Testing contrasting interaction models for discriminating between consensual and dissentient decision-making groups

Small Group Research

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 29-58

  VanLear, C Arthur ^b   Mabry, Edward A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033074799     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649649903000103     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111-161). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe.
3. Bales, R. F. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), The family, socialization, and interaction process (pp. 259-306). New York: Free Press.
4. Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. (1951). Phases in group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495.
5. Bennis, W. G., & Shepard, H. A. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415-438.
6. Brennan, R., & Prediger, D. (1981). Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 687-699.
7. Cohen, J. A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
8. DeStephen, R. S. (1983a). Group interaction differences between high and low consensus groups. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 340-363.
9. DeStephen, R. S. (1983b). High and low consensus groups: A content and relational interaction analysis. Small Group Behavior, 14, 143-162.
10. DeStephen, R. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Small group consensus: Stability of group support of the decision, task process, and group relationships. Small Group Behavior, 19, 227-239.
11. Fisher, B. A. (1970a). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision-making. Speech Monographs, 37, 53-66.
12. Fisher, B. A. (1970b). The process of decision modification in small discussion groups. Journal of Communication, 20, 51-64.
13. Fisher, B. A. (1980). Small group decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Fisher, B. A., & Hawes, L. C. (1971). An interact system model: Generating a grounded theory of small group decision making. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58, 444-453.
15. Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1996). Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 55-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Hamilton, M. A., & Hunter, J. E. (1985). Analyzing utterances as the observational unit. Human Communication Research, 12, 285-294.
17. Hawes, L. C. (1973). Elements of a model for communication process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 11-21.
18. Hewes, D. C. (1985). Systematic bias in coding social interaction data. Human Communication Research, 11, 554-574.
19. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1980). A comparative analysis of communication patterns within effective and ineffective decision-making groups. Communication Monographs, 47, 312-321.
20. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness: An investigation of group phases. Human Communication Research, 9, 291-305.
21. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1984). Does consensus really result in higher quality group decisions? In G. M. Phillips & J. T. Wood (Eds.), Emergent issues in human decision making (pp. 40-49). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
22. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1985). Discussion procedures and decision-making performance: An investigation of group phases. Human Communication Research, 12, 203-224.
23. Hoffman, L. R. (1961). Conditions for creative problem-solving. Journal of Psychology, 52, 429-444.
24. Hoffman, L. R. (1979). The group problem-solving process: Studies of a valence model. New York: Praeger.
25. Hoffman, L. R., & Kleinman, G. B. (1994). Individual and group in group problem solving: The valence model revisited. Human Communication Research, 21, 36-59.
26. Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N.R.F. (1964). Valence in the adoption of solutions by problem-solving groups: Concepts, method, and results. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 264-211.
27. Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N.R.F. (1967). Valence in the adoption of solutions by problem-solving groups II: Quality and acceptance as goals of leaders and members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 175-182.
28. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
29. Jarboe, S. (1988). A comparison of input-output, process-output, and input-process-output models of small group problem-solving effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 55, 121-142.
30. Jarboe, S. (1996). Procedures for enhancing group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 345-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Knutson, T. J. (1972). An experimental study of the effects of orientation behavior on small group consensus. Speech Monographs, 39, 159-165.
32. LaCoursiere, R. (1980). The lifecycle of groups. New York: Human Sciences Press.
33. Mabry, E. A. (1975a). Exploratory analysis of a developmental model for task-oriented small groups. Human Communication Research, 2, 66-74.
34. Mabry, E. A. (1975b). Sequential structure of interaction in encounter groups. Human Communication Research, 1, 302-307.
35. Mabry, E. A., & Attridge, M. D. (1990). Small group interaction and outcome correlates for structured and unstructured tasks. Small Group Research, 21, 315-332.
36. Mabry, E. A., & Barnes, R. E. (1980). Dynamics of small group communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37. McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
38. Meyers, R. A. (1989). Testing persuasive argument theory's predictor model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence. Communication Monographs, 56, 112-132.
39. Morley, D. D. (1986). Revised lag sequential analysis. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 172-182). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40. Moscovici, S. (1985). Innovation and minority influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. V. Avermate (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 9-48). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Nagao, D. H., Vollrath, D. A., & Davis, J. H. (1978). Introduction: Origins and current status of group decision-making. In H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis, & H. Schuler (Eds.), Dynamics of group decisions (pp. 35-52). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. Nemeth, C. J. (1992). Minority dissent as a stimulant to group performance. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 95-111). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Norusis, M. J. (1988). SPSS/PC V2.0 Base manual. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
44. Poole, M. S. (1981). Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models. Communication Monographs, 48, 1-24.
45. Poole, M. S. (1983a). Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making. Communication Monographs, 50, 206-232.
46. Poole, M. S. (1983b). Decision development in small groups III: A multiple sequence model of group decision development. Communication Monographs, 50, 321-341.
47. Poole, M. S. (1985). Tasks and interaction sequences: A theory of coherence in group decision-making. In R. Street & J. N. Cappella (Eds.), Sequence and pattern in communication behavior (pp. 206-224). London: Edward Arnold.
48. Poole, M. S., & Baldwin, C. L. (1996). Developmental processes in group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 215-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Poole, M. S., & Doelger, J. A. (1986). Developmental processes in group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 35-62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50. Poole, M. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1986). Communication and group decision-making: A critical assessment. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 15-31). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51. Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted decision-making. Human Communication Research, 22, 90-127.
52. Poole, M. S., McPhee, R. D., & Seibold, D. R. (1982). A comparison of normative and interactional explanations of group decision-making: Social decision schemes versus valence distributions. Communication Monographs, 49, 1-19.
53. Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989a). Decision development in small groups IV: A typology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323-356.
54. Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989b). Decision development in small groups V: Test of a contingency model. Human Communication Research, 15, 549-589.
55. Rawlins, W. K. (1984). Consensus in decision-making groups: A conceptual history. In G. M. Phillips & J. T. Wood (Eds.), Emergent issues in human decision making (pp. 19-39). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
56. Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57. Saine, T. J., & Bock, D. G. (1973). A comparison of the distributional and sequential structures of interaction in high and low consensus groups. Central States Speech Journal, 24, 125-130.
58. Scheidel, T. M., & Crowell, L. (1964). Idea development in small discussion groups. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 50, 140-145.
59. Seeger, J. A. (1983). No innate phases in group problem solving. Academy of Management Review, 8, 683-689.
60. Shelly, R. K. (1997). Sequences and cycles in social interaction. Small Group Research, 28, 333-356.
61. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 384-399.
62. VanLear, C. A. (1991). Testing a cyclical model of communication openness in relationship development: Two longitudinal studies. Communication Monographs, 58, 337-361.
63. VanLear, C. A. (1996). Communication process approaches and models: Patterns, cycles, and dynamic coordination. In J. H. Watt & C. A. VanLear (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes (pp. 35-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Wheelan, S. (1994). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
65. Wheelan, S. A., & Kaeser, R. M. (1997). The influence of task type and designated leaders on developmental patterns in groups. Small Group Research, 28, 94-122.
66. Wheelan, S. A., & McKeage, R. L. (1993). Developmental patterns in small and large groups. Small Group Research, 24, 60-83.
67. Wood, J. T. (1984). Alternative methods of group decision making: A comparative examination of consensus, negotiation, and voting. In G. M. Phillips & J. T. Wood (Eds.), Emergent issues in human decision making (pp. 3-18). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.