Cytology alone versus cytology and cervicography for cervical cancer screening: A randomized study

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 353-358

  Autier, Philippe ^a   Coibion, Michel ^a   De sutter, Philippe ^a   Wayemberg, Marc ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0033105958     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00472-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Laara E., Day N.E., Hakama M. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries Association with organised screening programmes . Lancet. 1:1987;1247-1249.
2. Mitchell H., Giles G. Cancer diagnosis after a report of negative cervical cytology. Med J Aust. 164:1996;270-273.
3. Sasieni P.D., Cuzick J., Lynch-Farmery E. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. Br J Cancer. 73:1996;1001-1005.
4. Slater D.N., Milner P.C., Radley H. Audit of deaths from cervical cancer Proposal for an essential component of the national screening programme . J Clin Pathol. 47:1994;27-28.
5. Stafl A. Cervicography A new method for cervical cancer detection . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 139:1981;815-825.
6. Coppleson M., Monaghan J.M., Morrow C.P., Tattersall M.H.N. Gynecologic oncology Fundamental principles and practice . 2nd ed. 1992;Churchill Linvingstone, London.
7. Mitchell H. Is there a role for screening by cervicography in Australia? Med J Aust. 150:1989;441-444.
8. Szarewski A., Cuzick J., Edwards R., Butler B., Singer A. The use of cervicography in a primary screening service. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 98:1991;313-317.
9. Coibion M., Autier P., Vandam P., Delobelle A., Huet F., Hertens D., et al. Is there a role for cervicography in the detection of the pre-malignant lesions of the cervix uteri? Br J Cancer. 70:1994;125-128.
10. De Sutter P., Coibion M., Vosse M., Huet F., Wesling F., Wayenberg M., et al. A multicenter study comparing cervicography and cytology in the detection of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 105:1998;613-620.
11. Manos MM, Wright DK, Lewis AJ, Broker TR, Wolinsky SM. The use of polymerase-chain-reaction amplification for the detection of genital papillomaviruses. In: Furth M, Greaves M, eds. Molecular diagnostics of human cancer, cancer cells 7. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1989: 209-4.
12. Nuovo G. PCR in situ hybridization Protocol and applications . 1992;63-81 Raven Press, New York.
13. Ting Y., Manes M.M. Detection and typing of genital human papillomaviruses. Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J., White T., PCR protocols A guide to methods and applications . 1990;356-371 Academic Press, San Diego.
14. Sangiuolo F., De Santis L., Cavicchini A., Angeloni U., Romanini C., Novelli G. A new method for direct analysis of PCR amplified human papillomavirus using DNA enzyme immunoessay (DEAI). Int J Clin Lab Res. 24:1994;223-226.
15. Mitchell H., Medley G., Giles G. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology Perspective in the 1980s . BMJ. 300:1990;1622-1626.
16. van Oortmarssen, Habbema JFD. Cervical cancer screening data from two cohorts in British Columbia. In: Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix. Hakama M, Miller AB, Day NE, eds. IARC Scientific Publication No. 76. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1986: 47-60.
17. Choi NW, Nelson NA. Results from a cervical cancer screening programme in Manitoba, Canada. In: Hakama M, Miller AB, Day NE, eds. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix. IARC Scientific Publication No. 76. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1986: 61-8.
18. Pettersson F, Näslund I, Malker B. Evaluation of the effect of Papanicolaou screening in Sweden: Record linkage between a central screening registry and the National Cancer Registry. In: Hakama M, Miller AB, Day NE, eds. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix. IARC Scientific Publication No. 76. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1986:91-108.