Analyte comparisons between 2 clinical chemistry analyzers

Canadian Veterinary Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 255-260

  Sutton, Alison ^a   Dawson, Hilary ^a   Hoff, Brent ^a   Grift, Evert ^a   Shoukri, Mohammed ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; CAT; DOG; LABORATORY; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; URINALYSIS; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMALS; BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CATS; DOGS; LABORATORIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINALYSIS; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

EID: 0033110946     PISSN: 00085286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Vap LM, Mitzner B. An update on chemistry analyzers. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1996: 1136. 1138. 1143-1145.
2. Boehringer Mannheim/Hitachi 911 System Operator's Manual. Version A. Boehringer Mannheim Corporation, Diagnostic Laboratory Systems Division. Technical Publications Department. 1993.
3. VetScan Operator's Manual. Sunnyvale. California: Abaxis Inc. 1995.
4. Shoukri MM, Edge VL. Statistical Methods for Health Sciences. New York:CRC Press, 1996: 35-40.
5. Bland JM, Altman DO. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 (8, Feb): 307-310.
6. Peters T. Galen RS. Analytical goals and clinical relevance of laboratory procedures. In: Teitz NW, ed. Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1986: 387-392.