Tribunal experiments in popular justice?

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 177-197

  Carney, Terry ^a   Tait, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONTRACEPTION; COURT; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; JUSTICE; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; NEW ZEALAND; RESPONSIBILITY; SEXUAL CRIME; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUSTRALIA; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; STERILIZATION, INVOLUNTARY; STERILIZATION, REPRODUCTIVE;

EID: 0033090185     PISSN: 01602527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-2527(99)00004-7     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alexander G. Avoiding guardianship. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect. 2:1990;163-175.
2. Allen R. Legal rights of the disabled and disadvantaged. 1969;Social and Rehabilitation Service, U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, Washington, DC.
3. Ashman A. Sterilisation and training for normal sexual development. Human rights and obligations Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities. 16:1990;359-368.
4. Atkin W. The courts, family control and disability - Aspects of New Zealand's Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review. 18:1988;345-365.
5. Bennett B. Law and medicine. 1997;LBC, Sydney.
6. Blackwood J. Sterilisation of the intellectually disabled. The need for legislative reform Australian Journal of Family Law. 5:1991;138-170.
7. Blackwood J. Medical treatment of the intellectually disabled child. Journal of Law and Medicine. 1:1994;252-259.
8. Blankman K. Guardianship models in the Netherlands and Western Europe. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 20:1997;47-57.
9. Booth T., Booth W. Sounds of silence. Narrative research with inarticulate subjects Disability and Society. 11:1996;55-69.
10. Brady S. Invasive and irreversible. Alternative Law Journal. 21:1996;160-164.
11. Brady S., Cooper D. A question of right treatment. The family court and special procedures for children:1997;Family Court of Australia, Brisbane.
12. Cappelletti M., Garth B. Access to justice. The newest wave in the worldwide movement to make rights effective Buffalo Law Review. 27:1978;181-292.
13. Carlson, G. (1994). Substitute decision making: Managing menstruation for young women who have intellectual disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland.
14. Carney T. Civil and social guardianship for intellectually handicapped people. Monash University Law Review. 8:1982;199-232.
15. Carney T. The limits and the social legacy of guardianship in Australia. Federal Law Review. 18:1989;231-266.
16. Carney T., Akers K. A coffee table chat or a formal hearing. Australian Dispute Resolution Journal. 2:1991;141-158.
17. Carney T., Singer P. Ethical and legal issues in guardianship options for intellectually disadvantaged people. 1986;A.G.P.S, Canberra.
18. Carney T., Tait D. Balanced accountability. An evaluation of the Victorian guardianship and administration board:1991;Office of the Public Advocate, Melbourne.
19. Carney T., Tait D. "Caught between two systems? Guardianship and young people with a disability." International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 20:1997;141-166. a.
20. Carney T., Tait D. The adult guardianship experiment. Tribunals and popular justice:1997;Federation Press, Sydney. b.
21. Carney T., Tait D. Adult guardianship. Narrative readings in the "shadow" of the law? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 21:1998;147-162.
22. Cocks E. Report of the Minister's Committee on Rights and Protective Legislation for Intellectually Handicapped Persons. 1982;Victoria. Government Printer, 1986, Melbourne.
23. Conley J., O'Barr W. Rules vs relationships. The ethnography of legal discourse:1990;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
24. Ewick P., Silbey S. Subversive stories and hegemonic tales. Towards a sociology of narrative Law and Society Review. 29:1995;197-226.
25. Ford J. The sterilisation of young women with an intellectual disability. A comparison between the Family Court and the Guardianship Board of New South Wales Australian Journal of Family Law. 10:1996;236-262.
26. Frolik L. Plenary guardianship. An analysis, a critique and a proposal for reform Arizona Law Review. 23:1981;599-660.
27. Galt, B. (1986). A critique and revision of the Utah guardianship statute for incapacitated persons. Utah Law Review, 629-663.
28. George A. Sterilisation and intellectually disabled children. In the matter of P & P Sydney Law Review. 18:1996;218-233.
29. Goldhar J. The sterilisation of women with an intellectual disability. University of Tasmania Law Review. 10:1991;157-196.
30. Graycar R. Sterilisation of young women with disabilities. Towards a new regulatory framework Australian Journal of Human Rights. 1:1994;380-391.
31. Handsley E. "Sterilisation" of young intellectually disabled women. Monash University Law Review. 20:1994;271-299.
32. Kittrie N. The right to be different. Deviance and enforced therapy:1971;Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.
33. Krasik M. The lights of science and experience. Historical perspectives on legal attitudes towards the role of medical expertise in guardianship of the elderly American Journal of Legal History. 33:1989;201-240.
34. Lee M. Non-therapeutic sterilisation of intellectually disabled women. Legal Service Bulletin. 13:1988;199-201.
35. Ludbrook R. Sterilisation of intellectually disabled young people. Who decides? Alternative Law Journal. 19:1994;140.
36. Maclean's. (1997). Scandals over sterilisation. Maclean's, 110, 42.
37. Marta J. A linguistic model of informed consent. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 21:1996;41-60.
38. McLaughlin P. Guardianship of the person. 1979;National Institute on Mental Retardation, Downsview, Ontario.
39. Neugebauer R. Treatment of the mentally ill in medieval and early modern England. A reappraisal Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences. 14:1978;158-169.
40. Plummer K. Telling sexual stories. Power, change and social worlds:1995;Routledge, New York.
41. Porter Reflections on guardianship. Interaction. 4:1990;10-15.
42. Queensland Law Reform Commission. (1996). Assisted and substituted decisions: decisionmaking by and for people with a decision-making disability (Report no. 49, 3 vols.). Brisbane: Qld. Gov. Pr.
43. Rhoades H. Intellectual disability and sterilisation - An inevitable connection? Australian Journal of Family Law. 9:1995;234-251.
44. Rogers A. Europe. Sterilisation of the mentally handicapped The Lancet. 340:1992;780.
45. Sainsbury, R., & Genn, H. (1995). Access to justice: Lessons from tribunals. In A. Zuckerman & R. Cranston, (Eds.), Reform of civil procedure: Essays on "access to justice" (pp. 413-429). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. Schmidt C. Quantitative information about the quality of the guardianship system. Toward the next generation of guardianship research Probate Law Journal. 10:1990;61-80.
47. Sherman R. Guardianship. Time for a reassessment Fordham Law Review. 49:1980;350-378.
48. Simonsen, J. (1997). Alberta's Sexual Sterilisation Act: State abuse and psychiatric failure. Unpublished paper presented at the 22nd International Congress on Law and Mental Health, Montreal, June.
49. Sundram C. Informed consent for major medical treatment of mentally disabled people. New England Journal of Medicine. 318:1988;1368-1373.
50. Sundram C.J., Stavis P.F. Obtaining informed consent for treatment of mentally incompetent patients. A decade under New York's innovative approach International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 22:1999;107-123.
51. Tait D. Metaphor wars in evaluation research. Reviewing guardianship boards in two states Journal of Law and Society. 21:1994;238-252.
52. Tait D., Carney T., Deane K. Legal regulation of sterilisation. The role of guardianship tribunals in NSW and Victoria Australian Journal of Family Law. 8:1994;141-165.
53. Turnbull H. Law and the mentally retarded citizen. American responses to the declarations of rights of the United Nations and International Leagues of Societies for the Mentally Handicapped - Where we have been, are, and are headed Syracuse Law Review. 30:1979;1093-1143.
54. United Nations Declaration on the rights of mentally retarded persons. 1971;Author, New York.
55. United Nations Declaration on the rights of the disabled. 1976;Author, New York.
56. Witting C. Medical decision-making for the Incompetent. Journal of Law and Medicine. 3:1996;377-399.