The historical and political context of the civil rights of persons with disabilities: A multicultural perspective for counselors

Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 105-120

  Middleton, Renée A ^a   Rollins, Carolyn W ^b   Harley, Debra A ^c  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033114672     PISSN: 08838534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-1912.1999.tb00218.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. §12101 et seq. (West 1993).
2. Atkins, B. J. (1988). An asset-oriented approach to cross-cultural issues: Blacks in rehabilitation. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 19, 45-49.
3. Bayh, B. (1979). Employment rights of the handicapped. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 3, 57-61.
4. Bowe, F. (1980). Rehabilitating America: Toward independence for disabled and elderly people. New York: Harper & Row.
5. Clinton, W. J. (October 16, 1995). Presidential speech on race relations [On-line]. Available: Internet:http://www.whitehouse.gov/White_House/EOP/OP/html/ut.html.
6. Cross, T. (Autumn, 1994). What if there was no affirmative action in college admissions? A refinement of our earlier calculations. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 52-54.
7. DeJong, G. (1979). The movement for independent living: Origins, ideology, and implications for disability research (Occasional Paper No.2). East Lansing: University Center for International Rehabilitation. Michigan State University.
8. DeJong, G., & Batavia, A. J. (1990). The Americans with Disabilities Act and the current state of U.S. disability policy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 1(3), 65-75.
9. Dworkin, E. P., & Dworkin, A. L. (1971). The activist counselor. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 49, 748-754.
10. Ezorsky, G. (1991). Racism and justice: The case for affirmative action. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
11. Federal Regulations. EEOC: Americans with Disabilities Act Employment Regulations to implement Title I. Codified as 29 CFR Part 1630. Washington, DC: The Bureau of National Affairs (1991).
12. Forman, J. (1992). Fighting against the tide: Defending racial preferences. New Politics, 4(1) (New Series), pp. 171-175.
13. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
14. Frieden, L., Richards, L., Cole, J., & Bailey, D. (1979). ILRU sourcebook: A technical assistance manual on independent living. Houston: Institute for Rehabilitation and Research.
15. Frisby, M. (1995, March 24). Some agencies stage affirmative action retreat while White House still debates its battle plan. Wall Street Journal, p. 16.
16. Hahn, H. (1985). Disability policy and the problem of discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 293-318.
17. Hahn, H. (1987). Civil rights for disabled Americans: The foundation of a political agenda. In A. Gartner & T. Joe (Eds.), Images of the disabled, disabling images (pp. 181-203). New York: Praeger.
18. Hahn, H., & Holland, R. W. (1976). American government - Minority rights versus majority rule. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Hull, K. (1979). The rights of physically handicapped people. New York: Avon Books.
20. Hutchinson, M. A., & Stadler, H. A. (1975). Social change counseling: A radical approach. Boston. MA: Houghton Mifflin.
21. Jackson, A. (1994). Is it diversity or affirmative action? VRD Update, Oregon Department of Human Resources, 1, 1-3.
22. King, M. L. (1968). The role of the behavioral scientist in the civil rights movement. American Psychologist, 23, 466-476.
23. Leung, P. (n.d.). Putting research to work for the realization of the goals of the ADA: The perspective of minorities and other underserved populations. National Council on Disability, Disability Research Conference. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability.
24. Middleton, R. A., Flowers, C., & Zawaiza, T. (1996). Multiculturalism, affirmative action, and Section 21 of the 1992 rehabilitation act amendments: Fact or fiction? Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 40, 11-30.
25. Nosek, M. A. (1992). Independent living. In R. M. Parker & E. M. Szymanski (Eds.), Rehabilitation Counseling: Basics and beyond (pp. 103-133). Texas: Pro-Ed.
26. Osborne, J. L., Collison, B. B., House, R. M., Gray, L. A., Firth, J., & Lou, M. (1988). Developing a social advocacy model for counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision, 37, 190-202.
27. Pedersen, P. B. (1991). Multiculturalism as a generic approach to counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 6-12.
28. Pedersen, P. B. (1997, July). The positive consequences of a culture-centered perspective. Counseling Today, p. 20.
29. Podemski, R. S., & Childers, J. H. (1980). The counselor as a change agent: An organizational analysis. The School Counselor, 27, 168-174.
30. Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992 (PL 102-569).
31. Rehabilitation Services Administration (1993). Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as Amended by The Rehabilitation Act of 1992 (PL 102-569). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
32. A retreat of civil rights. (1997, May 21). USA Today, p. 13A.
33. Rubin, S. E., & Roessler, R. T. (1995). Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process, fourth edition. Pro-Ed, Austin. Texas.
34. Schmidt, P. (1996, October 25). An end to affirmative action? Californians prepare to vote. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A32-34
35. Stone, A. (1995, March 2). Affirmative action: Focus on women. USA Today, p. 3A.
36. Thomas, R. R. (1991). Beyond race and gender. New York: AMACOM.
37. Thousands march to protest affirmative action ban. (1997, August 28). [On-line]. Available: http://www.cnn.com/US/9708/28/affirm.action/index.html
38. Weinrach, S. G. & Thomas, K. R. (1998). Diversity-sensitive counseling today: A postmodern clash of values. Journal of Counseling & Development, 76, 115-122.
39. Yang, K. (1995, March 27). A hand up, but not a handout. Business Week, p. 70.