Behavioral and verbal responses of unabused externalizing children to anatomically detailed doll interviews

Journal of Family Violence

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 61-70

  Weill, Robin ^a   Dawson, Brenda L ^a   Range, Lillian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomical dolls; Externalizing children; Unabused

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033084403     PISSN: 08857482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022818026760     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. August, R. L., and Forman, B. D. (1989). A comparison of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children's behavioral responses to anatomically correct dolls. Child Psychiatry Hum. Devel., 20: 39-47.
2. Barkley, R. A. (1989). Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. In Mash, E. J., and Barkley, R. A. (eds.), Treatment of Childhood Disorders, Guilford, New York, pp. 39-72.
3. Boat, B. W., and Everson, M. D. (1994). Exploration of anatomical dolls by nonreferred preschool-aged children: Comparisons by age, gender, race, and socioeconomic status. Child Abuse Negl., 18: 139-153.
4. Boat, B. W., and Everson, M. D. (1988). Research and issues in using anatomical dolls. Annals Sex Res. 1: 191-204.
5. Boat, B. W., and Everson, M. D. (1988b). Use of anatomical dolls among professionals in sexual abuse evaluations. Child Abuse Negl., 12: 171-179.
6. Conners, C. K. (1985). The Conners Rating Scales: Instruments for the assessment of childhood psychopathology, Unpublished manuscript, Children's Hospital National Medical Center, Washington, DC.
7. Dawson, B., and Geddie, L. (1998). Low-income preschoolers' behavior with anatomically detailed dolls. J. Fam. Viol. In press.
8. Dawson, B., Vaughan, A. R., and Wagner, W. G. (1992). Normal responses to anatomically detailed dolls. J. Fam. Viol., 7: 135-152.
9. Everson, M. D., and Boat, B. W. (1994). Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: An examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations. Child Abuse Negl., 18: 113-129.
10. Geddie, L. (1993). Income and ethnic differences in nonabused preschoolers' interactions with anatomically detailed dolls. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.
11. Glaser, D., and Collins, C. (2989). The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 30: 547-560.
12. Jampole, L., and Weber, M. K. (1987). An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children with anatomically correct dolls. Child Abuse Negl., 11: 187-192.
13. Sattler, J. (1990). Assessment of Children (3rd edition), Jerome M. Sattler, San Diego, CA.
14. Sivan, A. B., Schor, D. P., Koeppl, G. K., and Noble, L. D. (1989). Interaction of normal children with anatomical dolls. Child Abuse Negl., 12: 295-304.
15. Schwartz and Johnson, (1985). Psychopathology of Childhood (2nd edition), Pergamon, New York.
16. Sutherland (1993). The relationship between previous sexual behavior and nonabused children's behavior during assessment using anatomically detailed doll, Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.
17. Wechsler, D. (1989). Manual for the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised.
18. White, S., Strom, G. A., Santilli, G., and Halpin, M. B. (1986). Interviewing young sexual abuse victims with anatomically correct dolls. Child Abuse Negl., 10: 519-529.