Model switching in intelligent control systems

Artificial Intelligence in Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 175-187

  Ravindranathan, Mohan ^a   Leitch, Roy ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Heterogeneous knowledge; Homogeneous and heterogeneous reasoning; Intelligent control; Multiple models

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; FORMAL LOGIC; INTELLIGENT CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; CONTROL THEORY; EFFICIENCY; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; SWITCHING;

HETEROGENEOUS KNOWLEDGE; HETEROGENEOUS REASONING; MULTIPLE MODELS; INTELLIGENT CONTROL SYSTEMS;

SWITCHING SYSTEMS; CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0033116617     PISSN: 09541810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0954-1810(98)00016-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Leitch RR. Modelling of complex dynamic systems. IEE Proceedings Part D 1987;134(3):245-250.
2. Leitch RR, Shen Q. Qualitativeness does not imply fuzziness, Proceedings of Third IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 2, 1994, pp. 1257-1262.
3. Hayes-Roth BA. A blackboard architecture for control. Artificial Intelligence 1985;26:251-321.
4. Chittaro L, Guida G, Tasso C, Toppano E. Functional and teleological knowledge in the multimodeling approach for reasoning about physical systems: A case study in diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1993;6:1718-1751.
5. Brajnik G, Chittaro L, Guida G, Tasso C, Toppano E. The use of many diverse models of an artefact in the design of cognitive aids. Proc. 2nd European Met. Cogn, Approaches to Process Control, Siena, Vol. 1, 1989, pp. 69-79.
6. Guida G. Reasoning about physical systems: shallow versus deep models. In: Mamdami N, Efstathiou J, editors. Expert systems and optimisation in process control, Aldershot, England: Technical Press, 1986. pp. 135.
7. Chandrasekaran B. Models vs. rules, deep vs. complied, content vs. form: Some distinctions in knowledge systems research. IEEE Expert 1991;2:75-79.
8. Ravindranathan M, Leitch RR. MuRaLi: An architecture of multiple reasoning, Ninth International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS), Zakopane, Poland, 9-13 June; Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1079, Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1996, pp. 593-602.
9. Rosenbloom P, Laird JE, Newell A, McCarl R. A preliminary analysis of the Soar architecture as a basis for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 1991;47:289-325.
10. Ravindranathan M, Leitch RR. Multiple reasoning architecture for intelligent systems. Second International Workshop on Architecture for Intelligent Systems, Germany, 5-9 September 1994.
11. Leitch RR, Gallanti M. Task classification for knowledge-based systems in industrial automation. IEEE Transaction on systems, Man and Cybernetics 1992;22:142-152.
12. Leitch RR, Freitag H, Shen Q, Struss P, Tornielli G. Artist: A methodological approach to specifying model based diagnostic systems. In: Guida G, Stefanini A, editors. Industrial Application of Knowledge Based Diagnosis, 1992.
13. Rasmussen J. The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1985;2:234-244.
14. Leitch RR, Chantier MJ, Shen Q, Coghill GM. A preliminary specification methodology for model based diagnosis. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 1993;11:100.
15. Bytronic Associates, Process Control Unit. Sutton Coldfield, UK, 1995.
16. Bloom FE, Lazerson A, Hofstadter L. Brain, mind and behaviour. New York: W.H. Freeman and company, 1985.
17. Chandrasekaran B. Toward a taxonomy of problem solving types. AI Magazine 1983;4:9-17.