Exact eigenstates of the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings model with the counter-rotating term

European Physical Journal D

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 119-126

  Ng, K M ^a   Lo, C F ^a   Liu, K L ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COUNTER ROTATING; COUPLING CONSTANTS; COUPLING PARAMETERS; EIGENENERGY SPECTRA; EIGENSTATES; ENERGY SPECTRUM; NON-ROTATING WAVE APPROXIMATION; ROTATING WAVE APPROXIMATIONS; SPECTRA'S; TWO-PHOTON JAYNES-CUMMINGS MODELS;

PHOTONS;

EID: 0033112408     PISSN: 14346060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/PL00021611     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. E.T. Jaynes, F.W. Cummings, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963).
2. P. Goy, J.M. Raimond, M. Gross, S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1903 (1983).
3. G. Gabrielse, H. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 67 (1985).
4. D. Meschede, H. Walther and G. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 551 (1985).
5. S. Haroche, J.M. Raimond, Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics edited by D.R. Bates and B. Bederson vol. 20 (Academic, New York, 1985) p. 347.
6. B.W. Shore, P.L. Knight, J. Mod. Optics 40, 1195 (1993).
7. B. Buck, C.V. Sukumar, Phys. Lett. A 81, 132 (1981).
8. G. S. Agarwal, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 480 (1985).
9. P. Zhou, J.S. Peng, Phys. Rev. A 44, 3331 (1991).
10. V. Bužek, B. Hladky, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1309 (1993).
11. M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. A 35, 154 (1987).
12. M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, P. Goy, L. Davidovich, S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1899 (1987).
13. M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, P. Goy, L. Davidovich, S. Haroche, IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 24, 1323 (1988).
14. I.D. Feranchuk, L.I. Komarov, A.P. Ulyanenkov, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29, 4035 (1996).
15. G.W. Ford, R.F. O'Connell, Physica A 243, 377 (1997).
16. C.F. Lo, K.L. Liu, K.M. Ng, Europhys. Lett. 42, 1 (1998).
17. A.M. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent State and its Applications (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986).
18. C.F. Lo, Eur. Phys. J. D 1, 93 (1998).
19. n|ψ〉 < ∞ for some finite t < ∞. See, for example, E. Nelson, Ann. Math. 70, 572 (1959); and M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol.I: Functional Analysis (Academic, New York, 1972), p. 201.
20. n|ψ〉 < ∞ for some finite t < ∞. See, for example, E. Nelson, Ann. Math. 70, 572 (1959); and M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol.I: Functional Analysis (Academic, New York, 1972), p. 201.
21. †, respectively. Only self-adjoint operators may be exponentiated to give unitary operators. For precise definitions and details see M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol.I: Functional Analysis (Academic, New York, 1972), p. 255.
22. V. Bartzis, N. Nayak, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8, 1779 (1991).
23. W. Vogel, R.L. de Matos Filho, Phys. Rev. A 52, 4214 (1995).
24. D.M. Meekhof, C. Monroe, B.E. King, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1796 (1996).
25. V. Bartzis, N. Nayak, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8, 1779 (1991).
26. This can be easily shown by applying the canonical transformation approach discussed in reference [24] to derive an effective Hamiltonian of the non-RWA three-level system, in which the single-photon counter-rotating terms are included.