Efficient implementation of semantic relations in lexical databases

Computational Intelligence

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 79-87

  Priss, Uta ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Formal concept analysis; Knowledge representation; Semantic relations

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS;

FORMAL CONCEPT ANALYSIS; SEMANTIC RELATIONS;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 0033079891     PISSN: 08247935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0824-7935.00083     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. EVANS, R., and G. GAZDAR. 1989. The semantics of DATR. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the AISB, Falmer, Sussex. Pitman/Morgan Kaufmann, London. Edited by A. G. COHN, pp. 79-87.
2. FISCHER, DIETRICH H. 1991. Consistency rules and triggers for thesauri. International Classification, 18(4):212-225.
3. GANTER, BERNHARD, and RUDOLF WILLE. 1997. Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg. (Translation of: Formale Begriffsanalyse: Mathematische Grundlagen. Springer, Heidelberg, 1996.)
4. PRISS, UTA. 1996. Relational concept analysis: Semantic structures in dictionaries and lexical databases. Dissertation, TH-Darmstadt.
5. WESTERSTAHL, DAG. 1989. Quantifiers in formal and natural languages. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 4. Edited by D. Gabbay and F. Guenther. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
6. WINSTON, MORTON E., ROGER CHAFFIN, and DOUGLAS HERRMANN. 1987. A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science, 11:417-444.
7. WOODS, WILLIAM A. 1990. Understanding subsumption and taxonomy: A framework for progress. In Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge. Edited by J. Sowa. M. Kaufmann, California.