Comparison of egg hatchability and in vitro survival of goose embryos of various origins

Poultry Science

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 579-585

  Bednarczyk, Marek ^a   Rosinski, Andrzej ^b,c  

^a Poultry Research Division   (Poland)

^b Institute of Animal Husbandry   (Poland)

^c POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Culture in vitro; Embryonic mortality; Geese; Genotype; Hatchability

Indexed keywords

ANSER; ANSER SP.;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ARTICLE; EGG; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GOOSE; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SEASON;

ANIMALS; EGGS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GEESE; OVUM; SEASONS;

EID: 0033113116     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/78.4.579     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ar, A., C. V. Paganelli, R. B. Reeves, D. G. Greene, and H. Rahn, 1974. The avian egg: water vapor conductance, shell thickness and functional prearea. Condor 76:153-158.
2. Bednarczyk, M., 1981. The influence of UV radiation of duck and goose eggs on hatching. Med. Wet. 37(10):615-617.
3. Bednarczyk, M., 1986. Wpływ pory roku i technologii lȩgu na śmiertelność zarodków kaczych. Med. Wet. 42(3):145-148.
4. Bednarczyk, M., 1993. Chick embryos culture in vitro. Zesz. Nauk. Drobiarstwa VIII:5-14.
5. Bednarczyk, M. F., A. Mazanowski, and Z. Sobek, 1985. Conservation et incubation des oeufs d'oies. Comparaison entre deux races. Arch. Geflügelkd. 49(2):46-49.
6. Bednarczyk, M., M. Siwek, P. Mackowiak, and L. Nogowski, 1997. Development of chick embryos in plastic containers. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. 24(4):103-114.
7. Bogenfürst, F., 1995. The current state and future of incubation in waterfowl. Pages 241-256 in: Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl, Halle, Germany.
8. Christensen, V. L., and F. M. McCorkle, 1982. Turkey egg weight losses and embryonic mortality during incubation. Poultry Sci. 61:1209-1213.
9. Christensen, V. L., C. R. Parkhurst, and E. W. Edens, 1982. Conductance and qualities of wild and domestic turkey eggs. Poultry Sci. 61:1753-1758.
10. Deeming, D. C., 1989. Characteristics of unturned eggs: critical period, retarded embryonic growth and poor albumen utilisation. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:239-249.
11. Dugan, J. D., M. T. Lawton, B. Glaser, and H. Brem, 1991. A new technique for explantation and in vitro cultivation of chicken embryos. Anat. Rec. 229:125-128.
12. Duncan, D. B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42.
13. Dunn, B. E., T. P. Fitzharris, and B. D. Barnett, 1981. Effect of varying chamber construction and embryo preincubation age on survival and growth of chick embryo in shell-less culture. Anat. Rec. 199:33-43.
14. Flamme, I., K. Albach, S. Müller, B. Christ, and H. J. Jacob, 1991. Two-phase in vitro culture of explanted chick embryos. Anat. Rec. 229:427-433.
15. Ionov, I., P. Surai, and V. Kuchmistov, 1994. The development and vitamin E status of goose embryo depending on incubation temperature. Pages 403-404 in: Proceedings of the 9th European Poultry Conference, Glasgow, U.K.
16. Landauer, W., 1967. The hatchability of chicken eggs as influenced by environment and heredity. Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station, Monograph 1. rev. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
17. Laughlin, K. F., and H. Lundy, 1976. The influence of sample size on the choice of method and interpretation of incubation experiments. Br. Poult. Sci. 17:53-57.
18. Luykx, R., 1994. Effects of genotype, age and storage on egg characteristics and hatchability in broiler breeders. Pages 405-406 in: Proceedings of the 9th European Poultry Conference, Glasgow, U.K.
19. Meir, M., and A. Ar, 1991. Compensation for seasonal changes in eggshell conductance and hatchability of goose eggs by dynamic control of egg water loss. Br. Poult. Sci. 32: 723-732.
20. Pingel, H., 1990. Pages 691-704 and 771-780 in: Poultry Breeding and Genetics. R. D. Crawford, ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
21. Rawlett, K., and K. Simkiss, 1987. Explanted embryo culture: in vitro and in ovo techniques for domestic fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 28:91-101.
22. Rosinski, A., and M. Bednarczyk, 1996. Wylȩgowość pisklat w rodach WD-1 i WD-3 gȩsi Biaĺych Wĺoskich. Przegla̧d Hodowlany, Zeszyty Nauk. 24:221-228.
23. Rosinski, A., and M. Bednarczyk, 1997. Influence of genotype on goose egg hatchability. Arch. Geflügelkd. 61(1):33-39.
24. Rosinski, A., R. Rouvier, G. Guy, D. Rousselot-Pailley, and H. Bielińska, 1996. Possibilities of increasing reproductive performance and meat production in geese. Pages 724-735 in: Proceedings of the XX World's Poultry Congress, New Delhi, India.
25. Rouvier, R., B. Poujardieu, C. Chrysostome, and D. Rousselot-Pailley, 1990. Selection experiment of two Landaise geese strains, Anser anser: reproductive traits. Pages 73-90 in: Control of Fertility in Domestic Birds. J. P. Brillard, ed. INRA-Tours, France.
26. Smalec, E., 1991. Zróznicowanie gȩsi rezerwy genetycznej pod wzglédem cech użytkowych i polimorfizmu białek surowicy krwi. Zeszyty Nauk. Drob. Prace habilitacyjne, z. 3.
27. Tullett, S. G., 1990. Science and the art of incubation. Poultry Sci. 69:1-15.
28. Tullett, S. G., and S. Smith, 1983. A note of changes in egg shell porosity with flock age and season during the first breeding cycle of domestic ducks. Br. Poult. Sci. 24: 501-509.
29. Wilson, H. R., 1991. Interrelationships of egg size, chick size, posthatching growth and hatchability. World's Poult. Sci. J. 47:5-20.