming, 7(3):27-32 (1994).
35. [35] P. M. Steele and A. B. Zaslavsky. The role of meta models in federating system modelling techniques. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 315-326, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1995).
36. [36] B. Stroustrup. The C++ programming language. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA (1991).
37. [37] A. Taivalsaari. On the notion of object. Journal of Systems Software, 21:3-16 (1993).
38. [38] K. Takagaki and Y. Wand. An object-oriented information systems model based on ontology. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC8/WG 8.1 Working conference on the object-oriented approach in Information Systems, editors, F. Van Assche, B. Moulin, and C. Rolland, 275-296, Elsevier Science Pub., North-Holland (1991).
39. [39] D. Teichroew. P. Macasovic, E. A. Hershey, and Y. Yamamototo. Application of the entity-relationship approach to information systems modelling. In The Entity-Relationship Approach to Systems Analysis and Design, editor, P. P. Chen. North-Holland, (1980).
40. [40] J. P. Tolvanen. Mehtodology Engineering in CASE: Towards an Incremental Approach TR-5, pp. 1-120, Computer Science and Information Systems Reports. University of Jyväskylä, Finland. PHD-Thesis (1994).
41. [41] J. P. Tolvanen, P. Marttiin and K. Smolander. An integrated model for information systems modeling. In: Proceedings of the 26th HICSS, editors J. F. Nunamaker and H. M. Sprague, pp. 470-479, IEEE press (1993).
42. [42] J. van Hillegersberg. Metamodelling-based Integration of Object-Oriented Systems Development. PhD Thesis. Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam (1997).
43. [43] J. van Hillegersberg and K. Kumar. Will a dominant standard for object-oriented system development emerge? In Proceedings of HICSS-30, IEEE (1991).
44. [44] J. van Hillegersberg and K. Kumar. OMF- Object Modelling Framework Project: The WWW - Encyclopeadia of OOP metamodels. Erasmus University, http://www.fbk.eur.nl/FBK/VG1/JVH/OO/ornf.html (1997).
45. [45] J. van Hillegersberg, K. Kumar, and R. J. Welke. Using metamodeling to evaluate the match of object-oriented analysis and design to programming. In Proceedings of HICSS-31, editor H. J. Watson, pp. 323-332, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998).
46. [46] Y. Wand, D. E. Monarchi, J. Parsons, and C. C. Woo. Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development. Decision Support Systems, 15:285-304 (1995).
47. [47] P. Wegner. Concepts and paradigms of object-oriented programming. OOPS Messenger, 1(1):7-87 (1990).
48. [48] R. J. Welke. IS/DSS: A DBMS support system for information systems development. In: Database Management: Theory and Applications, editors C. W. Holsapple and A. B. Whinston, pp. 195-250, D. Reidel Pub. Company, Dordrecht (1983).
49. [49] R. J. Welke. The CASE repository: More than another Database Application. In: Challenges and strategies for research in systems development, editors W. W. Cotterman and J. A. Senn, pp. 181-214, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1992).
50. [50] J. F. H. Winkler. Objectivism: 'class' considered harmful. Comm. ACM, 35(8):128-130 (1992).
51. [51] E. Yourdon. Object-Oriented Systems Design. An Integrated Approach. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ (1994).