The utility of motion parallax information for the perception and control of heading

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 445-460

  Frey, Bernhard F ^a   Owen, Dean H ^b  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033111318     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.445     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Andersen, G. J. (1986). Perception of self-motion: Psychophysical and computational approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 52-65.
2. Andersen, G. J., & Braunstein, M. L. (1985). Induced self-motion in central vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 122-132.
3. Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (1995). Test of optic flow rule for turning into alignment with a runway during day and night flight [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 36, 359.
4. Bruss, A. R., & Horn, B. K. P. (1983). Passive navigation. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 21, 3-20.
5. Calvert, E. S. (1954). Visual judgements in motion. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 7, 233-251.
6. Crowell, J. A. (1997). Testing the Perrone and Stone (1994) model of heading estimation. Vision Research, 37, 1653-1671.
7. Crowell, J. A., & Banks, M. S. (1993). Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 325-337.
8. Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Cutting, J. E. (1991). Optical flow versus retinal flow as sources of information for flight guidance. In W. W. Johnson & M. K. Kaiser (Eds.), Visually guided control of movement (pp. 75-85). Moffet Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
10. Cutting, J. E. (1996). Wayfinding from multiple sources of local information in retinal flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1299-1313.
11. Cutting, J. E., Springer, K., Braren, P. A., & Johnson, S. A. (1992). Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 41-72.
12. Cutting, J. E., Vishton, P. M., & Braren, P. M. (1995). How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving objects. Psychological Review, 102, 627-651.
13. Cutting, J. E., Vishton, P. M., Flückiger, M., Baumberger, B., & Gerndt, J. D. (1997). Heading and path information from retinal flow in naturalistic environments. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 426-441.
14. Flach, J. M., Hagen, B. A., & Larish, J. F. (1992). Active regulation of altitude as a function of optical texture. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 557-568.
15. Gibson, J. J. (1947). Motion picture testing and research (AAF Aviation Psychology Program Rep. No. 7). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Gibson, J. J. (1950). Perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Gibson, J. J., Olum, P., & Rosenblatt, F. (1955). Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 372-385.
19. Heeger, D. J., & Jepson, A. D. (1992). Subspace methods for recovering rigid motion: I. Algorithm and implementation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 7, 95-177.
20. Hildreth, E. C. (1992). Recovering heading for visually guided navigation. Vision Research, 32, 1177-1192.
21. Johnson, W. W., Tsang, P. S., Bennett, T. C., & Phatak, A. V. (1989, February). The visually guided control of altitude. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, pp. 152-156.
22. Johnston, I. R., White, G. R., & Cumming, R. W. (1973). The role of optical expansion patterns in locomotor control. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 311-324.
23. Kim, N. G., Growney, R., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Optical flow, not retinal flow is the basis of wayfinding by foot. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1279-1288.
24. Kim, N. G., Turvey, M. T., & Growney, R. (1996). Wayfinding and the sampling of optical flow by eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1314-1319.
25. Land, M. F., & Lee, D. N. (1994). Where we look when we steer. Nature, 369, 742-744.
26. Lappe, M., & Rauschecker, J. P. (1993). A neural network for the processing of optic flow from ego-motion in man and higher mammals. Neural Computation, 5, 374-391.
27. Larish, J. F., & Andersen, G. J. (1991). Active control versus passive observation in a simulated flight task. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 35, 1570-1573.
28. Laudeman, I. V., & Johnson, W. W. (1993). Situational awareness: Passive observation and active control. In S. S. Valenti & J. P. Pittenger (Eds.), Studies in perception and action: II. Posters presented at the VIIth International Conference on Event Perception and Action (pp. 341-343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of breaking based on information about time to collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
30. Lee, D., & Lishman, J. (1975). Visual proprioceptive control of stance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1, 87-95.
31. Lee, D. N., & Lishman, R. (1977). Visual control of locomotion. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 224-230.
32. Levison, W. H., & Warren, R. (1984). Use of linear perspective scene cues in a simulated height regulation task. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Manual Control, June 12-14 (pp. 467-490). Moffet Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
33. Lishman, J., & Lee, D. (1973). The autonomy of visual kinaesthesis. Perception, 2, 287-294.
34. Llewellyn, K. R. (1971). Visual guidance in locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 91, 245-261.
35. Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Prazdny, K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 223, 165-175.
36. Loomis, J. M., & Beall, A. C. (1992). Optic flow rule for controlling curvilinear approach to a straight path [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 33, 1370.
37. Ono, M. E., Rivest, J., & Ono, H. (1986). Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 331-337.
38. Owen, D. H. (1990). Perception and control of changes in self-motion: A functional approach to the study of information and skill. In R. Warren & A. H. Wertheim (Eds.), Perception and control of self-motion (pp. 289-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Owen, D. H., Florence-Bennett, B. J., & Frey, B. F. (1994). Alternative modes of control and visual information for rotocraft flight: Control of hover and descent to touchdown (Tech. Rep. No. NAGW-2170). Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury, Department of Psychology, Simulation Laboratory.
40. Owen, D. H., & Warren, R. (1982). Optical variables as measures of performance during simulated flight. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 26, 312-316.
41. Owen, D. H., & Wolpert, L. (1987). Perceiving and controlling changes in altitude. In D. H. Owen (Ed.), Perception and control of simulated self motion (Tech. Rep. No. AFHRL-TR-87-16). Columbus: Ohio State University.
42. Perrone, J. A. (1992). Model for the computation of self-motion in biological systems. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A9, 177-194.
43. Perrone, J. A., & Stone, L. S. (1994). Model of self-motion estimation within primate extrastriate visual cortex. Vision Research, 34, 2917-2938.
44. Regan, D., & Beverley, K. I. (1982). How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving. Science, 215, 194-196.
45. Rieger, J. H., & Lawton, D. T. (1985). Processing differential image motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A2, 354-360.
46. Rieger, J. H., & Toet, L. (1985). Human visual navigation in the presence of 3-D rotations. Biological Cybernetics, 52, 377-381.
47. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8, 125-134.
48. Royden, C. S., Banks, M. S., & Crowell, J. A. (1992). The perception of heading during eye movements. Nature, 360, 583-585.
49. Royden, C. S., Crowell, J. A., & Banks, M. S. (1994). Estimating heading during eye movements. Vision Research, 34, 3197-3214.
50. Stoffregen, T. A. (1985). Row structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 554-565.
51. Stone, L. S., & Perrone, J. A. (1997). Human heading estimation during visually simulated curvilinear motion. Vision Research, 37, 573-590.
52. Turano, K., & Wang, X. (1994). Visual discrimination between a curved and straight path of self motion: Effects of forward speed. Vision Research, 34, 107-114.
53. van den Berg, A. V. (1992). Robustness of perception of heading from optic flow. Vision Research, 32, 1285-1296.
54. Vishton, P. M., & Cutting, J. E. (1995). Wayfinding, displacement, and mental maps: Velocity fields are not typically used to determine one's aimpoint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 978-995.
55. Wann, J., Rushton, S., & Lee, D. (1995). Can you control where you are heading when you are looking where you want to go? In B. G. Bardy, R. J. Bootsma, & Y. Guiard (Eds.), Studies in perception and action: III. Eighth International Conference on Perception and Action (pp. 171-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Warren, R. (1976). The perception of egomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 448-456.
57. Warren, R. (1982). Optical transformation during movement: Review of the optical concomitants of egomotion (Tech. Rep. No. AFOSR-81-0108). Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology.
58. Warren, R. (1988, November). Visual perception in high-speed low-altitude flight. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, A116-A124.
59. Warren, R., & McMillan, G. R. (1984). Altitude control using action-demanding interactive displays: Towards an active psychophysics. In Proceedings of the 1984 Image III Conference (pp. 37-51). Phoenix, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
60. Warren, W. H., Blackwell, A. W., & Morris, M. W. (1989). Age differences in perceiving the direction of self-motion from optical flow. Journal of Gerontology, 44, P147-P153.
61. Warren, W. H., & Hannon, D. J. (1988). Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow. Nature, 336, 162-163.
62. Warren, W. H., & Hannon, D. J. (1990). Eye movements and optical flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A7, 160-169.
63. Warren, W. H., & Kurtz, K. J. (1992). The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 443-454.
64. Warren, W. H., Mestre, D. R., Blackwell, A. W., & Morris, M. W. (1991). Perception of circular heading from optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 28-43.
65. Warren, W. H., Morris, M. W., & Kalish, M. (1988). Perception of translational heading from optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 646-660.
66. Waxman, A. M., & Ullman, S. (1985). Surface structure and 3D motion from image flow: A kinematic analysis. International Journal of Robotics Research, 4, 72-94.
67. Wickens, C. D., & Kessel, C. (1980). The processing resource demands of failure detection in dynamic systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 564-577.
68. Wolpert, L. (1990). Field-of-view information for self-motion perception. In R. Warren & A. H. Wertheim (Eds.), Perception and control of self-motion (pp. 101-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Wolpert, L., & Owen, D. H. (1987). The isolation of optical information and its metrics for the detection of descent: Optical flow and texture variables useful in simulating self-motion II (Tech. Rep. No. AFOSR-81-0078). Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology, Aviation Laboratory.