Associative changes in elements and compounds when the other is reinforced

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 247-255

  Rescorla, Robert A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONED REFLEX; LEARNING; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0033113074     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.25.2.247     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brandon, S. E., & Wagner, A. R. (1998). Occasion setting: Influences of conditioned emotional responses and configural cues. In N. A. Schmajuk & P. C. Holland (Eds.), Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals (pp. 343-382). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Post-conditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 120-132.
3. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491-516.
4. Hall, G., Mackintosh, N. J., Goodall, G., & dal Martello, M. (1977). Loss of control by a less valid or less salient stimulus compounded with a better predictor of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 8, 145-158.
5. Holland, P. C. (1977). Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 77-104.
6. Kamin, L. J. (1968). Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimuli (pp. 9-32). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
7. Lattal, K. M., & Nakajima, S. (1998). Overexpectation in appetitive Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 26, 351-360.
8. LoLordo, V. M., Jacobs, W. J., & Foree, D. D. (1982). Failure to block control by a relevant stimulus. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 183-193.
9. Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 118-125.
10. Nakajima, S. (1997). Failure of inhibition by B over C after A+, AB-, ABC+ training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 482-490.
11. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 84, 61-73.
12. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-507.
13. Pearce, J. M., & Redhead, E. S. (1993). The influence of an irrelevant stimulus on two discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 180-190.
14. Pearce, J. M., & Redhead, E. S. (1995). Supernormal conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 155-165.
15. Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Conditioned inhibition of fear. In W. K. Honig & N. J. Mackintosh (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 65-89). Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University Press.
16. Rescorla, R. A. (1997). Summation: Assessment of a configural theory. Animal Learning and Behavior, 25, 200-209.
17. Rescorla, R. A. (in press). Summation and overexpectation with qualitatively different outcomes. Animal Learning and Behavior.
18. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
19. Schmajuk, N. A., & DiCarlo, J. J. (1992). Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and the hippocampus. Psychological Review, 99, 268-305.