The visual effect of felling on small and medium-scale landscapes in north-eastern Finland

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 167-181

  Karjalainen, E ^a   Komulainen, M ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Forestry; Landscape architecture; Landscape management; Landscape preferences; Visual quality

Indexed keywords

TIMBER;

DESIGN PRINCIPLES; LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE; LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE PREFERENCES; LOGGING OPERATIONS; MEDIUM-SCALE; SMALL SCALE; VISUAL DESIGN; VISUAL EFFECTS; VISUAL QUALITIES;

FORESTRY;

LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LOGGING; PERCEPTION; RURAL LANDSCAPE; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FINLAND; FORESTRY; LAND USE; PUBLIC OPINION;

FINLAND;

EID: 0033102296     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jema.1998.0238     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, L. M. (1981). Land use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in forest landscapes. Forest Science 27, 392-400.
2. Antikainen, M. (1993). Metsämaiseman suunnittelu Kolin kansallispuistossa. [Forest landscape planning in Koli national park.] Finnish Forest Research Institute Research Papers No. 456. (In Finnish with English summary)
3. Antikainen, M. and Tolonen, J. (eds) (1994). Melalahden maisemasuunnitelma. [Village landscape plan of Melalahti]. Publications of Forest Centre Tapio No. 7, 1994, Paltamo: Paltamon Kirjapaino Ky. (In Finnish)
4. Bell, S. (1993). Elements of Visual Design in the Landscape. London: E & FN Spon.
5. Bell, S. (1994). Visual Landscape Design Training Manual. Forest Service, British Columbia, Recreation Branch Publication, No. 2.
6. Crowe, S. (1978). The landscape of forests and woods. Forestry Commission Booklet No. 44. London: HMSO.
7. Daniel T. C. and Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape aesthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. Forest Service Research Paper RM-167.
8. Diaz, N. and Apostol, D. (1992). Forest Landscape Analysis and Design. A Process for Developing and Implementing Land Management Objectives for Landscape Patterns. USDA Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Region.
9. Ett öppnare landskap (1973). Statens Naturvårdsverk, Publikationer No. 10. Stockholm: Ljunglöfs. (In Swedish)
10. Forestry Authority (1992). Lowland Landscape Design Guidelines. London: HMSO.
11. Forestry Centre Tapio (1994). Good Forests for the Good of All. Lahti: Esan Kirjapaino Oy.
12. Forestry Commission (1989). Forest Landscape Design Guidelines. London: HMSO.
13. Gustavsson, R. and Ingelög, T. (1994). Det Nya Landskapet. [The New Landscape]. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen. (In Swedish)
14. Haakenstad, H. (1972). Skogbehandling i et utfartsomräde, en opinionsundersokelse om Oslomarka. [Silviculture in recreation area, opinion survey in Oslomarka.] Meldinger fra Norges Landbrukshogskole, No 51(16). (In Norwegian)
15. Hallikainen, V. (1995). Recreational use of Finnish wildernesses and the scenic factors affecting wilderness experience. In Northern Wilderness Areas: Ecology, Sustainability, Values (A.-L. Sippola, P. Alaraudanjoki, B. Forbes and V. Hallikainen, eds), pp. 210-237. Arctic Centre Publications, No. 7.
16. Hull, R. B. and Buhyoff, G. J. (1983). Distance and scenic beauty. A nonmonotonic relationship. Environment and Behaviour 1, 77-91.
17. Hultman, S. (1979). Friluftsskogen i folkets ögon. [Recreation forest through public's eyes]. Sveriges Skogsförbunds Tidskrift 1, 32-49. (In Swedish)
18. Jensen, F. S. (1993). Landscape managers' and politicians' perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the populations. Forest & Landscape Research 1, 79-93.
19. Kardell, L. (1978). Kan hyggen vara annat än fula? [Clearcuts - Do they have to be ugly?]. Sveriges Skogsförbunds Tidskrift 76, 385-433. (In Swedish, with English summary)
20. Kardell, L. (1990). Taltorpsmon i Åtvidaberg. Förändringar i upplevelsen av skogen mellan 1978 och 1989. [Changes in experiencing forest in years 1978 and 1989]. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för Skoglig Landskapsvård, Rapport No. 46. (In Swedish)
21. Kardell, L. (1991). Skogsbruket och landskapsvåden. [Forestry and landscape management]. Skog & Forskning 3, 13-20. (In Swedish)
22. Karhu, I. and Kellomäki, S. (1980). Väestön mielipiteet metsänhoidon vaikutuksesta maisemakuvaan Puolangan kunnassa. [Effects of silvicultural practice on amenity of forest landscape]. Silva Fennica 14, 409-428. (In Finnish, with English summary)
23. Karjalainen, E. (1996). Scenic preferences concerning clear-fell areas in Finland. Landscape Research 21, 159-173.
24. Karjalainen, E. and Komulainen, M. (1998). Field afforestation preferences: - A case study in north-eastern Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning 533, 1-12.
25. Knopf, R. C. (1987). Human behavior, cognition, and affect in the natural environment. In Handbook of Environmental Psychology, Volume 1 (D. Stokols and I. Altman, eds), pp 783-826. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Lucas, O. (1991). The Design of Forest Landscapes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Maisema-aluetyöryhmän mietintö I. (1992). Ympäristöministeriö. [Landscape management, report I of the working group on landscape areas]. Ministry of Environment, Report No. 66. Helsinki: Painatuskeskus Oy. (In Finnish, with English summary)
28. National Forest Landscape Management. (1972). USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook No. 559. Washington DC.
29. National Forest Landscape Management. (1973). Vol. 1. USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook No. 434. Washington DC.
30. Pukkala, T., Kellomäki, S. and Mustonen, E. (1988). Prediction of the amenity of a tree stand. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 3, 533-544.
31. Rautamäki, M. (1990). Maakunnallinen Maisemaselvitys. Varsinais-Suomi. [Landscape Investigation of South-West Finland]. Varsinais-Suomen seutukaavaliitto & Ympäristöministeriö. Turku. (In Finnish, with English summary)
32. Savolainen, R. and Kellomäki, S. (1981). Metsän maisemallinen arvostus. [Scenic value of forest landscape]. Acta Forestalia Fennica No. 170. (In Finnish, with English summary)
33. Schauman, S. (1988). Countryside scenic assessments: Tools and application. Landscape and Urban Planning 15, 227-239.
34. Shafer, E. L. and Brush, R. O. (1977). How to measure preferences of natural landscapes. Landscape Planning 4, 237-256.
35. Tahvanainen, L., Tyrväinen, L. and Nousiainen, I. (1996). Effect of afforestation on the scenic value of rural landscape. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 11, 397-405.
36. Tuovinen, P. (1992). Ympäristökuva ja symboliikka. Ympäristökuvan ja siihen liittyvien merkitysten analysointimetodiikasta. [Environmental picture and symbolism.] Doctor's thesis. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelum Täydennyskoulutuskeskuksen Julkaisuja No. A20. Teknillinen korkeakoulu. Espoo. (In Finnish, with English summary)
37. Wagar, J. A. (1974). Recreational and esthetic considerations. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-No. 24, H1-H15.