Effects of sample storage and delayed secondary enrichment on detection of Salmonella spp in swine feces

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 359-362

  O'Carroll, Julia M ^a,b   Davies, Peter R ^a   Correa, Maria T ^a   Slenning, Barrett D ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ATP Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; FECES; FEMALE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE;

ANIMALS; FECES; FEMALE; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIMEN HANDLING; SWINE;

EID: 0033090671     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berends BR, Snidjers JMA, van Logestijn JG. Efficacy of current EC meat inspection procedures and some proposed revisions with respect to microbiological safety: a critical review. Vet Rec 1993;133:411-415.
2. Davies PR. Food safety and access to domestic and export markets. Swine Health Prod 1997;5:13-20.
3. Final report for the USDA food safety inspection service and animal and plant health inspection service by the animal production technical analysis group. April 17,1995.
4. Davies PR, Morrow WEM, Deen J, et al. Prevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spiralis in finishing swine raised in different production systems in North Carolina, USA. Prev Vet Med 1998;36:67-76.
5. Davies PR, Morrow WEM, Jones FT, et al. Prevalence of Salmonella in finishing swine raised in different production systems in North Carolina, USA. Epidemiol Infect 1997;119:237-244.
6. Kampelmacher EH, Guinee PAM, Hofstra K, et al. Further studies of Salmonella in slaughterhouses and in normal slaughter pigs. Zentralbl Veterinarmed [B] 1963;10:1-27.
7. Ghosh AC. An epidemological study of the incidence of Salmonella in pigs. J Hyg (Camb) 1972;70:151-160.
8. Berends BR, Urlings HAP, Snidjers JMA, et al. Identification of risk factors in animal management and transport regarding Salmonella spp. in pigs. Int J Food Microbiol 1996;30:37-53.
9. Lax AJ, Barrow PA, Jones PW, et al. Current perspectives in salmonellosis. Br Vet J 1995;151:351-377.
10. D'aoust J-Y. Salmonella. In: Doyle MP, ed. Foodborne bacterial pathogens. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1989;327-445.
11. Bager F, Petersen J. Sensitivity and specificity of different methods for the isolation of Salmonella from pigs. Acta Vet Scand 1991;32:473-481.
12. Jameson JE. A discussion of the dynamics of Salmonella enrichment. J Hyg 1962;60:193-207.
13. Vassiliadis P, Trichopoulos D, Papadakis J, et al. Salmonella isolations in abattoirs in Greece. J Hyg (Camb) 1970;68:601-609.
14. Rigby CE, Pettit JR. Delayed secondary enrichment for the isolation of salmonellae from broiler chickens and their environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 1980;40:783-786.
15. Waltman WD, Home AM, Pirkle C. Influence of enrichment incubation time on the isolation of Salmonella. Avian Dis 1993;37:884-887.
16. Waltman WD, Horne AM, Pirkle C, et al. Use of delayed secondary enrichment for the isolation of salmonella in poultry and poultry' environments. Avian Dis 1991;35:88-92.
17. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981;112-137.
18. Harvey RWS, Price TH. Effect of stool storage at room temperature on salmonella isolation from feces. J Hyg Camb 1983;91:267-271.
19. Opara OO, Mallinson ET, Tate CR, et al. The effect of exposure, storage times, and types of holding media on the drag-swab monitoring technique of Salmonella. Avian Dis 1992;36:63-68.
20. Funk JA, Davies PR, Nichols MG Evaluation of sample weight for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine feces, in Proceedings. 2nd Intern Symp Epidemiology Control Salmonella Pork. 1997;97-99.
21. Larkin PJ, Hicks M. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic Salmonella typhimurium infection in sows. Vet Rec 1967;81:231-234.