VRUSE - A computerised diagnostic tool: For usability evaluation of virtual/synthetic environment systems

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 11-25

  Kalawsky, Roy S ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Human performance; Usability; User performance; Virtual environments; VR

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PERFORMANCE; USER INTERFACES;

HUMAN PERFORMANCE; USABILITY; USER PERFORMANCE;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 0033081343     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00047-7     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bevan, N., 1997. Quality in use: incorporating human factors into the software engineering lifecycle. Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. and Forum on Software Engineering Standards, JSESS'97 Conf. August 1997, or see http://www.usability.serco.com/publ.html
2. Chapanis, A., 1991. Evaluating usability. In: Shackel, B., Richardson, S. (Eds.), Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Cellier, J.M., Eyrolle, H., Mariné, C., 1997. Expertise in dynamic environments. Ergonomics 40(1), 28-50.
4. Dreyfus, H.L., 1992. La porteé philosophique du connexionnisme, In: D. Andler, (Ed.), Introduction Aux Sciences Cognitives. Gallimard, Paris, pp. 352-373.
5. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E., 1988. Development of a multidimensional workload rating scale: results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N., (Eds.), Human Mental Workload. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
6. Kalawsky, R.S., 1993. The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments. Addison-Wesley, Longman, ISBN 0-201-63171-7.
7. Kalawsky, R.S., 1996. AGOCG Report. Exploiting Virtual Reality Techniques in Education and Training: Technological Issues, http://www.man.ac.uk/MVC//SIMA/vrtech/title.html.
8. Kirakowski, J., Corbett, M. 1993. SUMI: the software usability measurement inventory. British J. Educational Technol. 24, 210-212.
9. Macleod, M., Bowden, R., Bevan, N., Curson, I., 1997. The MUSiC Performance Measurement Method, Behaviour and Information Technology, 16, or from http://www.usability.serco.com/publ.html
10. Porteous et al., 1993. SUMI User Handbook. Human Factors Research Group, University College Cork, Ireland.
11. Preece, J. et al., 1994. Human Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
12. Shackel, B., 1981. The concept of usability. Proc. IBM Software and Information Usability Symp. Poughkeepsie, NY, 15-18 September. pp. 1-30.
13. Sheridan, T.B., 1992. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence 1(1), 120-25.
14. Shneiderman, B., 1987. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
15. Thomas, C., Bevan, N., 1995. Usability Context Anaysis: A Practical Guide, National Physical Laboratory.
16. Thomas, C., Curson, I., 1995. Performance Measurement Handbook. National Physical Laboratory, NPLU/PMH/v3.0/Dec 95.
17. Vidulich, M.A., Tsang, P.S., 1986. Techniques of subjective workload assessment: a comparison of SWAT and the NASA Biploar Method. Ergonomics 29(11), 1385-1398.
18. Wickens, C.D., 1984. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance Metrics. Merrill, Columbus.