Let's focus on sustainability, not Kyoto

Electricity Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 56-67

  Linden, Henry R ^a  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; CARBON;

CARBON BUDGETS; CARBON EMISSIONS; EMISSION LEVEL; EMISSION TECHNOLOGY; LOW CARBON; ZERO CARBONS;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES;

EID: 0033098233     PISSN: 10406190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1040-6190(98)00123-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. 1. E.J. Dlugokencky, K.A. Masarie, P.M. Lang and P.P. Tans, Continuing Decline in the Growth Rate of the Atmospheric Methane Burden, Nature, Vol. 393, No. 6684, at 447-450 (1998).
2. 2. Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, International Energy Outlook 1998 - with Projections Through 2020, Document No. DOE/EIA-0484(98), April 1998.
3. 3. J.T. Houghton, et al., eds., "Climate Change 1995 - The Science of Climate Change," in Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group I, Cambridge University Press (1996).
4. 4. Id.
5. 5. EIA, supra note 2.
6. 6. Gas Research Institute, GRI Baseline Projection of U.S. Energy Supply and Demand, 1999 edition, Baseline/ Gas Resource Analytical Center, Gas Research Institute, Chicago (Aug. 1998).
7. 7. Bette Hileman, Greenhouse Gas Economics, Chem. & Eng. News, Vol. 76, No. 9, at 28-31 (March 2, 1998).
8. 8. Houghton et al., supra note 3
9. 9. Id.
10. 10. Houghton et al., supra note 3, Fig. 5(b) at 23.
11. 11. Houghton et al., supra note 3, Fig. 24 at 45.
12. 12. Houghton et al., supra note 3, Figs. 7(a) and (b) at 25.
13. 13. Houghton et al., supra note 3, Fig. 10.4 at 495.
14. 2 Concentrations - Cost-Effective Emission Reduction Strategies, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, Vol. 2, at 251-265 (1997).
15. 2Concentrations, Nature, Vol. 379, No. 6562, at 240-243 (1996).
16. 2 Concentrations, Nature, Vol. 379, No. 6562, at 240-243 (1996).
17. 16. Preliminary Hydrogen Vehicle Safety Report for the Ford Motor Co. under prime contract for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies. C.E. Thomas, Directed Technologies, Inc., Arlington, VA, July 23, 1996.
18. 17. Houghton et al., supra note 3, Fig. 10.4 at 495.
19. 18. EIA, supra note 2.
20. 2 Control and the U.S. Electricity Sector. Presented by Resource Data International, Inc. to Peabody Holding Company, July 1997.
21. 20. Jeff Johnson, The New World of Solar Energy, Chem. & Engineering News, Vol. 76, No. 13, at 24-28 (March 30, 1998).
22. 21. Total global power generation capacity in 1995 was about 3,000 GW. Announced U.S. wind power projects through 1999 total 800 MW.
23. 22. W. Burch, E. Rodwell, I. Taylor, and M. Thompson, A Review of the Economic Potential of Plutonium and Spent Nuclear Fuel, EPRI TR106072, Feb. 1996. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
24. 23. Yoon I. Chang, Status of Progress in IFR Development, Paper No. 94-JPG-NE-14 presented at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Joint International Power Generation Conference, Phoenix, AZ, Oct. 2-6, 1994.
25. 2, Princeton University/Center forEnergy and Environmental StudiesReport No. 295, Jan. 1996.
26. 2, Princeton University/Center for Energy and Environmental Studies Report No. 295, Jan. 1996.
27. 25. Henry R. Linden, Evolution of an Energy Contrarian, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, Vol. 21, at 31-67 (1996).
28. 26. J.H. Ausubel, Mitigation and Adaptation for Climate Change: Answers and Questions, The Bridge, Vol. 23, No. 3, at 15-30 (Fall 1993).