Goal-based personalities and social behaviors in believable agents

Applied Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 239-271

  Rizzo, Paola ^a,c   Veloso, Manuela M ^b   Miceli, Maria ^c   Cesta, Amedeo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; MOTION PLANNING; ROBOTICS;

BELIEVABLE AGENTS; GOAL-BASED PERSONALITIES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 0033115736     PISSN: 08839514     EISSN: 10876545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/088395199117414     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bates, J. 1994. The role ofemotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM 37(7):122-125.
2. Bates, J., A. B. Loyall, and W. S. Reilly. 1992. Integrating reactivity, goals, and emotion in a broad agent. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
3. Blythe, J., and W. S. Reilly. 1993. Integrating reactive and deliberative planning for agents. Technical Report CMU-CS-93-155, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science.
4. Bonasso, R. P., D. Kortenkamp, D. P. Miller, and M. Slack. 1995. Experiences with an architecture for intelligent, reactive agents. In Proceedings ofATAL-95.
5. Carbonell, J. 1980. Towards a process model of human personality traits. Artificial Intelligence 15:49-74.
6. Castelfranchi, C., F. de Rosis, and R. Falcone. 1997. Social attitudes and personalities in agents. In Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Socially Intelligent Agents. AAAI Technical Report FS-97-02. Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.
7. Cesta, A., and M. Miceli (1993). In search of help: Strategic social knowledge and plans. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Hidden Valley, Pa.
8. Dryer, D. C. 1997. Ghosts in the machine: Personalities for socially adroit software agents. In Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Socially Intelligent Agents. AAAI Technical Report FS-97-02. Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.
9. Elliott, C. 1992. The affective reasoner: A process model of emotions in a multi-agent system, Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University. Technical Report No. 32.
10. Emmons, R. A. 1989. The personal striving approach to personality. In Goal concepts in personality and social psychology, ed. L. A. Pervin. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Firby, R. J. 1987. An investigation into reactive planning in complex domains. In Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 202-206. Seattle, Wash.
12. Firby, R. J. 1989. Adaptive execution in complex dynamic domains, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University. Technical Report YALEU/CSD/RR 672.
13. Ford, M. E. 1992. Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
14. Ford, M. E., and C. W. Nichols. 1987. A taxonomy of human goals and some possible applications. In Humans as self-constructing living systems: Putting the framework to work. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Georgeff, M., and A. L. Lansky, 1986. Procedural knowledge. Proceedings of IEEE 74(10):1383-1398.
16. Goldberg, A. 1997. Improv. A system for real-time animation of behavior-based interactive synthetic actors. In Creating personalities for synthetic actors, eds. R. Trappl and P. Petta. Berlin: Springer.
17. Grosz, B. J., and C. L. Sidner 1990. Plans for discourse. In Intentions in communication, eds. P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18. Hayes-Roth, B. 1995. An architecture for adaptive intelligent systems. Artificial Intelligence 72:329-365.
19. Hayes-Roth, B., L. Brownston, and R. vanGent. 1995. Multi-agent collaboration in directed improvisation. In First International Conference onMulti-Agent Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
20. Laurel, B. 1991. Computers as theatre. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
21. Loyall, B. 1997. Believable agents: Building interactive personalities. Ph.D. thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. Technical Report CMU-CS-97-123.
22. Lyons, D. M., and A. J. Hendriks. 1992. Reactive planning. In Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence, 2nd ed., 1171-1181. New York: John Wiley.
23. Maes, P. 1995. Artificial life meets entertainment: Lifelike autonomous agents. Communications of the ACM 38(11):108-114.
24. McDermott, D. 1990. Planning reactive behavior: A progress report. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling and Control, ed. K. Sycara. Morgan Kaufmann: San M ateo, Calif.
25. Miceli, M., and A. Cesta. 1993. Strategic social planning: Looking for willingness in multi-agent domains. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Boulder, Colo.
26. Minton, S. 1988. Learning search control knowledge: An explanation-based approach. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
27. Page, M. M. (ed.) 1983. Personality. Current theory and research. Lincoln: University ofNebraska Press.
28. Pervin, L. A. 1989. Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Reilly, W. S. 1996. Believable social and emotional agents, Ph.D. thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa. Technical Report CMU-CS-96-138.
30. Rizzo, P., M. Miceli, and A. Cesta. 1995. On helping behavior in cooperative environments. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP’95), 96-108. Le Chesnay Cedex, France: INRIA.
31. Rizzo, P., M. M. Veloso, M. Miceli, and A. Cesta. 1997. Personality-driven social behaviors in believable agents. In Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Socially Intelligent Agents. AAAI Technical Report FS-97-02. Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.
32. Rosenschein, J. S. 1985. Rational interaction among intelligent agents. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
33. Rousseau, D., and B. Hayes-Roth. 1996. Personality in synthetic agents. Technical report, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
34. Schank, R. C., and R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Sloman, A. 1987. Motives, mechanism, and emotions. Cognition and Emotion 1(3):217-233.
36. Stone, P., M. M. Veloso, and J. Blythe. 1994. The need for different domain-independent heuristics. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS-94).
37. Veloso, M. M. 1994 Planning and learning by analogical reasoning. LNAI 886. New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. Veloso, M. M., and J. Carbonell. 1993. Derivational analogy in PRODIGY: Automating case acquisition, storage, and utilization. Machine Learning 10:249-278.
39. Veloso, M. M., J. Carbonell, A. Perez, D. Borrajo, E. Fink, and J. Blythe. 1995. Integrating planning and learning: The PRODIGY architecture. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 7:81-120.
40. Veloso, M. M., and P. Rizzo. 1998. Mapping planning actions and partially ordered plans into execution knowledge. In Workshop on Integrating Planning, Scheduling and Execution in Dynamic and Uncertain Environments. Held in conjunction with the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS’98). Pittsburgh, Pa.
41. Wilkins, D. E., and K. L. Myers. 1995. A common knowledge representation for plan generation and reactive execution. Journal of Logic and Computation 5(6):731-761.
42. Winell, M. 1987. Personal goals: The key to self-direction in adulthood. In Humans as self-constructing living systems: Putting the framework to work. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.