Causes of excessive bitewing exposure: Results of a survey regarding radiographic equipment in New York

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 513-517

  Button, Terry M ^a   Moore, William C ^a   Goren, Arthur D ^b,c  

^a University Hospital

^b School of Veterinary Medicine   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LEGAL ASPECT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIOLOGY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW; X RAY FILM;

CHILD; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; NEW YORK; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; TECHNOLOGY, RADIOLOGIC; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0033111865     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70254-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bureau of Environmental Radiation Protection, New York State Department of Health. Certified radiation equipment safety officers manual, Albany, NY: The Department; 1989.
2. Goss K. The dental exposure normalization technique (DENT) program in Alberta. J Can Dent Assoc 1985;5:361-4.
3. Crabtree CL, James WR. Dental Exposure Normalization Technique, "DENT" Instruction Manual. Rockville, MD: US Dept Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Radiological Health. HEW Publication (FDA) 76-8042. Reprinted January 1981.
4. Goren AD, Sciubba JJ, Moskowitz GW, Mehta S, Theesfeld R. Dental radiographic normalization program (DENT): the experience in Nassau County, NY. NY State Dent J 1993;59:49-51.
5. Goren AD, Sciubba JJ, Moskowitz GW, Lorio PM, Heller MB. Certified radiation safety officers program: the Nassau County experience, 1990-1992. NY State Dent J 1993;59:63-5.
6. Platin E, Janhorn A, Tyndall D. A quantitative analysis of dental radiography quality assurance practices among North Carolina dentists. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:115-20.
7. Nakfoor CA, Brooks SL. Compliance of Michigan dentists with radiographic safety recommendations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:510-3.
8. Bohay RN, Kogon SL, Stephens RG. A survey of radiographic techniques and equipment used by a sample of general dental practitioners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:806-10.
9. Kaugers GE, Broga DW, Collett WK. Dental radiographic of Virginia and Florida. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;60:225-9.
10. Frederickson NL, Barnes GP, Parker WA. Survey of radiologic practice and facilities in Texas. J Dent Res 1988;67:255.
11. Kantor ML, Hunt RJ, Morris AL. An evaluation of radiographic practice and procedures in 300 dental offices in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:547-50.
12. Goren AD, Sciubba JJ, Friedman R, Malamud H. Survey of radiologic practices among dental practitioners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;67:464-8.
13. Platin E, Ludlow JB. Knowledge and adoption of radiographic quality assurance guidelines by general dentists in North Carolina. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:122-6.
14. Gibbs SJ, Pujol A, Chen T-S, Malcolm AW, James AE. Patient risk from interproximal radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:347-54.
15. US Food and Drug Administration. Quality assurance program for diagnostic radiology facilities: final recommendations (FDA 80-8110). Federal Register 1979;44:1728-40.
16. American Academy of Dental Radiology. Recommendations for quality assurance in dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;55:421-6.