Evaluation model using fundamentals of engineering examination

Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 47-55

  Wicker, R B ^a   Quintana, R ^a   Tarquin, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULA; EVALUATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; PERFORMANCE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS;

EVALUATION MODEL; FUNDAMENTALS OF ENGINEERING EXAMINATION; TARQUIN NUMBER;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 0033114915     PISSN: 10523928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1999)125:2(47)     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Benefield, L. D. (1996). "Assessment and quality in higher education: a model with best practice." Proc., Conf. on Assessment and Quality, American Association for Higher Education, Washington, D.C.
2. Clark, S. B. (1991). "When control groups do not exist: Program evaluation without a net." Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Tenn. 1991.
3. Dinham, S. M. (1989). "Assessment, accreditation, and licensure, and their effects upon teaching and learning." Center for Research on Undergraduate Education, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
4. Engineering Criteria 2000. (1996). American Board of Engineering and Technology, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., Baltimore.
5. Ferrier, M. B. (1994). "In search of effective quality assessment." ASSE Prism, 4(1), 23-25.
6. Mazurek, D. F. (1995). "Consideration of FE exam for program assessment." J. Prof. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 121(4), 247-249.
7. Neff, G. (1995). "Transforming engineering education from a product to a process." Proc., 4th World Conf. on Engrg. Educ., St. Paul, Minn.
8. Rodriguez, H. V. (1989). "How many engineering colleges require students to take the FE exam?" J. Engrg. Educ., 79(3), 437-438.
9. Wolverton, M. (1994). "A new alliance: Continuous quality and classroom effectiveness." ASHE-ERIC Higher Educ. Rep. No. 6, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, D.C.