Mandibular shape and skeletal divergency

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 145-153

  Ferrario, Virgilio F ^a   Sforza, Chiarella ^b   De Franco, David J ^b  

^a Istituto di Anatomia Umana Normale   (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; FACIAL BONE; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; JAW; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; PATHOLOGY; TOOTH ARCH;

ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHMS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; DENTAL ARCH; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE;

EID: 0033109969     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/21.2.145     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Enlow D H, Moyers R E, Hunter W S, McNamara J A Jr 1969 A procedure for the analysis of intrinsic facial form and growth. American Journal of Orthodontics 56: 6-23
2. Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Miani A Jr, D'Addona A, Todisco M 1991 Cephalometrics and facial shape: new thresholds by an overall approach to classic standards. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 6: 261-269
3. Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Germanò D, Dalloca L L, Miani A Jr 1994a Head postures and cephalometric analyses: an integrated photographic/radiographic technique. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 106: 257-264
4. Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Serrao G, Frattini T, Del Favero C 1994b Shape of the human corpus callosum: elliptic Fourier analysis on midsagittal magnetic resonance scans. Investigative Radiology 29: 677-681
5. Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Schmitz J, Miani A Jr, Taroni G 1995 Fourier analysis of human soft tissue facial shape: sex differences in normal adults. Journal of Anatomy 187: 593-602
6. Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Guazzi M, Serrao G 1996 Elliptic Fourier analysis of mandibular shape. Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology 16: 208-217
7. Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Poggio C E, Colombo A, Cova M 1997 Effect of growth and development on cephalometric shapes in orthodontic patients: a Fourier analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics 19: 669-680
8. Fine M 1994 Skeletal jaw relationships (Commentary to Lowe et al., 1994). Angle Orthodontist 64: 309-310
9. Halazonetis D J, Shapiro E, Gheewalla R K, Clark R E 1991 Quantitative description of the shape of the mandible. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 99: 49-56
10. Hurmerinta K, Rahkamo A, Havikko K 1997 Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships. European Journal of Oral Sciences 105: 221-227
11. Ingervall B, Minder C 1997 Correlation between maximum bite force and facial morphology in children. Angle Orthodontist 67: 415-424
12. Isaacson J R, Isaacson R J, Speidel T M, Worms F W 1971 Extreme variation in vertical face growth and associated variation in the skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthodontist 41: 219-229
13. Karlsen A T 1995 Craniofacial growth differences between low and high MP-SN angle males: a longitudinal study. Angle Orthodontist 65: 341-350
14. Kerr W J S, Miller S, Ayme B, Wilhelm N 1994 Mandibular form and position in 10-year-old boys. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 106: 115-120
15. Kuhl F P, Giardina C R 1982 Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18: 236-258
16. Lestrel P E 1989 Some approaches toward the mathematical modeling of the craniofacial complex. Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology 9: 77-91
17. Lestrel P E, Kerr W J S 1993 Quantification of function regulator therapy using elliptical Fourier functions. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 481-491
18. Lestrel P E, Kimbel W H, Prior F W, Fleischmann M L 1977 Size and shape of the hominoid distal femur: Fourier analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 46: 281-290
19. Lowe B F Jr, Phillips C, Lestrel P E, Fields H W Jr 1994 Skeletal jaw relationships: a quantitative assessment using elliptical Fourier functions. Angle Orthodontist 64: 299-308
20. Mavreas D, Melsen B 1997 Changes in the mechanical advantage of the masseter and temporal muscles following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 12: 215-225
21. Merow W W, Broadbent B H Jr 1990 Cephalometrics. In: Enlow D H (ed.) Facial growth. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 3rd edn., pp. 346-395
22. Miralles R et al. 1991 Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types. Angle Orthodontist 61: 277-283
23. Moorrees C F A et al. 1976 New norms for the mesh diagram analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics 69: 57-71
24. Siriwat P P, Jarabak J R 1985 Malocclusion and facial morphology: is there a relationship? Angle Orthodontist 55: 127-138
25. Steiner C C 1953 Cephalometrics for you and me. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 729-755
26. Tanner J M 1978 Foetus into man. Physical growth from conception to maturity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
27. van Spronsen P H et al. 1997 Relationship between the orientation and moment arms of the human jaw muscles and normal craniofacial morphology. European Journal of Orthodontics 19: 313-328