Asymptotic commutativity of differentiation and discretization in shape optimization

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 19-37

  Peichl, G H ^a   Ring, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Finite element approximation; Sensitivity analysis; Shape optimization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033103575     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7177(99)00047-3     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. K. Kunisch and G. Peichl, Shape optimization for mixed boundary value problems based on an embedding domain method, Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems 4, 439-478, (1998).
2. J. Haslinger and P. Neittaanmäki, Finite Element Approximation for Optimal Shape, Material and Topology Design, Second Edition, Wiley, Chichester, (1996).
3. J. Haslinger and D. Jedelský, Genetic algorithms and fictitious domain based approaches in shape optimization, Struct. Optim. (to appear).
4. J. Burkardt, M. Gunzburger and J. Peterson, Discretization of cost and sensitivities in shape optimization, In Computation and Control IV, (Edited by K.L. Bowers and J. Lund), Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, (1995).
5. J. Borggaard, J.A. Burns, E. Cliff and M. Gunzburger, Sensitivity Calculations for a 2d, Inviscid, Supersonic Forebody Problem, ICASE Report 93-13, (1993).
6. O. Pironneau, Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems, Springer Verlag, New York, (1984).
7. G. Peichl and W. Ring, Optimization of the shape of an electromagnet, Advances in Mathematical Sciences and Applications 8, 997-1014, (1998).
8. J. Neěas, Les Méthodes Directes en Théorie des Équations Elliptiques, Masson, Paris, (1967).
9. J. Wloka, Partielle Differentialgleichungen, Teubner, Stuttgart, (1982).
10. G. Steward and J.-G. Sun, Matrix Perturbation Theory, Computer Science and Scientific Computing, Academic Press, Boston, MA, (1990).