Controversial issues: A case for neutrality?

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 159-163

  Cain, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; ETHICS, NURSING; FACULTY, NURSING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; PREJUDICE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;

EID: 0033074521     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0624     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bailey C. Teaching by discussion and the neutral teacher. Journal of the Philosophy of Education. 7:1973;26-37.
2. Dearden R F. Controversial issues and the curriculum. Dearden R F. Theory and practice in education. 1984;84-93 Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
3. Warnock M. The neutral teacher. Brown S C. Philosophers discuss education. 1975;159-171 The MacMillan Press, London.
4. Deardén R F. Autonomy as an educational ideal. Brown S C. Philosophers discuss education. 1975;3-18 MacMillan, London.
5. Dewhurst D W. The teaching of controversial issues. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 26:1992;153-163.
6. Kleinig J. Neutrality in education. Kleinig J. Philosophical issues in education. 1982;102-116 Croom Helm, London.
7. Morgan J. A defence of autonomy as an educational ideal. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 30:1996;239-252.
8. Norman R. The neutral teacher. Brown S C. Philosophers discuss education. 1975;172-187 MacMillan, London.
9. Stradling R. Teaching controversial issues. 1984;Edward Arnold, London.