Theoretical mechanisms underlying the trial-spacing effect in Pavlovian fear conditioning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 177-193

  Barela, Peter B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b NONE   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; FEMALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; FEMALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0033113870     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.25.2.177     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baker, A. G., Singh, M., & Bindra, D. (1985). Some effects of contextual conditioning and US predictability on Pavlovian conditioning. In P.D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and learning (pp. 73-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Barnet, R. C., Grahame, N. J., & Miller, R. R. (1995). Trial spacing effects in Pavlovian conditioning: A role for local context. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 340-348.
3. Bower, G. H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1981). Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Brelsford, J., & Theios, J. (1965). Single session conditioning of the nictitating membrane in the rabbit: Effect of intertrial interval. Psychonomic Science, 2, 81-82.
5. Carillo, M. C., Thompson, T., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Disterhoft, J. F. (1997). Variation of the intertrial interval in human classical conditioning. Psychobiology, 25, 152-157.
6. Church, R. M., & Gibbon, J. (1982). Temporal generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 165-186.
7. Domjan, M. (1980). Effects of the intertrial interval on taste-aversion learning in rats. Physiology & Behavior, 25, 117-125.
8. Ewing, J. F., Larew, M. B., & Wagner, A. R. (1985). Distribution of trials effects in Pavlovian conditioning: An apparent involvement of inhibitory backward conditioning with short intertrial intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 537-547.
9. Fanselow, M. S. (1986). Associative versus topographical accounts of the immediate shock-freezing deficit in rats: Implications for the response selection rules governing species-specific defensive reactions. Learning and Motivation, 17, 16-39.
10. Fanselow, M. S., DeCola, J. P., De Oca, B. M., & Landeira-Fernandez, J. (1995). Ventral and dorsolateral regions of the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) control different stages of defensive behavior: Dorsolateral PAG lesions enhance the defensive freezing produced by massed and immediate shock. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 63-77.
11. Fanselow, M. S., DeCola, J. P., & Young, S. L. (1993). Mechanisms responsible for reduced contextual conditioning with massed unsignaled unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 121-137.
12. Fanselow, M. S., & Tighe, T. J. (1988). Contextual conditioning with massed versus distributed unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 187-199.
13. Gibbon, J., Baldock, M. D., Locurto, C., Gold, L., & Terrace, H. S. (1977). Trial and intertrial durations in autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 264-284.
14. Gibbon, J., & Balsam, P. (1981). Spreading association in time. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219-253). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Goddard, M., Holland, M., O'Brien, J., & Hansen, D. (1994). Improving conditioning with unsignaled, but not signaled, unconditioned stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 25, 288-312.
16. Goddard, M. J., & Jenkins, H. M. (1988). Blocking of a CS-US association by a US-US association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 177-186.
17. Hays, W. L. (1981). Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: CBS College Publishing.
18. Humphreys, L. G. (1940). Distributed practice in the development of the conditioned eyelid reaction. Journal of General Psychology, 22, 379-385.
19. Janssen, M., Farley, J., & Hearst, E. (1995). Temporal location of unsignaled food deliveries: Effects on conditioned withdrawal (inhibition) in pigeon signtracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 116-128.
20. Jenkins, H. M., Barnes, R. A., & Barrera, F. J. (1981). Why autoshaping depends on trial spacing. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 255-284). New York: Academic Press.
21. Kim, J. J., & Fanselow, M. S. (1992,). Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear following hippocampal lesions. Science, 256, 675-677.
22. Logan, F. A. (1977). Hybrid theory of classical conditioning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 11, pp. 203-243). New York: Academic Press.
23. Maren, S., DeCola, J. P., & Fanselow, M. S. (1994). Water deprivation enhances fear conditioning to contextual, but not discrete, conditional stimuli in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 645-649.
24. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
25. McAllister, W. R., McAllister, D. E., Weldin, G. H., & Cohen, J. M. (1974). Intertrial interval effects in classically conditioning fear to a discrete conditioned stimulus and to situational cues. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 87, 582-590.
26. Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1989). Contingency and relative associative strength. In S. B. Klein & R. R. Mowrer (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory (pp. 61-84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Miller, R. R., & Schachtman, T. R. (1985). The several roles of context at the time of retrieval. In P. D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and learning (pp. 167-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Papini, M. R., & Brewer, M. (1994). Response competition and the trial spacing effect in autoshaping with rats. Learning and Motivation, 25, 201-215.
30. Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1992). Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 274-285.
31. Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1994). Lesions of the dorsal hippocampal formation interfere with background but not foreground contextual fear conditioning. Learning & Memory, 1, 34-44.
32. Prokasy, W. F. (1965). Stimulus fluctuation, reactive inhibition, and time Between trials in classical eyelid conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 464-472.
33. Prokasy, W. F., & Ebel, H. C. (1964). GSR conditioning and sensitization as a function of intertrial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 113-119.
34. Pugh, C. R., Tremblay, D., Fleshner, M., & Rudy, J. W. (1997). A selective role for corticosterone in contextual fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 503-511.
35. Randich, A., & Ross, R. T. (1985). Contextual stimuli mediate the effects of pre- and postexposure to the unconditioned stimulus on conditioned suppression. In P. D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and learning (pp. 105-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Rescorla, R. A., & Durlach, P. J. (1987). The role of context in intertrial interval effects in autoshaping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39B, 35-40.
37. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
38. Rogers, R. F., Talk, A. C., & Matzel, L. D. (1994). Trial-spacing effects in Hermissenda suggest contributions of associative and nonassociative cellular mechanisms. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 1030-1042.
39. Rudy, J. W. (1993). Contextual conditioning and auditory cue conditioning dissociate during development. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 887-891.
40. Salafia, W. R., Mis, F. W., Terry, W. S., Bartosiak, R. S., & Daston, A. P. (1973). Conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) as a function of length and degree of variation of intertrial interval. Animal Learning & Behavior, 1, 109-115.
41. Schull, J. (1979). A conditioned opponent theory of Pavlovian conditioning and habituation. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 13,pp. 57-90). New York: Academic Press.
42. Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974). An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review, 81, 119-145.
43. Sparks, P. D., & LeDoux, J. E. (1995). Septal lesions potentiate freezing behavior to contextual but not to phasic conditioned stimuli in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 184-188.
44. Spence, K. W., & Norris, E. B. (1950). Eyelid conditioning as a function of the intertrial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 716-720.
45. Stein, L., Sidman, M., & Brady, J. V. (1958). Some effects of two temporal variables on conditioned suppression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 151-162.
46. Terrace, H. S., Gibbon, J., Farrell, L., & Baldock, M. D. (1975). Temporal factors influencing the acquisition and maintenance of an autoshaped keypeck. Animal Learning & Behavior, 3, 53-62.
47. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Wagner, A. R., & Brandon, S. E. (1989). Evolution of a structured connectionist model of Pavlovian conditioning (AESOP). In S. B. Klein & R. R. Mowrer (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory (pp. 149-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Williams, D. A., Frame, K. A., & LoLordo, V. M. (1991). Reexamination of contextual conditioning with massed versus distributed unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 202-209.
50. Williams, D. A., Frame, K. A., & LoLordo, V. M. (1992). Discrete signals for the unconditioned stimulus fail to overshadow contextual or temporal conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 41-55.
51. Williams, D. A., & LoLordo, V. M. (1995). Time cues block the CS, but the CS does not block time cues. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 97-116.
52. Yeo, A. G. (1976). The acquisition of conditioned emotional response as a function of intertrial interval. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 449-458.
53. Yin, H., Barnet, R. C., & Miller, R. R. (1994). Trial spacing and trial distribution effects in Pavlovian conditioning: Contributions of a comparator mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 123-134.