Towards automated interpretation of ultrasonic NDT data

NDT and E International

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 101-107

  Cornwell, I ^a   McNab, A ^a  

^a APES Research Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automated interpretation; Expert system; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DATA REDUCTION; EXPERT SYSTEMS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DATA INTERPRETATION;

ULTRASONIC TESTING;

EID: 0033101981     PISSN: 09638695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00016-4     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Murgatroyd RA, Worrall GM and Crutzen S. Lessons learned from the PISC III study of the influence of human factors on inspection reliability. In Proc. 6th Euro. Conf. on Non-Destructive Testing, pp. 989-993, Nice, 1994.
2. Passi G.S., Shoef Y., Kritsky M.V. Reducing the influence of human factors on the reliability of manual ultrasonic weld inspection. Insight. 37(10):1995;788-791.
3. McNab A., Dunlop I. A review of artificial intelligence applied to ultrasonic defect evaluation. Insight. 37(1):1995;11-16.
4. Hopgood A.A., Woodcock N., Hallani N.J., Picton P.D. Interpreting ultrasonic images using rules, algorithms and neural networks. European Journal of NDT. 2(4):1993;135-149.
5. Windsor CG. Can we train a computer to be a skilled inspector? Insight 1995, 37(1), 36-42 and 49.
6. McNab A. and Cornwell IH. Visualisation of 3D Ultrasonic Data, Insight, J. Br. Inst. NDT, October 1995, pp 814-819.
7. CLIPS Reference Manual