Confidentiality and the courts

Medical Journal of Australia

Volumn 170, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 222-224

  Gerber, Paul ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; COURT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; SHORT SURVEY; WITNESS;

EID: 0033104655     PISSN: 0025729X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb140326.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Evidence Act 1995 (Cwlth), sec 55: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), sec 55.
2. Australian Medical Association. AMA Code of Ethics. Canberra AMA, 1996.
3. Attorney-General v Mulholland [1963] 2 QB 477.
4. Re Buchanan [1964-5] NSWR 1379.
5. Hunter v Mann [1974] QB 767.
6. Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California 529 P 2d 253 (1974).
7. Motor Vehicle Act 1959 (SA), sec 148.
8. Traffic Act 1909 (NSW), sec 17A.
9. Duncan v Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee [1986] 1 NZLR 513.
10. Furniss v Fitchett [1958] NZLR 396