Sexual selection by male choice in monogamous and polygynous human populations

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 77-93

  Ihara, Yasuo ^a   Aoki, Kenichi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; POLYGYNY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

EID: 0033080415     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1388     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alexander R. D., Hoogland J. L., Howard R. D., Noonan K. M., Sherman P. W. Sexual dimorphism and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates, and humans. Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. 1979;Duxbury Press, North Scituate. p. 402-435.
2. Andersson M. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution. 40:1986;804-816.
3. Aoki K., Feldman M. W. A gene-culture coevolutionary model for brother-sister mating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;13046-13050.
4. Barkow J. H., Cosmides L., Tooby J. The Adapted Mind. 1992;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
5. Borgerhoff Mulder M. Resources and reproductive success in women with an example from the Kipsigis of Kenya. J. Zool. London. 213:1987;489-505.
6. Borgerhoff Mulder M. Kipsigis women's preferences for wealthy men: Evidence for female choice in mammals. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27:1990;255-264.
7. Buss D. M. Sex difference in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12:1989;1-49.
8. Byard P. J. Quantitative genetics of human skin color. Year Book Phys. Anthropol. 24:1981;123-137.
9. Cronk L. Wealth, status, and reproductive success among the Mukogodo of Kenya. Am. Anthropol. 932:1991;345-360.
10. Darwin C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. 1871;Murray, London.
11. Fisher R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. 1958;Dover, New York.
12. Gwynne D. T. Sexual difference theory: Mormon crickets show role reversal in mate choice. Science. 213:1981;779-780.
13. Gwynne D. T. Sexual selection and sexual differences in Mormon crickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae,Anabrus simplex. Evolution. 38:1984;1011-1022.
14. Gwynne D. T. Sexual selection among females: What causes courtship-role reversal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:1991;118-121.
15. Gwynne D. T. Food quality control sexual selection in Mormon crickets by altering male mating investment. Ecology. 74:1993;1406-1413.
16. Hewlett B. S. Sexual selection and paternal investment among Aka pygmies. Betzig L., Borgerhoff Mulder M., Turke P. Human Reproductive Behavior: A Darwinian Perspective. 1988;263-276 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
17. Hulse F. S. Selection for skin color among the Japanese. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 27:1967;143-156.
18. Irons W. Cultural and biological success. Chagnon N. A., Irons W. Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. 1979;257-272 Duxbury Press, North Scituate.
19. Iwasa Y., Pomiankowski A., Nee S. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The "handicap" principle. Evolution. 45:1991;1431-1442.
20. Jones D. Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny; cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropol. 36:1995;723-748.
21. Kirkpatrick M. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution. 36:1982;1-12.
22. Kirkpatrick M., Price T., Arnold S. J. The Darwin-Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evolution. 44:1990;180-193.
23. Laland K. N. Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. Theor. Popul. Biol. 45:1994;1-15.
24. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:1981;3721-3725.
25. Loomis W. F. Skin-pigment regulation of vitamin-D biosynthesis in man. Science. 157:1967;501-506.
26. Mace R. Biased parental investment and reproductive success in Gabbra pastoralists. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38:1996;75-81.
27. Murray F. G. Pigmentation, sunlight and nutritional disease. Am. Anthropol. 36:1934;438-445.
28. O'Donald P. Genetic models of sexual and natural selection in monogamous organisms. Heredit. 44:1980;391-415.
29. Orians G. H. On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am. Nat. 103:1969;589-603.
30. Perrett D. I., May K. I., Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature. 368:1994;239-242.
31. Pomiankowski A. Sexual selection: The handicap principle does work - sometimes. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B. 231:1987;123-145.
32. Pomiankowski A., Iwasa Y., Nee S. The evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution. 45:1991;1422-1430.
33. Robins A. H. Biological Perspectives on Human Pigmentation. 1991;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
34. Rosenqvist G. Male mate choice and female-female competition for mates in the pipefish. Nerophis ophidion, Anim. Behav. 39:1990;1110-1115.
35. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 65:1993;293-307.
36. Singh D., Young R. K. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgements of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethol. Sociobiol. 16:1995;483-507.
37. Testart A. The significance of food storage among hunter- gatherers: Residence patterns, population densities, and social inequalities. Current Anthropol. 23:1982;523-537.
38. Trivers R. L. Parental investment and sexual selection. Campbell B. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971. 1972;136-179 Heinemann, London.
39. van den Berghe P. L., Frost P. Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene culture coevolution. Ethnic Racial Stud. 9:1986;87-113.
40. Wallace B. Topics in Population Genetics. 1968;Norton, New York.