Surround articulation. II. Lightness judgments

Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 804-811

  Schirillo, James A ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LIGHT; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0033109724     PISSN: 10847529     EISSN: 15208532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.16.000804     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. J. A. Schirillo, “Surround articulation. II. Brightness judgments,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 793–803 (1999).
2. L. E. Arend and R. Goldstein, “Simultaneous constancy, lightness, and brightness,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2281–2285 (1987).
3. L. E. Arend and B. Spehar, “Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 1. Illuminance variation,” Percept. Psychophys. 54, 446–456 (1993).
4. L. E. Arend and B. Spehar, “Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 2. Reflectance variation,” Percept. Psychophys. 54, 457–468 (1993).
5. A. L. Gilchrist, “Lightness contrast and failures of constancy: a common explanation,” Percept. Psychophys. 43, 415–424 (1988).
6. W. Burzlaff, “Methodologische beitrage zum Problem der Farbenkonstanz,” Z. Psychol. 119, 117–235 (1931).
7. A. Gelb, “Die Farbenkonstanz der Sehdinge,” (1929) in A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, translated by W. D. Ellis (The Humanities Press, New York, 1938): “…colour constancy was manifested only when an adequate and uninterrupted survey of the existing illumination was permitted. Anything hindering such a survey (e.g., the reduction screen, minimal observation time, etc.) either destroyed or reduced the phenomenon. One of the most important conditions is that the visual angle be large and the field richly articulated” (p. 201).
8. R. H. Henneman, “A photometric study of the perception of object color,” Arch. Psychol. 179, 5–89 (1935): “ ‘Articulation of the visual field’ has become recognized as an essential condition for the appearance of ‘constancy’ phenomena, though this rather vague term is badly in need of clearer definition and explanation” (p. 23)
9. G. Katona, “Color contrast and color constancy,” J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 49–63 (1935). “I have found that constancy effects are mainly furthered by enrichment of the perception through better organization, more contours, more form and object-characters, movement, etc.” (p. 61).
10. R. B. MacLeod, “An experimental investigation of brightness constancy,” Arch. Psychol. 135, 5–102 (1932). “When, for instance a section of one’s surroundings is seen as shadowed it is of consequence whether or not the shadow occupies a large visual angle and whether the shadowed sector includes a variety of objects” (p. 32).
11. L. E. Marks, “Intermodal similarity and cross-modality matching: coding perceptual dimensions,” in Geometric Representations of Perceptual Phenomenon, R. D. Luce, M. D’Zmura, D. Hoffman, G. J. Iverson, and A. K. Romney, eds. (Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J., 1995), pp. 207–233.
12. A. L. Gilchrist, S. Delman, and A. Jacobsen, “The classification and integration of edges as critical to the perception of reflectance and illumination,” Percept. Psychophys. 33, 425–436 (1983).
13. J. A. Schirillo and S. K. Shevell, “An account of brightness in complex scenes based on inferred illumination,” Perception 26, 507–518 (1997).
14. J. Cataliotti and A. Gilchrist, “Local and global processes in surface lightness perception,” Percept. Psychophys. 57, 125–135 (1995).
15. R. Evans and J. Klute, “Brightness constancy in photographic reproduction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 34, 540–553 (1944).
16. H. Helson, “Some factors and implications of color constancy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 33, 555–567 (1943).
17. L. Jones and H. Condit, “The brightness scale of exterior scenes and the computation of correct photographic exposure,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 31, 651–678 (1941).
18. R. Shapley and R. Reid, “Contrast and assimilation in the perception of brightness,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 5983–5986 (1985).
19. E. H. Adelson, “Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness,” Science 262, 2042–2944 (1993).