|
Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 69-73
|
Commentary: anxieties as a legal impediment to the doctor-proxy relationship.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL;
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
CONFLICT;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
EMOTION;
FAMILY;
GROUP PROCESS;
HEALTH CARE FACILITY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RELATION;
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;
INFORMATION SERVICE;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
LIVING WILL;
LONG TERM CARE;
MALPRACTICE;
MENTAL STRESS;
MOTIVATION;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PHYSICIAN;
POLICY;
POLITICS;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RISK MANAGEMENT;
TERMINAL CARE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
DECISION MAKING;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
EMOTIONS;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FAMILY;
GROUP PROCESSES;
HEALTH FACILITIES;
HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE;
HUMANS;
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;
INFORMATION SERVICES;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
MALPRACTICE;
MEDICAL FUTILITY;
MOTIVATION;
ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY;
PHYSICIANS;
POLITICS;
PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RISK MANAGEMENT;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
TERMINAL CARE;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0033089639
PISSN: 10731105
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1999.tb01437.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|