The most widely distributed trilobite species: Ordovician Carolinites genacinaca

Journal of Paleontology

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 202-218

  McCormick, Tim ^a   Fortey, Richard A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAROLINITES; CAROLINITES GENACINACA; CAROLINITES TASMANIENSIS; CAROLINITES VIZCAINOI; CRUSTACEA; INVERTEBRATA; TRILOBITOMORPHA;

EID: 0033103078     PISSN: 00223360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022336000027724     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. ACEÑOLAZA, F. G., AND G. F. ACEÑOLAZA. 1992. The genus Jujuyaspis as a world reference fossil for the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary, p. 115-120. In B. D. Webby and J. R. Laurie (eds.), Global Perspectives on Ordovician Geology. 6th International Symposium on the Ordovician System, 15-19 July 1991, Sydney, Australia.
2. AUFFRAY, J.-C., P. ALIBERT, S. RENAUD, A. ORTH, AND F. BONHOMME. 1996. Fluctuating asymmetry in Mus musculus subspecific hybridization: Traditional and Procrustes comparative approach, p. 275-283. In L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice (eds.). Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series, Series A: Life Sciences. Plenum Press, New York.
3. BALASHOVA, E. A. 1961. The discovery of a new trilobite from the Glauconitic series of the Baltic area. Paleontological Journal 3-129-132. (In Russian)
4. BENSON, R. H. 1976. The evolution of the ostracode Costa analyzed by "Theta-Rho difference." Abhandlungen und Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg. N.F., 18/19 (Suppl.): 127-139.
5. -. 1982. Deformation, Da Vinci's concept of form, and the analysis of events in evolutionary history, p. 241-277. In E. M. Gallitelli (ed.), Palaeontology, Essential of Historical Geology. S. T. E. M. Mucchi. Modena. Italy.
6. -. 1983. Biomechanical stability and sudden change in the evolution of the deep-sea ostracode Poseidonamicus. Paleobiology, 9:398-413.
7. -, R. E. CHAPMAN, AND A. F. SIEGEL. 1982. On the measurement of morphology and its change. Paleobiology, 8:328-339.
8. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 435 p.
9. CHAPMAN, R. E. 1990a. Conventional Procrustes approaches, p. 251-267. In F J. Rohlf and F. L. Bookstein (eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication Number 2, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.
10. -. 1990b. Shape analysis in the study of dinosaur morphology, p. 21-42. In K. Carpenter and P. J. Currie (eds.), Dinosaur Systematics: Perspectives and Approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. CHUGAEVA, M. N. 1964. Early and Middle Ordovician trilobites in the north-east of the U.S.S.R. In M. N. Chugaeva, Kh. S. Rozman, and V. A. Ivanova, Comparative biostratigraphy of Ordovician deposits in the north-east of the USSR. Transactions of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. Geological Institute. 106:24-75. (In Russian)
12. -. 1973. Trilobites. In M. N. Chugaeva, V. A. Ivanova, M. M. Oradovskaya and V. N. Yakovlev, Biostratigraphy of the lower part of the Ordovician in the north-east of the U.S.S.R. and biogeography of the uppermost lower Ordovician. Transactions of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. Geological Institute, 213:43-121. (In Russian)
13. COCKS, L. R. M., AND R. A. FORTEY. 1990. Biogeography of Ordovician and Silurian faunas, p. 97-104. In W. S. McKerrow and C. R. Scotese (eds.), Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography. Geological Society Memoir, 12.
14. COOPER, R. A, R. A. FORTEY, AND K. LINDHOLM. 1991. Latitudinal and depth zonation of early Ordovician graptolites. Lethaia, 24:199-218.
15. DEAN, W. T. 1973a. Ordovician trilobites from the Keele Range, northwestern Yukon Territory. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 223: 1-43.
16. -. 1973b. The Lower Palaeozoic stratigraphy and faunas of the Taurus Mountains near Beysehir, Turkey. III. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology, 24:279-348.
17. -. 1989. Trilobites from the Survey Peak, Outram and Skoki formations (Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician) at Wilcox Pass, Jasper National Park, Alberta. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin, 389: 1-141.
18. ETHERIDGE, R. 1919. The Cambrian trilobites of Australia and Tasmania. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 43:373-393.
19. FORTEY, R. A. 1974. A new pelagic trilobite from the Ordovician of Spitsbergen, western Ireland and Utah. Palaeontology, 17:111-124.
20. -. 1975a. Early Ordovician trilobite communities. Fossils and Strata, 4:331-352.
21. -. 1975b. The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen. II. Asaphidae, Nileidae, Raphiophoridae and Telephinidae of the Valhallfonna Formation. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter, 162:1-207.
22. -. 1985. Pelagic trilobites as an example of deducing the life habits of extinct arthropods. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 76:219-230.
23. -, AND R. M. OWENS. 1997. Evolutionary history, p. O249-O287. In R. L. Kaesler (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. O, Trilobita 1, Revised. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.
24. GOWER, J. C. 1975. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40: 33-51.
25. HARRINGTON, H. J., AND A. F. LEANZA. 1957. Ordovician trilobites of Argentina. Special Publication of the Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1:1-276.
26. HENDERSON, R. A. 1983. Early Ordovician faunas from the Mount Windsor Subprovince, northeastern Queensland. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 1:145-175.
27. HENNINGSMOEN, G. 1957. The trilobite family Olenidae. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske Videnskaps-Akadami i Oslo. 1. Mathematics and Natural Sciences. 1:1-303.
28. HINTZE, L. F. 1951. Lower Ordovician detailed stratigraphie sections for western Utah of particular interest to geologists concerned with petroleum possibilities of the Great Basin. Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey Bulletin, 39:1-99.
29. -. 1953. Lower Ordovician trilobites from western Utah and eastern Nevada. Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey Bulletin 48-1-249.
30. HUGHES, N. C., AND R. E. CHAPMAN. 1995. Growth and variation in the Silurian proetide trilobite Aulacopleura konincki and its implications for trilobite palaeobiology. Lethaia, 28:333-353.
31. IMBRIE, J. 1956. Biometrical methods in the study of invertebrate fossils. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 108:211-252.
32. JELL, P. A., AND B. STAIT. 1985. Revision of an early Arenig trilobite faunule from the Caroline Creek Sandstone, near Latrobe, Tasmania. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria, 46:35-51.
33. KOBAYASHI, T. 1940. Lower Ordovician fossils from Caroline Creek, near Latrobe, Mersey River District, Tasmania. Royal Society of Tasmania, Papers and Proceedings for 1939:67-76.
34. LEGG, D. P. 1976. Ordovician trilobites and graptolites from the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Geologica et Palaeontologica 10: 1-58.
35. LEHMANN, E. 1975. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods based on Ranks. Holden-Day, Oakland, California.
36. LOVY, D. 1995. WinDig, Release 2.0. Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva.
37. Lu, Y-H. 1975. Ordovician trilobite faunas of central and southwestern China. Palaeontologia Sinica (B), 152(11): 1-463. (In Chinese)
38. MARCUS, L. F. 1993. Some aspects of multivariate statistics for morphometrics, p. 96-130. In L. F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. GarcíaValdecasas (eds.), Contributions to Morphometrics. Monografias del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 8. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid.
39. -, AND M. CORTI. 1996. Overview of the new, or geometric morphometrics, p. 1-13. In L. E Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice (eds.), Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series, Series A: Life Sciences. Plenum Press, New York.
40. MCCORMICK, T., AND R. A. FORTEY. 1998. Independent testing of a paleobiological hypothesis: the optical design of two Ordovician pelagic trilobites reveals their relative paleobathymetry. Paleobiology, 24:235-253.
41. PILLET, J. 1988. Quelques trilobites rares de l'Ordovicien inférieur de la Montagne Noire. Bulletin de la société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 124:89-99.
42. -. 1990. A propos de Carolinites vizcainoi Pillet 1988. Bulletin de la société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 126:97.
43. QIU, H.-A., ET AL. 1983. Paleontological Atlas of eastern China. 1. Lower Paleozoic. Geological Press, Beijing, 657 p. (In Chinese)
44. RAYNER, J. M. V. 1985. Linear relations in biomechanics: the statistics of scaling functions. Journal of Zoology, 206:415-439.
45. REILLY, S. 1990. Comparative ontogeny of cranial shape in salamanders using resistant fit theta rho analysis, p. 311-321. In F. J. Rohlf and F. L. Bookstein (eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication Number 2, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.
46. ROHLF, F. J. 1990. Rotational fit (Procrustes) methods, p. 227-236. In F. J. Rohlf and F. L. Bookstein (eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication Number 2, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.
47. -, AND D. SLICE. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39: 40-59.
48. Ross, R. J., JR. 1951. Stratigraphy of the Garden City Formation in Northeastern Utah, and its trilobite faunas. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, 6:1-161.
49. -. 1967. Some Middle Ordovician brachiopods and trilobites from the Basin Ranges, western United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 523D:1-43.
50. -. 1972. Fossils from the Ordovician bioherm at Meiklejohn Peak, Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 685:1-47.
51. SIEGEL, A. F., AND R. H. BENSON. 1982. A robust comparison of biological shapes. Biometrics, 38:341-350.
52. SLICE, D. E. 1994. GRF-ND: Generalized Rotational Fitting of N-dimensional Data, Revision 11-01-94. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York. 11794.
53. -. 1996. Three-dimensional generalized resistant fitting and the comparison of least-squares and resistant-fit residuals, p. 179-199. In L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice (eds.), Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series, Series A: Life Sciences. Plenum Press, New York.
54. -, F. L. BOOKSTEIN, L. F. MARCUS, AND F. J. ROHLF. 1996. Appendix I: a glossary for geometric morphometrics, p. 531-551. In L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice (eds.), Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series. Series A: Life Sciences. Plenum Press, New York.
55. SNEATH, P. H. A. 1967. Trend-surface analysis of transformation grids. Journal of Zoology, 151:65-122.
56. STUBBLEFIELD, C. J. 1950. A new komaspid trilobite genus of wide distribution in early Ordovician times. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 12, 3:341-352.
57. TAYLOR, M. E., AND R. M. FORESTER. 1979. Distributional model for marine isopod crustaceans and its bearing on early Palaeozoic palaeozoogeography and continental drift. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 90:405-413.
58. THOMPSON, D. W. 1917. On Growth and Form. Cambridge, London, 793 p.
59. WALKER, J. A. 1993. Ontogenetic allometry of threespine stickleback body form using landmark-based morphometrics, p. 193-214. In L. F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. Garcia-Valdecasas (eds.), Contributions to Morphometrics. Monografias del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 8. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid.
60. WHITTINGTON, H. B. 1963. Middle Ordovician trilobites from Lower Head, western Newfoundland. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard, 129:1-118.