DEA sensitivity analysis by changing a reference set: Regional contribution to Japanese industrial development

Omega

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 139-153

  Hibiki, Norio ^a   Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki ^b  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Environment; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EFFICIENCY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS APPROACH; CROSS SENSITIVITY; DECISION MAKING UNIT; EFFICIENCY MEASURE; ENVIRONMENT; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; JAPANESE INDUSTRY; REFERENCE SET; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033114755     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00034-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Charnes A, Cooper W.W, Rhodes E Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 2:1978;429-444.
2. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM. Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
3. Seiford L.H Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995). J Product Anal. 7:1996;99-137.
4. Tone K. Data envelopment analysis. Tokyo: Nippon Kagaku Gijutsu Renmei, 1994 (in Japanese).
5. Tone K A simple characterization of returns to scale in DEA. J Oper Res Soc Jpn. 39:1996;604-613.
6. Goto M, Tsutsui M. Comparison of productive and cost efficiencies among Japanese and US electrical utilities. OMEGA 1998 (forthcoming).
7. Charnes A, Cooper W.W, Lewin A.W, Morey R.C, Rousseau J.J Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA. Ann Oper Res. 2:1985;139-156.
8. Charnes A, Rousseau J.J, Semple J.H Sensitivity and stability of efficiency classifications in data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal. 7:1996;5-18.
9. Charnes A, Neralic L Sensitivity analysis of the additive model in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 48:1990;332-341.
10. Andersen P, Petersen N.C A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 39:1993;1261-1264.
11. Zhu J Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 90:1996;451-460.
12. Sueyoshi T, Ohonishi K, Kinase Y. A benchmark approach for baseball evaluation. Eur J Oper Res (submitted).
13. Banker R, Charnes A, Cooper W.W Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 30:1984;1078-1092.
14. Charnes A, Cooper W.W, Thrall R.M A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal. 2:1991;197-237.
15. Thompson R.G, Singleton F.F, Thrall R.M, Smith A.A Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces. 16:1986;35-49.
16. Charnes A, Cooper W.W, Wei Q.L, Huang Z.M Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. Int J Syst Sci. 20:1989;1099-1118.
17. Wong Y.H.B, Beasley J.E Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc. 41:1990;829-835.
18. Sueyoshi T. Privatization of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone: was it a good policy decision? Eur J Oper Res 1998;107:45-61.
19. Sueyoshi T Divestiture of Nippon Telegram and Telephone. Manage Sci. 42:1996;1326-1351.
20. Sueyoshi T Measuring efficiencies and returns to scale of Nippon Telegram and Telephone in production and cost analyses. Manage Sci. 43:1997;779-796.
21. Sueyoshi T, Hasebe T, Ito F, Ozawa F, Sakai J. DEA- bilateral performance comparison: an application to Japan Agricultural Co-operatives (Nokyo). Omega 1998;26(2):233-48.
22. Banker R.D, Chang H, Cooper W.W Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 89:1996;473-481.
23. Golany B, Yu G Estimating returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Oper Res. 103:1997;28-37.