A comparison between two wear models

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 87, Issue 1-3, 1999, Pages 223-229

  Ståhlberg, Ulf ^a   Hallström, Jonas ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Counter blow hammer; Full scale experiments; Wear

Indexed keywords

DIES; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FORGING; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SHEAR STRESS;

COUNTER-BLOW HAMMERS;

WEAR OF MATERIALS;

EID: 0033097529     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00354-9     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. E. Doege, Standmengenverbesserung von Schmidegesenken, Industriverband Deutcher Schmiden (internal report), 1990, part B, pp. 8-9
2. J.F. Archard, Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces, J. Appl. Phys. 24 (1953) 981-988.
3. N. Biba, A. Lishny, O. Sadykhov, S. Stiebounov, Analysis of closed-die forging with FORM-2D finite element system, Formability '94 6th International Conference, Ostrava, 1994, 306-312.
4. S. Kalpakjian, Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984, pp. 206-210.
5. H.C. Meng, K.C. Ludema, Wear models and predictive equations: Their form and content, Wear 181-183 (1995) 443-457.
6. Form-2D manual, Finite element system for simulation and anal-ysis of forming processes, version 2.12, Quantor, Moscow, 1996.
7. H. Suzuki, S. Hashizume, Y. Yabuki, Studies on the flow stress of metals and alloys, Report of the institute of industrial science at the University of Tokyo, vol. 18, no 3, ser. 117, March, 1968, pp. 203.
8. T. Wanheim, N. Bay, A.S. Petersen, A theoretically determined model for friction in metal working processes, Wear 28 (1974) 251-258.