Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph™ Workstation) with conventional radiography

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-13

  Tsang, Kenneth H S ^a   Cooke, Michael S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MICROCOMPUTER; NOSE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELLA TURCICA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; MICROCOMPUTERS; NOSE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELLA TURCICA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0033072926     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/21.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adams J W 1940 Correction of error in cephalometric roentgenograms. Angle Orthodontist 10: 3-13
2. Altman D G 1991 Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London
3. Atchison K A 1986 Radiographic examinations of orthodontic educators and practitioners. Journal of Dental Education 50: 651-655
4. Atchison K A, Luke L S, White S C 1991 Contribution of pretreatment radiographs to orthodontists' decision making. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 71: 238-245
5. Bankvall G, Hakansson H A R 1982 Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from panoramic tomography, cephalometric radiography, and occlusal film radiography in children. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 53: 532-540
6. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971a The reliability of head film measurements 1. Landmark identification. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 111-127
7. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971b The reliability of head film measurements 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 505-517
8. Baumrind S, Miller D, Molthen R 1976 The reliability of head film measurements 3. Tracing superimposition. American Journal of Orthodontics 70: 617-644
9. Björk A 1947 The face in profile: an anthropological X-ray investigation on Swedish children and conscripts. Svensk Tandläkare Tidskrift 40 (Supplement no. 5B): 1-180
10. Bland J M, Altman D G 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i: 307-310
11. British Society for the Study of Orthodontics and the British Society of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology 1985 Report of a Joint Working Party. The reduction of the dose to patients during lateral cephalometric radiography. British Journal of Orthodontics 12: 176-178
12. Broadbent B H 1931 A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontics. Angle Orthodontist 1: 45-66. Reprinted 1981 Angle Orthodontist 51: 93-114
13. Broadbent B H 1931 A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontics. Angle Orthodontist 1: 45-66. Reprinted 1981 Angle Orthodontist 51: 93-114
14. Brodie A G 1941 On the growth pattern of the human head from the third month to the eighth year of life. American Journal of Anatomy 68: 209-262
15. Chaconas S J, Engel G A, Gianelly A A, Gorman J C 1990a The DigiGraph™ Work Station Part 1: Basic concepts. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 24: 360-367
16. Chaconas S J, Jacobson R L, Lemchen M S 1990b The DigiGraph™ Work Station. Part 3: Accuracy of cephalometric analyses. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 24: 467-471
17. Chan C K, Tng T H, Hägg U, Cooke M S 1994 Effects of cephalometric landmark validity on incisor angulation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 106: 487-495
18. Cohen A M 1984 Uncertainty in cephalometrics. British Journal of Orthodontics 11: 44-48
19. Cooke M S, Wei S H Y 1991 Cephalometric error: A comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs. Australian Dental Journal 36: 38-43
20. Doll G M, Zentner A, Hohensee A, Gärtner H, Sergl H G 1996 Sonic digitizing versus radiographic cephalometry -a clinical comparison. European Journal of Orthodontics 18: 410 (Abstract)
21. Downs W B 1948 Variation in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. American Journal of Orthodontics 34: 812-840
22. Eliasson S, Julin P, Richter S, Stenström B 1984 Radiation absorbed doses in cephalography. Swedish Dental Journal 8: 21-27
23. Franklin J B 1952 Certain factors of aberration to be considered in clinical roentgenographic cephalometry. American Journal of Orthodontics 38: 351-368
24. Gravely J F, Benzies P M 1974 The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry. British Journal of Orthodontics 1: 95-101
25. Hallett G E M 1959 Inherent errors in cephalometric films and their reduction. Transactions of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics pp. 1-10
26. Halse A, Hedin M 1978 May fast film-screen combinations be used for cephalometry? British Journal of Orthodontics 5: 189-192
27. Hofrath H 1931 Die bedeutung der röntgenfern und abstandsaufnahme für die diagnostik der kieferanomalien. Fortschritte der Orthodontik 1: 232-258
28. Houston W J B 1983 The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 382-390
29. Houston W J B, Maher R E, McElroy D, Sheriff M 1986 Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. European Journal of Orthodontics 8: 149-151
30. Jones G A 1987 Considerations for the apprehensive X-ray patient. General Dentistry 35: 102-103
31. L'Abée E M, Tan H T 1982 Improved radiation hygiene in lateral cephalometry and a method to obtain good reproduction of the soft tissue profile. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 16: 381-386
32. McNicol A, Stirrups D R 1985 Radiation dose during the dental radiographic techniques most frequently used during orthodontic treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics 7: 163-171
33. Midtgård J, Björk G, Linder-Aronson S 1974 Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthodontist 44: 56-61
34. Miller P A, Savara B S, Singh I J 1966 Analysis of errors in cephalometric measurements of three-dimensional distances on the maxilla. Angle Orthodontist 36: 169-174
35. Moyers R E 1988 Handbook of orthodontics (4th edn). Year Book Medical Publishers Inc., Chicago
36. Nanda R S, Ghosh J, Bazakidou E 1996 Three-dimensional facial analysis using a video imaging system. Angle Orthodontist 66: 181-188
37. Prawat J S, Nieberg L, Cisneros G J, Acs G 1995 A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values. Angle Orthodontist 65: 271-276
38. Preston-Martin S, White S C 1990 Brain and salivary gland tumors related to prior dental radiography: implications for current practice. Journal of the American Dental Association 120: 151-158
39. Ricketts R M 1981 Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthodontist 51: 115-150
40. Savara B S, Tracy W E, Miller P A 1966 Analysis of errors in cephalometric measurements of three-dimensional distances on the human mandible. Archives of Oral Biology 11: 209-217
41. Sikorski P A, Taylor K W 1984 The effectiveness of the thyroid shield in dental radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 58: 225-236
42. Taylor T S, Ackerman R J, Hardman P K 1988 Exposure reduction and image quality in orthodontic radiology: a review of the literature. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 93: 68-77
43. Tng T T H, Chan T C K, Hägg U, Cooke M S 1994 Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls. European Journal of Orthodontics 16: 110-120
44. Thurow R C 1951 Cephalometric methods in research and private practice. Angle Orthodontist 21: 104-116
45. Tyndall D A, Turner S P 1990 Radiographic materials, methods, film ordering patterns among orthodontic educators and private practitioners. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97: 159-167
46. Tyndall D A, Washburn D B 1986 Rare-earth filters in panoramic radiography: a means of reducing patient dose without compromising image quality. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 15: 19-25
47. Tyndall D A, Matteson R E, Soltmonn R E, Hamilton T L, Proffit W R 1988 Exposure reduction in cephalometric radiology: a comprehensive approach. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 93: 400-412
48. Valachovic R W, Lurie A G 1980 Risk benefit considerations in pedodontic radiology. Pediatric Dentistry 2: 128-146
49. Whitcher B L, Gratt B M, Sickles E A 1979 Leaded shields for thyroid dose reduction in intraoral dental radiography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 48: 567-570
50. Whitcher B L, Gratt B M, Sickles E A 1980 A lead apron for use in panoramic dental radiography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 49: 467-470
51. White S C 1992 Assessment of radiation risk from dental radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 21: 118-126
52. Wootton R 1993 Radiation protection of patients. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge