The situation of oncological surgery in Germany in 1998: Current questionnaire results;Die Situation der onkologischen Chirurgie in Deutschland 1998: Aktuelle Umfrageergebnisse

Chirurg

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 400-406

  Bumm, R ^a   Siewert, J R ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Inquiry; Oncological surgery; Second opinion; Speciality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GERMANY; HUMAN; NEOPLASM; PATIENT REFERRAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

GERMANY; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 0033111744     PISSN: 00094722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001040050663     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Böttcher K, Siewert JR, Roder JD, Busch R, et al (1994) Deutsche Magencarcinom-Studiengruppe: Risiko der chirurgischen Therapie des Magencarcinoms in Deutschland. Chirurg 65: 298
2. Bumm R, Siewert JR (1997) Klinikmanual Chirurgie. http:// nt1.chir.med.tu-muenchen.de/manual/index.htm
3. Clarke JR (1989) Decision making in surgical practice. World J Surg 13: 245
4. Feussner H, Siewert JR (1996) Telemedizin - technische Möglichkeiten und sinvolle Anwendung. Chirurg 67: 984
5. Gertman PM, Stackpole DA, Levenson DK, Manuel BM, et al (1980) Second opinions for elective surgery. The mandatory medicaid program in Massachusetts. N Engl J Med 302: 1169
6. Graboys TB, Headley A, Lown B, Lampert S, Blatt CM (1987) Results of a second-opinion program for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 258: 1611
7. Grafe WR, McSherry CK, Finkel ML, McCarthy EG (1978) The Elective Surgery Second Opinion Program. Ann Surg 188: 323
8. Hempel K, Siewert JR (1996) "Second Opinion" - Versuch einer Begriffsbestimmung. Chirurg 67: 293
9. Hermanek P Jr, Wiebelt H, Riedl S, Staimmer D, Hermanek P (1994) Studiengruppe Kolorektales Karzinom: Langzeitergebnisse der chirurgischen Therapie des Coloncarcinoms. Chirurg 65: 287
10. International Union against Cancer (UICC), Hermanek P, Sobin LH (eds) (1992) TBM classification of malignant tumors, 4th edn, 2nd revision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
11. Kelsey JV, Beck JR (1990) The Effect of Decision Analysis on Clinical Uncertainity at Tumor Board. J Cancer Educ 5: 125
12. Lambert JC, Abernathy C, Waddell WR (1979) Cancer Care in the Small Hospital. Surg Clin North Am 59: 441
13. Leitlinien der wissenschaftlichen Fachgesellschaften (1998) http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/WWW/AWMF/
14. McCarthy EG, Finkel ML, Ruchlin HS (1981) Second opinions on elective surgery. The Cornell/New York Hospital study. Lancet I: 1352
15. McSherry CK, Chen PJ, Worner TM, Kupferstein N, McCharthy EG (1997) Second surgical opinion programs: dead or alive? J AM Coll Surg 195: 451
16. SGB V § 135(5) Qualitätssicherungspassus
17. Smith DE, Davis S, Polissar L (1997) The Hospital Cancer Programm: It's Impact On Care of the Rural Cancer Patient. Am Surg 45: 730
18. Stitt JA (1998) A system of tele-oncology at the university of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics and regional affiliate institutions. WMJ 97: 38
19. Vetto FT, Richard Boe K, Desler M, DuFrain L, Hagen H (1996) Tumor board formats: "fastcinating case" versus "working conference". J Cancer Educ 11: 84
20. Weiterbildungsordnung der Bayrischen Landesärztekammer (1998) http://www.blaek.de/weiterb/inhaltwo.htm
21. Yeo CJ, Cemeron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, et al (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990's: pathology, complications and outcomes. Ann Surg 226: 248