A review of vorticity conditions in the numerical solution of the ζ-ψ equations

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 139-185

  Napolitano, M ^a   Pascazio, G ^a   Quartapelle, L ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRA; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; VISCOUS FLOW; VORTEX FLOW;

DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITION; NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONDITION;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; VISCOUS FLOW; VORTICITY;

INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; VISCOUS FLOW; VORTICITY;

EID: 0033082861     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7930(98)00024-3     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Roache PJ. Computational fluid dynamics. Albuquerque: Hermosa, 1972.
2. Gupta M.M., Manohar R.P. Boundary approximations and accuracy in viscous flow computations. J Comput Phys. 31:1979;265-288.
3. Peyret R, Taylor TD. Computational methods for fluid flows. New York: Springer, 1983.
4. Fletcher CAJ. Computational techniques for fluid dynamics. In: Springer Series in Computational Physics. Berlin: Springer, 1988;Vols I and II.
5. Gresho P.M. Incompressible fluid dynamics: some fundamental formulation issues. Ann Rev Fluid Mech. 23:1991;413-453.
6. Allen D.N. de G., Southwell R.V. Relaxation methods applied to determine the motion, in two dimensions, of a viscous fluid past a fixed cylinder. Q J Mech Appl Math. 8:1955;129-145.
7. Dennis S.C.R., Dunwoody J. The steady flow of a viscous fluid past a flat plate. J Fluid Mech. 24:1966;577-595.
8. Dennis S.C.R., Walker J.D.A. Calculation of the steady flow past a sphere at low and moderate Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 48:1971;771-789.
9. Quartapelle L., Valz-Gris F. Projection conditions on the vorticity in viscous incompressible flows. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 1:1981;129-144.
10. Quartapelle L. Vorticity conditioning in the calculation of two-dimensional viscous flows. J Comput Phys. 40:1981;453-477.
11. Quartapelle L. Numerical solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Basel, Birkhäuser, 1993.
12. Schreiber R., Keller H.B. Driven cavity flows by efficient numerical techniques. J Comput Phys. 49:1983;310-333.
13. Roache PJ. Elliptic marching methods and domain decomposition. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1995.
14. Fox L. The numerical solution of elliptic differential equations when the boundary conditions involve a derivative. Phil Trans Roy Soc London. A242:1950;345-378.
15. Thom A. The flow past circular cylinders at low speeds. Proc Roy Soc London A. 141:1933;651-669.
16. Burggraf O.R. Analytical and numerical studies of the structure of steady separated flows. J Fluid Mech. 24:1966;113-151.
17. Woods L.C. A note on the numerical solution of fourth-order differential equations. Aero Q. 5:1954;176-182.
18. Jensen V.G. Viscous flow round a sphere at low Reynolds numbers (≤40). Proc R Soc London. A 294:1959;346-366.
19. Briley W.R. A numerical study of laminar separation bubbles using Navier-Stokes equations. J Fluid Mech. 47:1971;713-736.
20. D'Alessio S.J.D., Dennis S.C.R. A vorticity model for viscous flow past a cylinder. Comput Fluids. 23:1994;279-293.
21. Glowinski R., Pironneau O. Numerical methods for the first biharmonic equation and for the two-dimensional Stokes problem. SIAM Rev. 21:1979;167-212.
22. Gazdag J, Takao Y, Fromm J. Rigorous numerical treatment of the no-slip condition in a vorticity formulation. In: Numerical boundary condition procedures. NASA CP 2201, Moffett Field, California, 1982:367-73.
23. Ehrenstein U., Peyret R. A Chebyshev collocation method for the Navier-Stokes equations with application to double-diffusive convection. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 9:1989;427-452.
24. Guermond J.L., Quartapelle L. Equivalence of u-p and ζ-ψ formulations of the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 18:1994;471-487.
25. Temam R. Navier-Stokes equations. Theory and numerical analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1984.
26. Guermond J.L., Quartapelle L. Uncoupled ω-ψ formulation for plane flows in multiply connected domains. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci. 7:1997;731-767.
27. Davis R.T. Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations for symmetric laminar incompressible flow past a parabola. J Fluid Mech. 51:1972;417-433.
28. Campion-Renson A., Crochet M.J. On the stream function-vorticity finite element solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 12:1978;1809-1818.
29. Rubin S.G., Khosla P.K. Polynomial interpolation methods for viscous flow calculations. J Comput Phys. 24:1977;217-244.
30. Heinrichs W. A spectral multigrid method for the Stokes problem in stream-function formulation. J Comput Phys. 102:1992;310-318.
31. Birkhoff G, Lynch RE. Numerical solution of elliptic problems. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1984.
32. LeVeque RJ. Finite difference methods for differential equations. Lecture notes, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 1997.
33. Swarztrauber P.N., Sweet R.A. Efficient FORTRAN subprograms for the solution of elliptic partial differential equations. NCAR-TN/IA. 105:1975.
34. Huang H., Wetton B.R. Discrete compatibility in finite difference methods for viscous incompressible fluid flow. J Comput Phys. 126:1996;468-478.
35. Ghia U., Ghia K.N., Shin C.T. High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method. J Comput Phys. 48:1982;387-411.
36. Khosla P.K., Rubin S.G. Navier-Stokes calculations with a coupled strongly implicit method-I, finite-difference solutions. Comput Fluids. 9:1981;163-180.
37. Napolitano M., Walters R.W. An incremental block-line-Gauss-Seidel method for the Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA J. 24:1986;770-776.
38. Leonard B.P. A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng. 19:1979;59-98.
39. Dennis S.C.R., Quartapelle L. Finite difference solution to the flow between rotating spheres. Comput Fluids. 12:1984;77-92.
40. Napolitano M. Efficient solution of two-dimensional steady separated flows. Comput Fluids. 20:1991;213-222.
41. Quartapelle L., Napolitano M. A method for solving the factorized vorticity-stream function equations by finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 4:1984;109-125.
42. Giannattasio P., Napolitano M. Optimal vorticity conditions for the node-centred finite-difference discretization of the second-order vorticity-velocity equations. J Comput Phys. 127:1996;208-217.
43. Stevens W.N.R. Finite element, stream function-vorticity solution of steady laminar natural convection. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 2:1982;349-366.
44. Barragy E., Carey G.F. Stream function-vorticity driven cavity solution using p finite elements. Comput Fluids. 26:1997;453-468.
45. Dean E.J., Glowinski R., Pironneau O. Iterative solution of the stream function-vorticity formulation of the Stokes problem, applications to the numerical simulation of incompressible viscous flow. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng. 87:1991;117-155.
46. Souli M. A variational finite element method for the two-dimensional Stokes problem. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng. 108:1993;223-236.
47. Ruas V. Approximating harmonic bases for a decoupled solution of viscous flows problems in ψ-ω formulation. ZAMM Z Angew Math Mech. 75:1995;407-408.
48. Arakawa A. Computational design for long-term numerical integration of the equations of fluid motion: two-dimensional incompressible flow, Part I. J Comput Phys. 1:1966;119-143.
49. Hou T.Y., Wetton B.T.R. Convergence of a finite difference scheme for the Navier-Stokes equations using vorticity boundary conditions. SIAM J Numer Anal. 29:1992;615-639.
50. E W., Liu J.G. Vorticity boundary condition and related issues for finite difference schemes. J Comput Phys. 124:1996;368-382.
51. Guermond JL, Quartapelle L. Weak approximation of the ψ-ω equations with explicit viscous diffusion. Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci. 1998.
52. Nguyen H.D., Paik S., Chung J.N. Application of vorticity integral conditioning to Chebyshev pseudospectral formulation for the Navier-Stokes equations. J Comput Phys. 106:1993;115-124.